Select Committee on European Scrutiny Ninth Report


28 Enterprise policy scoreboard 2003

(25123)

15036/03

SEC(03) 1278

Commission Staff Working Paper entitled "Benchmarking Enterprise Policy: Results from the 2003 Scoreboard"

Legal base
Document originated11 November 2003
Deposited in Parliament9 December 2003
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of considerationEM of 6 January 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

28.1 The Lisbon European Council of March 2000 set the EU the strategic goal for the next decade of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.

28.2 This annual Commission staff working paper reports on the 2003 scoreboard on competitiveness in the EU and aims to contribute to the debate on policy for securing a better environment for businesses. The scoreboard highlights areas where the EU has made progress in its aim to be more competitive and areas where it is lagging behind, particularly in comparison with the US. It also allows Member States to compare their performances in certain key areas. For the first time, it includes data on the EU Accession and Candidate Countries.

The Commission Communication

28.3 The paper covers performance in 2002, which it says was affected by an EU economy that was virtually stagnant. Summarising its conclusions, the Commission notes that:

  • Progress was made on:
    • Internet penetration;
    • falling communication costs;
    • a growing proportion of tertiary graduates in the 20-29 years old population;
    • a rising number of business angel networks;[60]
    • improved industrial eco-efficiency;
    • e-government;
    • reducing state aid and opening up public procurement.
  • Setbacks occurred as regards:
    • the continuing decline of the fledgling venture capital industry;
    • shrinking market capitalisation;
    • lower expenditure on Information Communication Technologies (ICT) ; and
    • a falling propensity to become self-employed.

28.4 Although the business environment as a whole has been improving slowly, there is no indication that the gap between the EU and the US has been narrowing. The EU is catching up in areas such as human capital and take-up of ICT but the gap in entrepreneurship, financial markets and innovation remains as wide as it was five years ago.

28.5 The eight chapters cover: access to finance; the regulatory and administrative environment; open and well-functioning markets; entrepreneurship; human resources; innovation and disseminating knowledge ("knowledge diffusion"); ICT; and sustainable development.

28.6 Access to finance. The slowdown in growth and the earlier bursting of the stock market bubble affected equity markets adversely. Market capitalisation dropped substantially in all Member States and nearly all found that new listings continued to decline. Venture capital markets experienced serious strains. One encouraging development was the increase since 1999, albeit modest, in the number of networks of business angels, notably in Sweden, Denmark, the UK, Spain and the Netherlands.

28.7 Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report that regulatory and administrative burdens remain high, especially in Germany, France and Austria. Many Member States now use the tool of regulatory impact assessments in an attempt to reduce this burden. In addition to the UK, both Ireland and Sweden have announced that they will submit all new business-related legislation to impact assessment by 2006.

28.8 The role of open and well-functioning markets is crucial for the growth of enterprises. However, the share of international transactions in the GDP of each Member State declined slightly, reflecting the general slowdown in EU economic growth. The indicator for trade integration in 2000, 2001 and 2002 shows the UK as low on the graph, but above the US. The paper makes the point that small Member States tend to present higher rates. Whilst Member States are generally reducing state aid and progress is being made in conforming to higher standards of transparency in public procurement, trans-border public procurement remains very low.

28.9 The rate of self-employment in 2002 remained generally stable, at just over 13%, but the propensity towards entrepreneurship, that is a preference for self-employment as a professional option, fell from 51% in 2000 to 45% in 2002. The female self-employment rate, at 10% lower than in the US, signals an under-utilisation of this potential.

28.10 Turning to human capital, the paper notes that, although the proportions are rising, tertiary graduates constitute a considerably smaller proportion of the population and the labour force in the EU than in the US. Little progress has been recorded in raising participation in activities related to life-long learning. However, performances in the UK, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands have all exceeded the EU target of 12.5%, since at least 2000.

28.11 A variety of indicators, such as patents, innovations or investment in research and development, show that the EU has yet to improve its performance on innovation and knowledge diffusion in a convincing manner. However, in the EU as well as in the US, the number of patents has been increasing since 2000.

28.12 The impact of ICT on productivity in recent years has been decisive. The EU's underperformance in productivity growth reflects in part weakness in the pace at which EU industries have made this effort to modernise. Data on 2001 and 2002 indicates that EU expenditure on ICT is catching up with that of the US. At over 5% of GDP, Sweden and Ireland took the lead, followed by the UK, Denmark and Finland, above the US. Whilst rates of use of the Internet by businesses have risen markedly across the Member States, e-commerce continues to be of secondary importance for businesses, with many buying rather than selling on-line.

28.13 EU manufacturers in virtually all Member States have made significant progress in improving eco-efficiency in recent years, with Ireland, Luxembourg, Finland and Germany showing the most dramatic improvements. This progress is a reflection of technological advances, particularly in the three most energy-intensive sectors of iron and steel, chemicals and the non-metallic mineral industries. The gradual increase in the share of services in GDP has also played a part. Progress has been made in reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, acidifying gases and ozone precursors. The candidate countries need to improve their performance in these areas.

The Government's view

28.14 The Minister of State for Industry and the Regions, and Deputy Minister for Women and Equality, at the Department of Trade and Industry (Jacqui Smith) comments that the paper is a factual background document with no direct policy implications. She adds, however, that the Commission may draw on this report, along with other evidence, when formulating and considering policy proposals.

Conclusion

28.15 The scoreboard provides a good deal of factual information and highlights once again the strengths and weaknesses of the EU economy. Whether these annual papers are of assistance in pointing to remedies is less certain, though they may help the Commission to formulate future policy proposals. Furthermore, whether the Member States would be seriously disposed to administer the medicines that might be proposed is also open to question.

28.16 The discrepancy between the sluggish performance of the EU and the higher growth in productivity in the US continues to be striking. Some comparisons in specific areas are instructive, but what is lacking is a comprehensive in-depth analysis of why the US does so much better. Possibly the Commission's draft Spring Report will make an authoritative contribution in this respect. According to press reports, it sets out in stark terms the reasons for the widening economic gap and warns that, without substantial improvements, "the Union cannot catch up on the United States" by 2015. It also warns that China and India are becoming key competitors. Apparently it spells out some improvements it believes are needed, which include basic reforms, such as the introduction of a single community patent and the recognition of professional qualifications across the EU.

28.17 We now clear the document.


60   Business angels are private informal investors in small start-up companies. They offer not only capital but also management assistance and often pave the way for venture capital investments. Business angels networks differ widely in size and approach, but may increase transparency in the markets for these informal investments. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 February 2004