Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Second Report


23 Proposed Rule of Law Mission to Georgia

(25724)

Draft General Concept for the Proposed ESDP Rule of Law Mission in Georgia

Legal base
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office
Basis of considerationEM of 8 June 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in Council14-15 June 2004 GAERC
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

23.1 The EU's immediate political objective in Georgia is to support to the transition process set off by the political changes at the end of 2003 through the full range of EU instruments and policies. The international community, in particular the EU, including through EU Member States' bilateral initiatives, is accordingly engaged in assisting Georgia, not least in the area of Rule of Law.

23.2 However, lack of strategy and co-ordination on the Georgian side is severely undermining good intentions. A new Government — many of whose members are young, ambitious and dynamic but lack experience in administration and reform processes — finds itself caught between the legacy of the old system, the challenges of bringing the country closer to international and European standards and raised public expectations for rapid and visible results. That Government has clearly expressed its aspirations for a closer relationship with the EU. The EU, in line with the European Security Strategy, has declared its willingness to assist through the range of EU instruments and policies. The new Government and the widespread support for improvements in the Rule of Law area accordingly present a window of opportunity for addressing key issues.

23.3 Following a request by the President of Georgia, the EU has been examining the launching of a rule of law mission to Georgia under the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). At the end of March, the Council Secretariat conducted an initial Fact Finding Mission (FFM), which concluded that there was broad support in Georgia for such a mission and that such a mission would not duplicate ongoing work. A subsequent more detailed FFM recommended that a small mission be launched, to monitor, mentor and train key officials in the areas of judicial independence and professionalism, the role of the prosecutor's office, and prison administration and the penitentiary service. Planning is now proceeding on the basis of its recommendations, with a formal decision to launch the mission likely to be taken later in June.

23.4 As the Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Mr Denis MacShane) explains in his 8 June Explanatory Memorandum, the EU has now reached the stage of agreeing the General Concept for this mission, which he summarises thus:

"It sets out the broad parameters for the mission, and will be the basis for more detailed future planning. The main issues covered in the draft General Concept include:

  Description of ongoing EU and International Community (IC) assistance: This outlines existing work in the field of Rule of Law to ensure that the Mission is developed in full co-ordination with existing programmes, and complements, rather than duplicates, their work.

  Description of the current Rule of Law situation in Georgia: This confirms the major and urgent challenges in this area, and in particular notes the need for a coherent approach to the problems and a better defined relationship between the key institutions involved in criminal justice reform.

  Objectives for the mission: These note that the mission should, in full co-ordination with, and in complementarity to, EC and other donors' programmes, assist in the development of a horizontal governmental strategy guiding the reform process for all relevant stakeholders within the criminal justice sector, including the establishment of an efficient mechanism for co-ordination and priority setting for the criminal justice reform. As such the mission would help develop an overall policy and improve top-level planning and performance capabilities in the areas identified as requiring urgent assistance. More specific objectives will be defined as planning proceeds. The EU is likely to assess progress through an internal review process against clear benchmarks.

  Methodology: The draft notes that the mission would assist the authorities of Georgia in drafting and adopting a comprehensive strategy guiding the reform process. Exact deployment will depend on a more detailed needs assessment during the planning phase of a possible mission.

  Legal Issues: The draft notes that an agreement on the status of an EU led Rule of Law mission should be concluded with the Georgian authorities.

  Personnel requirements: The mission would consist of a Head of Mission, Headquarter staff, and between 6-10 co-located experts.

  Timing: It is currently proposed that preliminary deployment will begin by mid-July and that it has an initial mandate of one-year.

  Costs: With the exception of the Head of Mission, it is planned that all personnel should be seconded from EU Member States. A rough estimation of the costs of a possible Rule of Law Mission in Georgia comprising approximately 10 international civilian experts are: start up costs of between €0.3 million (£0.199 million) and €0.4 million (£0.266 million) and yearly running costs of between €l million (£0.665 million) and €1.2 million (£0.798 million) (including per diems of €0.3 million (£0.199 million)).

  Co-ordination Issues: The draft outlines potential arrangements for co-ordination on the ground, between both different EU instruments and the rest of the international community, and in Brussels.

  Information Strategy: The mission will require a well prepared communications strategy, which should be co-ordinated with other actors in Georgia, in particular the European Commission. To this end a joint information strategy would be developed jointly by the Head of Mission and the Press office of the Council and the EC Delegation. Guidance would also come from an Information Strategy Team established in Brussels, and including representatives of both the Council Secretariat and European Commission."

The Government's view

23.5 The Minister says:

"The Government strongly supports the EU's intention to send a Rule of Law mission to Georgia under ESDP arrangements. It believes that a mission will help Georgia address the urgent challenges facing its judicial system, and assist Georgia in developing a co-ordinated overall approach to the legal reform process, in full complementarity with current EU and international (i.e. OSCE) assistance. The mission would be a clear and welcome expression of the EU's commitment at a crucial stage of Georgia's reform process. The Government welcomes the draft General Concept as a further step towards making this proposed mission a success. The draft is a good basis for the more detailed planning which will be required. The Government also strongly supports the ongoing development of civilian ESDP".

23.6 In addition to contributing towards the common costs of the mission according to the agreed EU GNP key (approximately 19%), the Minister say that "the UK may fund the cost of sending experts to participate in the mission, if suitable personnel and funding can be found".

Conclusion

23.7 It is inherently unsatisfactory to have to clear proposals without the benefit of an official text, but we understand the constraints imposed by the nature of the European Security and Defence Policy, and are grateful to the Minister for his helpful Explanatory Memorandum.

23.8 We have no questions to ask regarding the proposed mission, which, on the basis of what the Minister has been able to divulge, would appear to be timely, necessary and appropriately-tasked.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 24 June 2004