Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Sixteenth Report


3  FLOODING

32.  Wetter winters and more frequent episodes of extreme rainfall will lead to more frequent and perhaps more severe flooding. During our inquiry, we were told about two types of flooding: coastal and fluvial flooding, which is relatively well understood; and urban and sewer flooding, which is less so.

The Foresight report

33.  Our examination of the impact of climate change on flooding was informed by the Office of Science and Technology's Foresight report on flood and coastal defence.[29] The Foresight report used various economic and climate scenarios to explore changes in flood risk up to 2080. The report found that, although the extent of risk varied with the scenario used, in all cases risk increased and flash flooding in cities, with consequent sewer overflow, was identified as a particular problem.[30] There is some concern that, in some areas, the limits of sewer capacity are already being reached and that sewers will need to be upgraded to be able to cope with storms and sudden flood conditions.

34.  We warmly welcome the Foresight report's approach to examining long term flood risk and congratulate those involved on their work. It is now up to the Government to take this work forward and ensure that it is well prepared for the increased flood risk that climate change is likely to bring about. We recommend that the Government publish a white paper that offers a candid assessment of the implications of the Foresight report for flood protection and planning. It should contain a clear statement of the Government's strategy for dealing with increased flood risk and of the resources needed to implement that strategy. Defra should ensure that the scenarios on which the Foresight report is based are updated periodically.

Flood defences

35.  Under each scenario, it appears likely that spending on hard flood defences, such as sea walls and embankments, will have to increase. In part this will be because of the need to maintain and upgrade existing flood defences, such as the Thames barrier. Witnesses also outlined the potential for 'soft' flood defences such as wetlands, coastal salt marshes and, in some places, the managed retreat of the coastline.[31]

36.  Overall, though, there seemed to be a consensus that flood defence was relatively well understood. The difficulties came in making the economic trade-offs between building defences and suffering flood damage. The Environment Agency pointed out that it was not possible to build defences for every community at risk. It said that more open recognition of this fact would allow those affected to decide whether to accept a higher level of risk and to consider what other options, such as temporary defences, were available to them. The Agency's comments echoed those made by our predecessor committee, the Agriculture Committee , in its 1998 report on flood and coastal defence.[32]

37.  The Foresight report on future flooding has alerted us to the possible magnitude of future flood risk. In its response to this Report, the Government should tell us how and when it will decide what further flood protection is needed. It should also tell us how it is preparing for the upgrading and eventual replacement of the Thames barrier.

New developments

38.  The planning and design of new developments raised more questions than the construction of flood defences. It appears that new developments are planned with the main objective of creating a certain number of new homes and, as with water supply, the implications for flood risk are a subsidiary issue. However, it is at the planning stage that most can be done to minimise flood risk and to minimise the damage that flooding will do.

39.  The first and most important step is deciding where new developments are to be built. Although many of our largest cities, including London, are already built on flood plains, our witnesses agreed that new developments should avoid areas of high flood risk. The Environment Agency argued that some developments such as vulnerable households and facilities should never be on the flood plain.[33] The guidance to local authorities on this matter appears to be weak: the Environment Agency, which has responsibilities for flood defence, is not a statutory consultee for flood risk.[34]

40.  If some new housing must be built on flood plains, planners can ensure that there are areas within the development, such as parks, that will hold floodwater if drainage systems are overwhelmed. The planning stage should also be an opportunity to ensure that the drainage and sewerage systems will rarely be overwhelmed because they are designed with climate change and the likely increased risk of flooding in mind. In this, we echo the conclusions reached by our predecessor committee, the Environment, Transport and the Regions Committee, in their report on development on the flood plain.[35]

41.  For those properties at high risk, there are ways of increasing their resilience to flood damage. For example, the electricity supply can be brought in from above and the ground floor furniture and flooring can be made from less easily damaged materials.

42.  Planning policy is crucial in determining the flood risk that communities will face in the future. Planning policy guidance should take account of the likely future flood risk as well as present-day risk. The Environment Agency should now be a statutory consultee for flood risk assessments. Any new developments that are built in flood-prone areas should be designed to be as resilient to the effects of flooding as possible.

43.  Sewer flooding is particularly hazardous and distressing for those affected. The Government, water companies and the regulators should work together to ensure that the risk of sewer flooding is minimised, both for new and existing developments. For new developments, sewers should be designed to cope with the likely future volume of flow. For existing developments, water companies should upgrade existing sewers where possible and Ofwat should include the expense of doing so in the price limits it sets. The Government should encourage the use of sustainable drainage systems to reduce the pressure on sewers during periods of high rainfall.

Insurance

44.  At present, flood cover is included as a standard feature of household insurance policies. The increase in flooding expected to result from climate change will have a large impact on insurance: in a recent report, the Association of British Insurers estimated that claims could triple. This has given rise to fears that companies may refuse to insure some properties, or that some householders will be unable to afford to insure their homes against flood.

45.  The Association of British Insurers told us that the insurance industry has worked with the Government to agree a Statement of Principles which sets out the industry's intention to continue to offer flood insurance for as many domestic customers as possible, provided that the Government takes steps to manage flood risk. It said:

46.  We welcome the insurance industry's Statement of Principles on flood cover. However, we are concerned that some areas may become uninsurable should flood risk increase as the result of climate change. We recommend that the Government identify which areas will face the greatest problems in getting insurance. The Government should then explore alternative ways in which people in these areas can manage their flood risk.



29   www.foresight.gov.uk/fcd.html Back

30   Q237 Back

31   Evs 112-113, paras 4-7; Evs 140-141, paras 6.3, 7.3-7.4; Q297 Back

32   Agriculture Committee, Sixth Report of Session 1997-98, Flood and Coastal Defence, HC 707-I, para 9 Back

33   Q299. Occupants of low-cost housing may find it particularly difficult to afford flood insurance and the costs of repairing their homes in the event of flood. Back

34   Ev 76, para 4.7 Back

35   Environment, Transport and the Regions Committee, Second Report of Session 2000-01, Development on, or affecting, the flood plain, HC 64 Back

36   Ev 33, para 8 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 September 2004