Select Committee on European Scrutiny First Report


12 Customs

(24790)

11837/03

COM(03) 452

Commission Communication on a simple and paperless environment for customs and trade.

Commission Communication on the role of customs in the integrated management of external borders.

Draft Regulation to amend Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code.

Legal base(For the draft Regulation) Articles 26, 95, 133 and 135 EC; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentHM Customs and Excise
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 20 November 2003
Previous Committee ReportHC 63-xxxi (2002-03), paragraph 3 (10 September 2003)
To be discussed in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentLegally and politically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

12.1 In September 2003 we considered, but did not clear, a three-part document. In the first part the Commission suggests simplification and rationalisation of customs regulations and procedures, proposing an electronic, paperless environment for customs and trade. In the second part the Commission proposes rationalisation of the management of customs controls through a common strategy for goods. The third part of the document is a draft Regulation to amend the Community Customs Code Regulation. We welcomed the intention both to simplify customs procedures and to rationalise the customs role in the management of the Community's external borders. But we were concerned to know the Information Commissioner's view of the draft Regulation allowing access by non-customs agencies to the electronically-based information of customs administrations.

The Minister's letter

12.2 The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo) sends us the response of the Information Commissioner and says:

    "The Information Commissioner is broadly content with the proposals relating to data protection, subject to a few observations, which I summarise below together with the Government's comments.

    "Comments of the Information Commissioner — Paragraphs 2 and 3

    "The Information Commissioner mentions paragraph 4 of the Recital [of the draft Regulation], stating that he is unsure how far the communication of data under Article 15 [of the draft Regulation] will cover 'personal data' and that if it does then the personal data communicated should be the minimum required to achieve the intended purpose. However, he is content that data provisions already in force will cover this point. The Government shares that view and confirms that any data communicated would be the minimum necessary. The Government accepts his point that the phrase 'in order to protect the security of citizens and businesses, or to prevent or detect irregularities' could be interpreted widely and so will propose his suggested amendment to substitute 'crime' for 'irregularities'.

    "Comments of the Information Commissioner — Paragraph 4

    "As the Information Commissioner notes, the existing Article 15 [of the Community Customs Code Regulation] already contains the requirement to obtain the permission from those who provide such information before disclosure. The Government already operates according to this principle.

    "Comments of the Information Commissioner — Paragraph 5

    "The Information Commissioner's final observation relates to the statement in the amending Regulation's Explanatory Memorandum that the provisions on data protection in force will continue to apply and wonders whether Article 15 reflects that. In the Government's view, the final sentence of Article 15, paragraph 1 is intended to mean that Member States will need to take account of any legislation already in force in respect of data protection or in connection with legal proceedings when communicating information. The Government is entirely content with this requirement."

12.3 The Minister also updates us on the two earlier parts of the document. On the Commission Communication on a simple and paperless environment for customs and trade she tells us that the Italian Presidency has proposed a Council Resolution which calls on Member States to:

  • bring about improved co-operation based principally on electronic data exchange between the customs authorities and also between customs authorities and traders;
  • work with the Commission to introduce certification and acceptance of electronic signatures irrespective of the Member State in which the trader is established;
  • adapt national legislation, where necessary, so that sanctions in the customs area support the new legislative framework, ensuring that they are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

The resolution calls on the Commission to:

  • draw up a multi-annual strategic plan aimed at creating an electronic environment for the EU in the field of customs and indirect taxation;
  • draw up annual action plans, which evaluate the feasibility of the projects involved in the multi-annual strategic plan and monitor the implementation of these projects;
  • provide, as far as possible, its financial, technical and logistical support for implementation of these objectives.

12.4 As for the Commission Communication on the role of customs in the integrated management of external borders, the Minister says that the Italian Presidency has proposed Council Conclusions (adopted on 4 November 2003) which are addressed both to Member States and the Commission and call for:

  • strengthening cooperation and information exchange between agencies and operators, and increasing cooperation with third countries, in particular those in neighbouring areas;
  • maximizing the effectiveness of the external border controls of goods by concentrating on consignments that pose a risk for safety and security, with other controls carried out wherever customs clearance can best be effected;
  • an equivalent level of protection at the external border of the European Union through the development of common risk criteria, leaving room for the application of appropriate national or regional criteria;
  • work towards integrated management of external borders, ensuring a close cooperation between the services responsible for the control of persons and those responsible for the control of goods;
  • an assessment of what control tools are considered to be appropriate and exploration of ways in which they could be financed;
  • the necessary complementary legal, regulatory and operational measures, where appropriate on the basis of Commission proposals, to accomplish these objectives.

Conclusion

12.5 We are grateful to the Minister for her response to our query about data protection and for the additional information she has provided. We have no further questions to ask on this document and now clear it.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 December 2003