Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twelfth Report


16 Annual report for 2003 on competitiveness

(25137)

15217/03

SEC(03) 1299

Commission Staff Working Paper — European Competitiveness Report 2003

Legal base
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 1 March 2004
Previous Committee ReportHC 42-v (2003-04), para 13 (14 January 2004)
To be discussed in CouncilNo discussion envisaged
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared (decision reported on 14 January 2004)

Background

16.1 The Lisbon European Council of March 2000 set the EU the goal for the next decade of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010. This annual Commission staff working paper aims to provide an analytical contribution to the debate on how to attain this goal by strengthening the competitiveness of European industry.

16.2 We cleared the document on 14 January 2004, but asked the Minister whether such a lengthy report served the intended purpose and justified the cost in terms of Commission staff time and effort, including translation.

The Minister's letter

16.3 The Minister of State for Industry and the Regions at the Department of Trade and Industry and Deputy Minister for Women and Equality (Jacqui Smith) says in her letter of 1 March 2004:

"It is my view that, despite its original 1994 auspices, this annual report now provides an important factual and analytical basis on which to benchmark progress towards the Council's year 2000 Lisbon goal. By monitoring the relative competitiveness of the EU, the report acts to provide a focus on competitiveness such that the need for corrective policies is highlighted along with analysis that can inform the policy debate. It is necessary for the Commission to produce a robust EU-wide view of competitiveness, which underpins much of DG Enterprise's work, including the Integrated Competitiveness Strategy.

"This said, I have sympathy with the Committee's view that the key elements of this annual report could be delivered in a much shorter, less resource intensive document, e.g. by removing the last three chapters, thus slimming the report to the contents of its first chapter — 'Growth, Productivity and Employment'. Whilst there is merit in the Commission's analysis provided in the remaining three chapters of last year's report, the issues addressed will not be uniformly policy relevant across all member states. Given this, I propose to incorporate the Committee's views regarding this DG Enterprise annual report within the next Commission Annual Budget Exercise."

Conclusion

16.4 We thank the Minister for responding promptly to our questions and are pleased to note that she intends to present our views to the Commission. The document in question is only one of a number of what we consider to be over-weight papers deposited recently.

16.5 The document was cleared on 14 January.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 25 March 2004