Select Committee on European Scrutiny Fifth Report


17 Cooperation between Malta and Europol

(25188 )

Opinion of the Joint Supervisory Board in respect of the draft Agreement between Malta and the European Police Office

Legal base
Deposited in Parliament19 December 2003
DepartmentHome Office
Basis of considerationEM of 8 January 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (25008) File No. 3710-126: HC 42-i (2003-04), para 11 (3 December 2003)
To be discussed in CouncilFebruary 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

17.1 An independent Joint Supervisory Board (JSB) is responsible for reviewing the activities of the European Police Office (Europol) to ensure that the rights of the individual are not violated in its handling of personal data. The UK is represented on the JSB by the Information Commissioner.

17.2 The Director of Europol has authority to negotiate agreements with third states in order to prevent and combat organised cross-border crime affecting the Member States of the EU. The JSB must be consulted during the negotiation of all such agreements. The approval of agreements requires unanimity by the Council.

17.3 A draft agreement between Malta and Europol has been negotiated. It applies to all the areas of crime within Europol's mandate, including unlawful drug trafficking, smuggling of illegal immigrants, trade in human beings, motor vehicle crime, forgery and money laundering. Malta and Europol would be authorised to exchange not only relevant operational information but also specialist knowledge, organised crime situation reports and information on best practice. The draft agreement specifies the purposes for which information may be exchanged, together with the conditions for access to data and confidentiality requirements. Provision is also made for the exchange of liaison officers.

17.4 The Government supports the proposal and considers it important that Malta (and the other accession States) are able to cooperate with Europol as soon as possible. When a country joins the EU, it does not automatically become a member of Europol: it has to accede to the Europol Convention separately. That is why the proposed cooperation agreement with Malta is necessary in the short term.

17.5 When we considered the proposal in December,[34] we decided to keep it under scrutiny until we had seen the JSB's opinion on it.

The JSB's opinion

17.6 The JSB has reached the opinion that, from a data protection perspective, no obstacle exists to the draft agreement between Europol and Malta. The Board made three detailed suggestions for amendments to the agreement; they are intended to improve the clarity of the text. The Government tells us that the amendments have been incorporated in the text to be submitted to the Council for approval.

Conclusion

17.7 We recognise the importance of cooperation between Malta and Europol to help prevent and combat organised cross-border crime. We wished to be sure that the proposed agreement makes proper provision for data protection. We believe that the JSB's opinion provides that assurance and accordingly we clear the document from scrutiny.


34   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 29 January 2004