Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 37-39)

17 MAY 2004

MR MEURIG RAYMOND AND MS ELIZABETH HOGBEN

  Q37 Chairman: Mr Raymond, welcome. It would be useful if you could introduce yourself and Ms Hogben and say who you are and whom you are representing.

  Mr Raymond: Thank you, Chairman. My name is Meurig Raymond, Vice-President of the National Farmers' Union of England and Wales representing 130,000 members. May I introduce Elizabeth Hogben, our Deputy Director in our Brussels office.

  Ms Hogben: Also I used to be the food science adviser at the NFU based in London covering topics such as GM crops and biotechnology.

  Q38 Chairman: You have obviously got a taste from those who are against GM and you might want to listen to the third session, those who will be advocating a GM regime. I think it would help me to know where you think your members are, and, therefore, the NFU representing their views, in terms of this issue of the tolerance level which we took some time at the beginning of that last session trying to deal with. Do you think the 0.9% is a realistic and fair way of deciding whether a particular product is GM or not GM?

  Mr Raymond: Thank you. I will open and then Elizabeth can pick up the technical issues. Obviously we have consulted with our membership over the years on this issue of GM, we have listened to our members' views and, as far as the tolerance level is concerned, we believe 0.9% is reasonable. It has to be practical, it has to be workable, it has to deliver and I think as far as the NFU is concerned we do desperately need a system that is deliverable and practical at farmer level.

  Ms Hogben: It may be worth bearing in mind that we do not see it as our position as a farming organisation to set threshold levels. However, we are concerned, as the Vice-President has said, that they have to be practical, that is the main concern, and should take into account actual farming practice rather than what is technically possible in terms of detection levels.

  Q39 Chairman: So what are you going to say to a member who actually thought that they were going to be classified as a GM-free producer and yet they have gone above the 0.9% threshold? Is that a case that you think is going to happen sooner rather than later if GM is allowed to be grown commercially?

  Mr Raymond: All farmers sell on contract and they have to abide by those contracts. If 0.9% is the threshold level we are fairly convinced the majority, all farmers, will abide by that contract. We have seen it in the past, we have seen it in seeds that are purchased, that farmers will sell on contract and those contracts dictate what those thresholds are to be.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 8 July 2004