Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 188-199)

3 DECEMBER 2003

MS LINDA HINGLEY

  Q188 Chairman: Good afternoon.

  Ms Hingley: Do you want me to start with a brief statement about what I do or do you want to start straight as you did with the other gentleman?

  Q189 Chairman: I think we would probably like to ask questions and if at the end there is something critical that you think we have not covered, then feel free to mention it.

  Ms Hingley: As you know, it is a huge issue and I am very passionate about it.

  Q190 Chairman: Well, I would try and contain that. Welcome to the Committee. You know the purpose of our session.

  Ms Hingley: Yes, and thank you for allowing me to come.

  Q191 Chairman: You have give us written evidence for which we thank you. Can you tell the Committee what the evidence is this year for what is happening on Devon's beaches and I do not know if you know for Cornwall as well, and why is it that it is dolphins that you find and not the porpoises?

  Ms Hingley: Well, I just cleared a dead dolphin yesterday off a Devon beach. The autumn ones have already started. As you know, this year is the worst year on record for Devon and Cornwall beaches. The main dolphins that I clear are common dolphins and they are seasonal. It is only in the winter months that I get common dolphins washed ashore and we know virtually how they are being killed now and I do not think there is any argument about that. It is the pelagic fishery in particular, the bass pair trawlers that are definitely killing the common dolphin and this is proven from the post mortem reports and from the observer scheme that Defra ran three years ago. I also get porpoises. Interestingly, the porpoises that I get are not seasonal, but they are all year round and they do correspond with neaps, neap tides. As you know, you get high tides and low tides and neap tides are when the tide is at its lowest and that is interesting because that is actually when a lot of the set netters are working. They actually have to work neaps and not the tops of the tides, as they call it, so it is very interesting that when I do get porpoises wash in, it does correspond to the fishery that we know would have a problem with them.

  Q192 Chairman: And are they autopsied?

  Ms Hingley: They are autopsied, yes. Interestingly, and I am going to be absolutely straight on this, some of the porpoises that we send off for post mortem have died of natural causes, but most of the porpoises that we send off are actually by-catch and are proven to be by-catch, but we do get porpoises occasionally that have high worm burdens, worm infestations, and we get them with secondary pneumonia. Porpoises, as you know, are the smallest cetacean in our waters and they do have a real problem with pollution. Their nature of feeding is that they are bottom feeders, so they are very different from dolphins. They are bottom feeders, so they dig in the sand and the mud and they do pick up a lot more pollutants and things that are around in the river estuaries which is where they feed, so to be absolutely fair, you do get sick porpoises occasionally, but you would never get sick common dolphins. All the common dolphins that I send off are so healthy I cannot tell you.

  Q193 Mr Lazarowicz: Why is the pelagic sea bass fishery particularly prone to common dolphin by-catch, do you think?

  Ms Hingley: I do not know if you have had a look at the evidence that I put in, but I did actually say the reasons why the bass pair trawl fishery is particularly devastating to common dolphins. First and foremost, it is a massive trawl, it is a huge trawl, it really is. Secondly, it is pulled very fast through the water at about eight knots, which is not very fast for a dolphin, but very fast if you have got a huge trawl and a dolphin swimming into it going the other way. Thirdly, and this is very important, they are towed for very long periods of time and we are talking about from dawn till dusk, sometimes eight to ten hours, and there are very few fisheries that have their gear in the water for that length of time. For example, the pelagic fishery, which we know can catch and kill dolphins, I know pelagic fishermen and if they are targeting sprats or mackerel, their gear sometimes is only in the water—this is a pelagic single trawl—for 10 or 20 minutes. These boats are highly sophisticated. They do not want to waste time finding fish. What they do is they go out there, they find the shoal of fish on their fish-finding apparatus and they zap it, so, in other words, your gear is only in the water for a short period of time. If dolphins are around in that short period of time, yes, they could be caught and killed, but the chances are that the dolphins have more of a chance of escape. If you have got a massive phing going through the water at quite a high speed, eight to ten knots, for ten hours and you have got the opening, which I put in my evidence, which can be from the surface to the bottom of the sea, nothing is going to stand a chance, nothing

  Q194 Mr Lazarowicz: I think you advocate suspending the fishery—

  Ms Hingley: Yes, I would love to see it banned, yes.

  Q195 Mr Lazarowicz: —until a method for preventing the by-catch can be found?

  Ms Hingley: Yes.

  Q196 Mr Lazarowicz: Do you think there are methods which can be worked out to prevent this by-catch?

  Ms Hingley: No, I do not. I do not know what method you could use. With the Scottish bass pair trawls, they are so huge and they are devastating. They have done so much damage to the common dolphins in the English Channel over the last 10 or 15 years. Defra's own figures are so damning on this, I do not see how we can see these dead bodies washing in, and I just do not think there is anywhere to go on this. I think we have to ban it. What I would have loved to have done is to have banned it for one season, just suppose we banned it for one season, and see what is washing up in Devon and Cornwall. Let's just see. Ban it for one season and let's just see what we have washing up on our beaches.

  Q197 Mr Lazarowicz: But if your supposition was correct, the logical conclusion to your position would be that the fishery would be closed, not suspended, and closed indefinitely. Is that not correct?

  Ms Hingley: Yes, and I would like to say that I speak as a person from the fishing industry. As you know, I have been involved with the fishing industry for 25 years when I married a fisherman 25 years ago. For 12 years I have been a part-owner of a beam trawler. My whole income is derived from the fishing industry. I have nothing to gain from banning the bass pair trawl fishery because our boat does not really catch very much bass at all and we do not target bass. A beam trawler is for flat fish, it is on the bottom and we target bottom fish. I can honestly tell you that the only reason I got involved with what I am involved with now is because I was devastated to find out how much damage is going on in an industry that I actually love, respect and admire. I am afraid this is an industry which is a wonderful industry which has been hideously mis-managed, it is motivated by total greed and it needs a complete clean-up. I am afraid there are ways to catch bass which do not kill dolphins and those are what we should be looking at. This is an industry which was banned in America six years ago on conservation grounds totally and I was not aware that the Americans have got a tremendously good eco-friendly record. I think the only way to approach the bass pair trawl fishery in the English Channel is to ban it until we know that we have got absolute categoric proof of designs or mitigation methods that are going to protect dolphins. There is no other way out of this. Let me just say, there is one thing that you could do, and I have spoken to a lot of fishermen about this. I have said, "What would you do?", and they have said, "Well, there is evidence to show", and the Defra observers proved this, "that smaller pair trawlers do not catch dolphins". The gear is much smaller, the trawls are much smaller, so if you are going to tinker with the fishing industry, and you cannot tinker with the fishing industry, as you know, because how do you tell a bloke who has a 1,200 horsepower boat to suddenly go out, flog it and buy one that is 300 horsepower, it is like dis-inventing the wheel, but small is beautiful, I am afraid, and I am afraid that in this particular issue there is evidence that shows that smaller horsepower does not catch dolphins purely because the gear is so much smaller. In other words, if you had two boats that were 300 horsepower towing a trawl, it would be much, much smaller and it would have to be. Do you get my drift? It is 600 horsepower in total. The boats that are working off Start Point, which is the area off Devon where all of these dolphins are washing in that I deal with at the moment, they are massive. They are 1,200 or 1,500 horsepower, 2,000 horsepower, so those two combined, that is the power. It is power, pure power that is pulling that amount of gear through the water.

  Q198 Mr Lazarowicz: If the measures that you want to see put in place were taken, would there not be calls from the industry for government compensation?

  Ms Hingley: Yes, there would have to be, I am afraid, yes. I would not like to talk about that because I think you need to ask your fisheries representatives about that.

  Q199 Mr Lazarowicz: But if this activity is so morally reprehensible, why should the Government, why should the public purse compensate people for this?

  Ms Hingley: Well, that is a good point. There is one point I would like to make. As you know, the common dolphins are killed in the main, we think, by the bass pair trawlers. As you know, the bass pair trawlers only work in the English Channel in the winter months and the season is actually quite small. They have started working now, but the actual bass season is only from the 1 January to 30 March, so we are only talking about three months. Now, these trawlers are actually working elsewhere for the rest of the year and they are doing other fisheries, so in actual fact they are not totally reliant on this fishery for all of their income as they do other things as well. I suggest they go back and they do their other things. That is what I suggest they do.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 January 2004