Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Fourteenth Report


6 SSSIs and the wider environmental agenda

41. SSSIs, important though they are, are not sufficient to conserve all of England's biodiversity; other kinds of protected sites and other policies are necessary. Some of our witnesses were concerned that the PSA target might divert attention from other aspects of biodiversity policy.

42. EN accepted that there was a possibility that that the degree of effort focussed on meeting the target could detract from work in other areas, but said that it was very careful to ensure that this did not occur.[47] Indeed, we received several suggestions that attention to the PSA target for SSSIs could have wider benefits for biodiversity and the environment by encouraging more environmentally sustainable policies.[48] Defra and English Nature should take care that policies intended to meet the PSA target do not have detrimental effects on other aspects of conservation.

43. Alongside the conservation benefits that are the prime function of SSSIs, these often very beautiful areas have a lot to offer in terms of recreation and education. Some local authorities, for example, have been able to achieve both favourable condition and some of these wider public benefits on SSSIs in their possession.

44. The Countryside and Rights of Way Act (CRoW) 2000 will further open access to many SSSIs: according to EN, 55% of CRoW access land is designated as SSSIs.[49] Some of our witnesses viewed greater public access as a potential threat to the condition of SSSIs: for example, a greater incidence of accidental fires might be expected if visitor numbers were higher. However EN believed that, if done carefully, "access can be managed in a wildlife-friendly way".[50]

45. Public access to SSSIs is important if their condition is to matter to more than a few dedicated conservationists. Of course, it is vital that visitors should not damage the sites but we believe that sensitive management of routes, access points and information should mean that the public can benefit from visiting SSSIs without compromising the condition of sites.


47   Q115 Back

48   Q8 Back

49   Q117 Back

50   Q118 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 15 July 2004