Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Fifth Report


6 Integration of environmental considerations into other Community policy areas

(25731)

10251/04

COM(04) 394

Commission Working Document: Integrating environmental considerations into other policy areas — a stocktaking of the Cardiff process

Legal base
Document originated1 June 2004
Deposited in Parliament9 June 2004
DepartmentEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs
Basis of considerationEM of 22 June 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilOctober or December 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

6.1 Article 6 of the Amsterdam Treaty requires environmental protection requirements to be integrated into other Community policies. This aim was given further formal expression at the European Council held in Cardiff in 1998, when the various sectoral Councils were asked to develop appropriate strategies, and by the adoption in 2001 of the Sustainable Development Strategy, requiring the pursuit of environmental goals alongside economic and social objectives. The European Council subsequently asked the Commission in 2003 to carry out an annual stocktaking of the Cardiff process, so as to enable it to assess progress each spring. The current document is the first such report.

The current document

6.2 The document recalls that the principle of environmental integration recognises that environmental policy alone cannot achieve the improvements needed as part of sustainable development, and says that, whilst improvements have been made, maintaining progress will be difficult as many of the more readily achievable steps have already been taken, requiring future efforts to focus increasingly on structural reforms.

6.3 The document then looks in turn at each of the nine sectors now covered by the process, noting the action which has been taken to date, and, more particularly, the opportunities for further environmental integration in the year to come. In each of the areas in question, the latter include the following:

AGRICULTURE

  • Improving environmental performance through cross-compliance; carrying out a mid-term evaluation of rural development policy; producing thematic strategies on the sustainable use of pesticides and soils; and an Action Plan to stimulate organic farming.

TRANSPORT

  • Proper implementation of the measures proposed in the Commission's White Paper on Transport Policy, including a continuation of efforts to shift the balance between different modes; specific actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and shipping, as envisaged in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme; setting standards for emissions of particulate matter and nitrogen oxide from diesel cars and trucks; implementation of the Trans-European Networks (TENs), with preference being given to projects shifting traffic from road to rail or sea; reviewing the voluntary commitments by passenger car manufacturers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions; measures to encourage the purchase of vehicles which use less energy and produce less pollution; and further measures to reduce risks of maritime accidents and their associated environmental impacts.

ENERGY

  • Timely implementation of the Directive on the promotion of electricity from renewable energy sources; the completion by Member States of national allocation plans under the Emissions Trading Directive; and the adoption of the national climate change strategies needed if Member States are to meet their burden-sharing targets under the Kyoto Protocol.

INDUSTRY

  • Adoption of the Commission's proposal for a new chemicals policy; the presentation of a Communication on sustainable production; the introduction of a Thematic Strategy on waste prevention and recycling, coupled with a strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources; an Action Plan on Innovation, aimed at further promoting clean technologies; and a new Programme on the Competitiveness of Enterprises, intended to foster progress towards the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy, including environmental integration.

INTERNAL MARKET

  • Adoption of a framework Directive on the eco-design of energy using products; a review of Community Guidelines on State Aid for Environmental Protection; and the submission of a proposal to make passenger car taxation more carbon dioxide efficient and more consistent with the internal market.

DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION

  • Reviewing the Community's Sustainable Development Strategy, so as to integrate better its internal and external pillars; carrying out a mid-term review of the country strategy papers funded under the Cotonou Agreement, in order to strengthen environment and development synergies; pursuing the Commission's initiatives on water and energy; taking forward the Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade, in particular by implementing a voluntary licensing scheme for timber exports and by carrying out a sustainability impact assessment; drawing up a mandate for the renegotiation of the International Tropical Timber Agreement; reviewing the Biodiversity Action Plan; and addressing the need for new financial means to help implement the Multilateral Environmental Agreements.

FISHERIES

  • Taking all the steps necessary to implement the agreed reforms of the Common Fisheries Policy; addressing the need to reduce further fishing effort on stocks under pressure; and bearing in mind the longer-term impact of climate change of the size and distribution of stocks.

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS

  • Fostering the use of flexible, market-based instruments to promote environmental protection; considering country-specific environmental recommendations for the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines; taking further action, using frameworks laid down by OECD, to highlight economically harmful subsidies, and to consider their removal; and consideration of more ambitious environmental targets for energy taxation.

TRADE AND FOREIGN POLICY

  • Taking on board the challenge presented by climate change; pursuing the European Neighbourhood Policy (Wider Europe) Initiative; building upon the European Green Diplomacy Initiative; and promoting a trade and environment agenda in the World Trade Organisation under the Doha Development Agenda.

6.4 The document also considers the need to improve delivery of environmental integration, in the light of the various shortcomings it suggests have arisen in the Cardiff process. The latter include a general lack of consistency in the commitment shown by different sectors, coupled with the need for a greater degree of political commitment and ownership by a number of Councils; improvement of delivery, implementation and review mechanisms; the need for a greater focus and clearer priorities in areas where action could be helpful; and the adoption of a strategic forward-looking approach, rather than simply seeking to respond to crises.

6.5 It then suggests that these aims could be better achieved by the European Council giving a clear policy signal; by sectoral Councils ensuring that emphasis is put on strategy implementation, on translating strategic aims into clear operational targets, on putting into practice strategy monitoring, and on updating and review mechanisms; and by extending environmental integration efforts into other sectors, notably tourism, research, cohesion policy and education. It believes that these aims should be underpinned by:

  • putting more emphasis on setting out how environmental integration can help to achieve other sectoral objectives;
  • developing innovative instruments to foster environmental integration, while minimising economic and social costs;
  • promoting thematic strategies as a tool for environmental integration;
  • implementing fully the Commission's new system of extended impact assessments;
  • raising awareness of environmental problems and the solutions available;
  • gathering and publishing information and data on the state of the environment;
  • implementing at national level the Directives on Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment; and
  • promoting a regular exchange of good integration practice at national, regional and local level.

The Government's view

6.6 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 22 June 2004, the Minister of State (Environment and Agri-Environment) at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Mr Elliot Morley) simply noted that the document has no direct impact, being essentially a retrospective summary of progress, and not a proposal for legislation. He also says that, because of this, no consultation is necessary.

Conclusion

6.7 As the Minister points out, much of this document simply summarises progress to date in the nine sectors currently covered by the Cardiff process. We are therefore clearing it, but, as it also provides an indication of the ways in which further integration might be achieved, we think it right to draw it to the attention of the House.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 13 July 2004