Select Committee on European Scrutiny Third Report


12 Coordination of social security schemes

(a)

(19764)

5133/99

COM(98) 779

(b)

(24821)

12094/03

COM(03) 468

(c)

(24953)

12465/03

COM(03) 596

(d)

(25138)

16066/03


Draft Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No.1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community.

Draft Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No.1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No. 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71.

Amended draft Regulation on coordination of social security systems.


Draft Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 on the application of social security systems to employed persons, self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community.

Legal baseArticles 42 and 308 EC; co-decision; unanimity
Document originated(d) 12 December 2003
Deposited in Parliament(d) 15 December 2003
DepartmentWork and Pensions
Basis of consideration(d) Minister's letter and EM of 12 December 2003
Previous Committee Reports(a) HC 34-xviii (1998-99), paragraph 2 (5 May 1999), HC 34-xxvii (1998-99), paragraph 1 (21 July 1999), and HC 23-iv (1999-2000), paragraph 2 (15 December 1999)

(b) HC 63-xxxiii (2002-03), paragraph 16 (15 October 2003)

(a), (b) and (c) HC 63-xxxvii (2002-03), paragraph 4 (12 November 2003)

(d) None

To be discussed in Council22 December 2003
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decision(All) Cleared

The documents

12.1 Regulation (EEC) No.1408/71 makes provision for the coordination of Member States' social security schemes in order to protect the rights of people moving within the European Union.

12.2 In December 1998, the Commission presented a proposal (document (a)) for the simplification and modernisation of the 1971 Regulation. The proposal has been under discussion ever since.

12.3 Last July, the Commission made a further proposal (document (b)) to amend Regulation 1408/71 so as to reflect recent changes in national legislation and decisions of the European Court of Justice.

12.4 In September, the European Parliament adopted 47 amendments to the Commission's proposal of December 1998. Document (c) sets out the European Parliament's amendments and explains why the Commission was willing to accept most of them but not others.

12.5 When we considered documents (a), (b) and (c) in November, we concluded that we would be unable to reach a view on any of the three documents until the disagreements on all three of them had been settled and we could see a complete revised text.[22]

12.6 Document (d) supersedes documents (a), (b) and (c). It is the revised text of the proposed Regulation except for three of the Annexes. The revised text reflects the agreements reached by the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (ESPHCA) on 1 December. The revised text also reflects the ESPHCA's conclusions on the amendments the European Parliament had proposed.

The Government's view

12.7 In his letter of 12 December, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for Work and Pensions (Mr Chris Pond) tells us that four main issues needed to be resolved by the ESPHCA on 1 December. They were:

  • which Member State should be responsible for paying unemployment and family benefits;
  • retention of unanimity in decision-making by the Administrative Commission on coordination of social security systems;
  • recovery of overpaid benefits and underpaid contributions; and
  • transitional provisions.

12.8 The Minister says that the Presidency put a text to the Council on 1 December which reflected an agreed position on all of these matters except the question of the Member State which should be responsible for the payment of unemployment, family and healthcare benefits to frontier and seasonal workers who have worked in one Member State but live in another.

12.9 The Council reached agreement on a compromise which provides that:

  • the Member State of residence would be responsible for healthcare and family benefits;
  • the Member State of residence would be responsible for paying unemployment benefit but would be reimbursed for up to five months by the State of former employment if the unemployed person had worked in the State of employment for 12 of the preceding 24 months; and
  • Luxembourg would have the right to reach bilateral agreements with Belgium, France and Germany on the reimbursement of unemployment benefit payments.

12.10 The Minister also tells us that there is agreement on eight of the eleven Annexes. The remaining three Annexes are more complex or contentious. They are:

  • Annex II which deals with bilateral agreements remaining in force;
  • Annex X which deals with special non-contributory benefits; and
  • Annex XI which contains special provisions for the application of the legislation in each Member State.

12.11 It appeared unlikely that an agreed position could be reached on these three Annexes by 22 December. Accordingly, the Presidency proposed that the Annexes should be left blank for now, the contents to be discussed further and settled before the rest of the Regulation comes into effect.

12.12 The Minister regards this as a sensible and pragmatic approach. The Government has no particular concerns about either Annex II or Annex XI (although some other Member States have). But the Government has serious concerns about Annex X because it wishes to ensure that UK disability benefits remain unexportable.

12.13 The Irish delegation has indicated that its Presidency will aim to achieve completion of the three outstanding Annexes before May 2004. When they have been drafted, the proposed texts of the Annexes will be subject to parliamentary scrutiny.

12.14 The Minister's Explanatory Memorandum of 12 December brings us up to date on the 47 amendments to the previous draft of the Regulation which had been proposed by the European Parliament. As we noted when we considered those amendments in November,[23] the Government found only a minority of them unacceptable. The Minister tells us that on 1 December the Council, with the Government's concurrence, accepted most of the amendments in whole or part because they reflected decisions already made by the ESPHCA.

12.15 The Minister concludes his letter to us as follows:

"I know that the Committee has been concerned about the length of time it has taken to complete work on the simplification and modernisation of Regulation 1408/71. This has been an intensive four and a half years' effort requiring a line by line examination of text as it applies to the very different social security systems of Member States. We have now reached the stage where the bulk of the work has been completed and we now have a text which is acceptable to the UK. This is the text which will go to the 22 December Council for political agreement. I would very much hope that the Committee would be minded to agree to lift its scrutiny reserve to enable the agreement to be reached.

"I very much share the Committee's views about the need to resolve differences about exportability of tax-funded benefits. However, this aspect has been removed from the text going to Council and will be dealt with as a separate dossier under the Irish Presidency…Any agreement on the lifting of the reserve on the simplification dossier would be on the clear understanding that our Parliamentary reserve on the outstanding items will be maintained. I hope that this gives the Committee the reassurance it seeks".

Conclusion

12.16 We are glad that, after so much time and effort, agreement is near on this important proposal to simplify and modernise the Union legislation on social security systems. We are grateful to the Minister and his Department for keeping us regularly and helpfully informed of the progress of the negotiations.

12.17 We share the view that it is sensible to reach political agreement now on all but Annexes II, X and XI of document (d). We have no questions to put to the Minister on the text of the document and we clear it from scrutiny.

12.18 Revised texts of Annexes II, X and XI do not yet exist. When they are available, we shall need to consider them, and particularly the proposed treatment of UK disability benefits. Meanwhile, we keep under scrutiny the matters to be covered by the three Annexes.

12.19 Document (d) supersedes documents (a), (b) and (c) and so we clear them from scrutiny.


22   See HC 63-xxxvii (2002-03), paragraph 4 (12 November 2003). Back

23   See HC 63-xxxvii (2002-03), paragraph 4 (12 November 2003). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 14 January 2004