Select Committee on European Scrutiny Eleventh Report


16 Driving time limits

(24843)

12168/03

COM(03)490

Amended draft Regulation on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulation (EEC) 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport

Legal baseArticle 71 EC; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentTransport
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 23 February 2004
Previous Committee ReportHC 63-xxxv (2002-03), para 3 (29 October 2003)
To be discussed in Council9 March 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

16.1 The current Regulation[32] concerning the driving and rest times of drivers of heavy vehicles has been in force since 1985. The legislation was intended to provide a common set of Community rules for maximum daily and fortnightly driving times as well as daily and weekly minimum rest periods for all drivers of road haulage and passenger transport vehicles, subject to specified exceptions and derogations. It sets maximum limits on driving time and minimum requirements for breaks and rest periods for most heavy goods vehicle drivers and about half the bus and coach drivers operating in the UK. Enforcement is made possible by the requirements laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) 3821/85 for most drivers to use a tachograph to record their daily activities. However, according to the Commission, there have been difficulties in interpreting and applying the legislation.

16.2 We cleared a draft Regulation to replace the existing one in October 2002.[33] In October 2003 we considered an amended draft Regulation.[34] This amended draft Regulation replaces the Commission's earlier proposal. It seeks to clarify and simplify the existing legislation. Although it proposes some small changes to total driving times and rest periods, the changes do not materially change the main limits on driving and rest periods. It would also amend Council Regulation (EEC) 3821/85 on tachographs to rectify missing elements important to the enforcement of drivers' hours with digital tachographs.

16.3 We noted in relation to the new proposal that, despite a considerable revision of the original proposal, there were a number of issues on which the Government had reservations. We observed in particular that the extension of the scope of the legislation to cover vans between 2.8 and 3.5 tonnes had not been tested by the Commission against a cost-benefit analysis or a regulatory impact assessment. We said that before considering the document further we wanted to hear from the Minister about:

  • progress in getting from the Commission a cost-benefit analysis and a regulatory impact assessment;
  • the views of the road transport associations and other interested parties on the revised proposals; and
  • the Government's view of whether the revised proposal achieves a balance between the social and safety need to limit the driving hours required of drivers and the economic needs of the road transport industry and its customers.

The Minister's letter

16.4 The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport (Mr David Jamieson) writes now in response to our observations. Whilst saying the Commission is not obliged to provide a revised legislative financial statement on the potential costs of the amended proposal, or the specific costs involved in extending the scope to include drivers of light vans between 2.8 and 3.5 tonnes on international journeys, the Minister informs us that Member States, including the UK, have agreed recently that drivers of light vans of that weight should not be included in the new Regulation. The Irish Presidency has accepted this and has undertaken to amend the proposal accordingly.

16.5 The Minister tells us that only the Freight Transport Association (FTA) expressed a view on the Commission's revised proposal. Apart from sharing the Government's concerns about extending the scope of the draft Regulation to include drivers of light vans, the FTA is disappointed that the Commission failed to take account of its views on the need for continued exemption for drivers of vehicles used in connection with gas and electricity services, and for milk collection from farms. The Minister notes that the Government disagrees with this view, holding that the case for continued exemption should take account of the changes that have taken place in the road transport sector since the existing EU legislation was introduced and, in particular, the trend towards centralised and bulk collection and distribution and the contracting out of public services to private operators. However the Minister adds "But I cannot rule out the possibility that, as a result of pressure from certain Member States, some form of national derogation for milk operations might be reintroduced."

16.6 On the revised rules themselves, the Minister says the FTA welcomes the reinstatement of the provision allowing a regular daily rest period to be split, although it would prefer to see a split of 4+8 hours as opposed to the proposed 3+9 hours. It also welcomes the provision allowing drivers to take 36 hours reduced weekly rest (as opposed to 45 hours) at base. But the industry continues to express concern over the increase in daily rest to 12 hours (from 11) which remains unchanged from the original proposal, and about extending the obligation on undertakings to ensure compliance by drivers whom they do not themselves employ.

16.7 Finally, on whether the Government believes the revised proposal achieves a balance between the social and safety needs and economic needs the Minister says:

"Subject to the reservations expressed in the Explanatory Memorandum [of 8 October 2003] which we hope to address in negotiations, and the fact that the main elements of the existing Regulation, i.e. driving time limits and breaks remain virtually unchanged, I believe they do."

Conclusion

16.8 We are grateful to the Minister for his further comments. We note his expectation that remaining reservations on the proposal will be dealt with in further negotiations and have no further questions to ask. We clear the document.


32   Council Regulation (EEC) No.3820/85. Back

33   See (22856) 12934/01: HC 152-xxxviii (2001-02), para 18 (16 October 2002). Back

34   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 11 March 2004