Select Committee on European Scrutiny Eighteenth Report


9 Gender equality in development co-operation

(24807)

11923/03

COM(03) 465

Draft Council Regulation on promoting gender equality in development cooperation

Legal baseArticle 179 EC; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 2 April 2004
Previous Committee ReportHC 63-xxxii (2002-03), para 24 (17 September 2003);

HC 42-xi (2003-04), para 13 (25 February 2004)

To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared (decision reported on 17 September 2003)

Background

9.1 The Regulation has replaced an existing Regulation ((EC) No. 2836/98), which expired on 31 December 2003. The purpose is to continue measures to promote gender equality in Community development co-operation policies.

9.2 The 1998 Regulation set out a dual approach, combining "mainstreaming" of gender equality across the whole development programme with specific measures to promote gender equality funded from a separate budget allocation. When we considered the proposal on 17 September 2003, we noted that the Government supported the Regulation but was not in favour of a separate budget line being retained. However, we considered that it was likely to provide greater transparency. We asked to be kept informed of progress.

The Minister's letter of 31 January

9.3 In his letter to us of 31 January 2004, the Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Hilary Benn) said that Member States had welcomed the proposed Regulation and generally felt that, while there was some validity in the Government's view that the continuation of a separate thematic budget line was inconsistent with the agreed policy of mainstreaming gender issues across all the Community's development programmes, a separate budget line would act as a catalyst for activities to promote gender equality; and it had therefore been agreed that it should continue.

9.4 The Minister added that the main matter still at issue with the European Parliament was its proposed increase in the financial provision of the budget line from €9 to €11 million for the period 2004-2006, which the UK opposed because no justification had been provided. Discussions were continuing. A further progress report was promised. As we shared the Minister's view on this, we asked, to be told, in particular, what agreement was reached on the budget.

The Minister's letter of 2 April

9.5 In his letter of 2 April, the Minister recounts the history of the proposal and reports that a Common Position was reached on 19 February whereby 20 of the European Parliament's amendments were accepted, which the Council considered improved the text of the draft Regulation, and the budgetary increase was rejected. The Common Position was approved by the European Parliament at its 29 March-1 April plenary session. The Minister says: "I consider this to be a very satisfactory outcome".

Conclusion

9.6 We agree with the Minister's assessment of the outcome. We are grateful to him for having reported to us so comprehensively, and thank him for the part he has played in securing the right result.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 12 May 2004