Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirteenth Report


19 Audit of Community finances

(25329)

5758/04

SEC(04) 79

Commission Action Plan to follow up the recommendations of the Court of Auditors in its Annual Report relating to the 2002 budgetary year

Legal base
Document originated27 January 2004
Deposited in Parliament4 February 2004
DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of considerationEM of 5 March 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNone planned
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

19.1 As part of the process of discharge by the European Parliament and the Council (the final stage of the budgetary cycle) the Commission is required to present an action plan based on its responses to the annual report of the European Court of Auditors (ECA). We recommended the ECA's report for 2002 for debate, with other documents related to proper management of the Community's resources; this took place on 23 February 2004.[43]

The document

19.2 The Commission's Action Plan relating to the 2002 budgetary year examines measures to be implemented to improve financial management and thus gain in future satisfactory Statements of Assurance (such statements are frequently referred to as a DAS, from the French "déclaration d'assurance"). The document responds under twelve subject headings to 147 recommendations by the ECA. In each section covering the twelve subjects the Commission summarises the ECA comments and its own responses and sets out its full response and intended actions alongside each detailed recommendation.

19.3 The Commission deals with 19 recommendations under the heading "Actions Resulting from the DAS for 2002". The practical improvements made include:

  • setting up an Accounting Standards Committee to examine accounting entries and how a recording base which remains comparable over the years can be achieved;
  • setting up a system of reporting to authorising departments of forecasts of revenue and recovery orders which are overdue;
  • an accounting standard for pre-financing payments; and
  • updated guidelines for producing the annual activity reports of Directorates-General.

19.4 Six responses under the heading "Budget Implementation" include information on:

  • a project to support access to credits for small farmers and small and medium-sized enterprises in rural areas of candidate countries to counter previous difficulties in pre-financing projects; and
  • improved procedures in forecasting spending on Structural Funds.

19.5 Included in the proposed actions in response to the six comments under "Own resources" are:

  • an audit in 2004 of the special risks to the control regime at airports; and
  • better presentation of VAT statements.

19.6 In relation to the heading "Common Agricultural Policy" the Commission gives 15 replies which include proposed action to solve problems and weaknesses identified in:

  • butter disposal measures, the aid scheme for cotton and the market in dried fodder;
  • pre-financing and rate setting of export refunds; and
  • support for less favoured areas.

19.7 Responses to 23 recommendations on "Structural Operations" include undertakings on:

  • pursuing a "contract of confidence" initiative, which will enable the Commission to rely more directly on national audit work;
  • carrying out a three-phase audit approach to gain assurance with regard to the legality and regularity of underlying expenditure on the 1994-99 programming period;
  • planning a follow-up audit to verify improvements in the management and control systems of the Welsh authorities; and
  • improving cost-benefit analyses.

19.8 Dealt with in the Commission's 13 replies on "Internal Policies" are:

  • peer review of the 2002 annual activity reports;
  • monitoring of the quality of external audits; and
  • seven matters related to the LIFE (the financial instrument for the environment) programme.

19.9 The 16 comments on the "External Actions" heading include the following commitments:

  • independent external auditors to provide assurance for spending by the implementing organisations of external aid, and for audits of spending by the EuropeAid Cooperation Office or of external EU delegations;
  • absorption-capacity building in countries assisted through TACIS (grant-financed assistance to 12 Eastern European and Central Asian countries); and
  • concentrating development assistance to India on the health and education sectors.

19.10 The Commission replies to 21 recommendations on "Enlargement". These include proposed action on:

  • a review of the closure audit strategy for the PHARE (aid for new Member States) programme by the end of 2004;
  • verifying checking procedures within the SAPARD (agriculture and rural development aid for new Member States) programme; and
  • introduction in 2004-06 of Neighbourhood Programmes, covering the external border of the expanded EU, to improve coordination between the various aid instruments (PHARE, TACIS etc.) operating in eastern Europe.

19.11 Responses to the six comments under the "Administrative Expenditure" heading include :

  • an action plan to improve management of risks and weaknesses as a result of the Commission's own Internal Control and Risk Self-Assessment; and
  • an evaluation report on the management of leave and absence, which will lead to new measures.

19.12 The Commission makes 11 replies to recommendations on "Financial Instruments". These include:

  • an "Internal Audit Capability" audit, which would risk-assess banking operations and related treasury activities; and
  • a plan to deal with the remaining observations and recommendations of a report on the loans and borrowings for the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC).

19.13 On the eight recommendations on the "European Development Fund (EDF)" the Commission includes the following points:

  • the Commission adopted in October 2003 a Communication on integrating the EDF into the budget; and
  • reorganisation of Commission procedures on drawing up and monitoring of contracts to spend EDF money in African, Caribbean and Pacific countries is currently being implemented.

19.14 The Commission's two replies under the heading "European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)" are:

  • the management and control functions for the ECSC have been separate since the end of December 2002; and
  • the Commission will study setting up an inventory of patents filed by organisations that received ECSC aid.

The Government's view

19.15 The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Ruth Kelly) says:

"The Government welcomes this Commission Action Plan, which demonstrates once again that the ECA's recommendations are being taken seriously.

"The Commission's management and control systems have been criticised by the ECA for the ninth year running, but changes are taking place. The UK welcomes the establishment of an Accounting Standards Committee to look at ways of drawing comparisons on accounting standards from year to year, and also the improvement of IT systems to allow for better bookkeeping and clearing of prefinancing payments. Such measures are positive steps on the road to getting a positive Statement of Assurance (DAS) for the whole EU Budget.

"The UK recognises and agrees with the Court's criticisms that budget implementation must be improved. Measures such as the improvements to procedures in forecasting spending on Structural Funds, mentioned in the Action Plan, will help to reduce the large and regular budget surpluses over time. The Government agrees with the Court's recommendation that the Commission should use the Amending Budget procedure to amend the budget in-year if there is a large surplus next year.

"The Government appreciates that the different sectors of the Community budget give rise to differing problems and is pleased that the Commission has introduced proposals for sector-specific remedial measures, whether they be the raft of new regulations to solve problems in butter, cotton or dried fodder in Agriculture; the 'contract of confidence' initiative in Structural Funds that will mean audit resources are deployed more efficiently; the Neighbourhood Programmes in eastern Europe to [make] aid measures there more effective; or the improvements to the annual activity reporting process in internal administration to make annual measurements more meaningful and comparable."

Conclusion

19.16 The document is a useful reminder of the sorts of matters which prevent the European Court of Auditors from issuing positive Statements of Assurance and of the Commission's efforts to correct these. We clear the document.


43   See (25165) OJ C 286 Vol 46: HC 42-v (2003-04), para 3 (14 January 2004) and Stg Co Deb, European Standing Committee B, 23 February 2004, cols. 3-30. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 1 April 2004