Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-First Report


18 Materials intended to come into contact with food

(25073)

15113/03

COM(03) 689

Draft Regulation on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food

Legal baseArticle 95 EC; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentFood Standards Agency
Basis of considerationSEM of 14 May 2004
Previous Committee ReportHC 42-iii (2003-04), para 14 (17 December 2003)
To be discussed in CouncilNo longer applicable
Committee's assessmentLegally and politically important
Committee's decisionCleared (decision reported on 17 December 2003)

Background

18.1 Council Directive 89/109/EEC[46] establishes that, as a general principle, the migration of materials which come into contact with food should be kept to a minimum and not endanger human health, and that it should not affect the composition, smell or taste of the food in question. The Directive also provides for the establishment of "positive" lists of substances which may be used in the manufacture of food contact materials, identifies the groups of materials and articles to be regulated by implementing measures, and sets out the procedures and criteria to be followed in drafting and adopting such measures.

18.2 According to the Commission, a number of new issues — such as the emergence of "active" packaging (designed to interact with the food in order to maintain or improve its condition during storage and so prolong its shelf life) and packaging involving "intelligent" materials (which provide information about the condition of the food) — had arisen since that Directive was adopted. It therefore sought to take these into account in this proposal, which it put forward in November 2003. In our Report of 17 December 2003, we noted that the UK supported the proposal, which it believed should improve the clarity and extent of control of chemical migration from packaging to food, help to overcome the ambiguities which can arise from the transposition of detailed rules by each Member State; and deal with emerging technologies in a balanced manner. In view of this, and the fact that the proposal did not appear to give rise to any issues of principle or of practical difficulty for the UK, we cleared it.

Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum

18.3 We have now received a supplementary Explanatory Memorandum of 14 May from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health at the Department of Health (Miss Melanie Johnson), drawing our attention to a number of amendments made to the original proposal as a result of the co-decision procedure. She says that these changes, which are supported by the UK, improve the clarity of the proposal, and that, following its adoption by the European Parliament, the amended proposal now awaits adoption by the Council as an "A point" (without discussion).

18.4 However, the Minister also says:

"The UK has formally registered with the Council its view that the (EC) Article 95 Treaty base for the proposal is wrong and should involve (EC) Article 308. Two cases are being brought to the European Court to challenge the Treaty base where central administrative systems are being put in place by Commission proposals. This is not one of those two cases, but, along with other proposals currently being negotiated, it contains a similar proposal to that which is the subject of the UK's legal challenge. The current legal base requires adoption of the proposal by a qualified majority vote; the UK's assertion that Article 308 should be the legal base requires unanimity."

Conclusion

18.5 The Minister did not express any reservation about the legal base in the Explanatory Memorandum and initial Regulatory Impact Assessment which she sent us on 8 December 2003, and we find it strange that the point should have emerged only at this very late stage. Having said that, we do not think it (or the amendments made as part of the deal reached between the Council and European Parliament) need affect our earlier clearance of the proposal, and we are therefore simply drawing the current position to the attention of the House.





46   OJ No. L 40, 11.2.89, p.38. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 17 June 2004