Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirty-Second Report


4 The fight against fraud

(a)

(25891)

11890/04

COM(04) 544

(b)

(25925)

11981/04

+ ADDs 1 and 2

COM(04) 573


Commission Communication: Protecting the Communities' financial interests — Fight against fraud — Action Plan for 2004-2005

Commission Report: Protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud — Annual report 2003

Legal base
Document originated(a) 9 August 2004

(b) 30 August 2004

Deposited in Parliament(a) 20 August 2004

(b) 8 September 2004

DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of considerationEM of 7 October 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in Council21 October 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decision(Both) For debate in European Standing Committee B

Background

4.1 The Commission is required by the Amsterdam Treaty to report annually on protection of the Communities' financial interests and on the fight against fraud. These reports are to cover measures taken by Member States as well as by the Commission.

4.2 In May 2001 the Commission adopted an action plan for the period 2001-2003. This was in the context of an overall approach in June 2000 to protection of the Communities' financial interests and on the fight against fraud for 2001-2005. This approach had four guidelines, to:

  • promote an anti-fraud policy;
  • promote a new culture of cooperation with Member States;
  • encourage an inter-institutional approach to prevent and combat corruption; and
  • strengthen the criminal judicial dimension resulting from the Treaties.[13]

The documents

4.3 Document (b) is the 2003 edition of the Commission's annual report on protecting the Communities' financial interests and fighting fraud. The report examines the action taken by national authorities and the Commission to prevent and fight against economic and financial crime. It is divided into two sections:

  • an evaluation of the Community's activities in 2003; and
  • measures taken by Member States pursuant to Article 280 EC.

The report is supplemented by two annexes:

  • the first covering follow-up to the Action Plan 2001-2003 and measures taken by the Member States together with an inventory of Member State activity; and
  • the second containing statistical and technical analyses.

4.4 In the first section of the report the Commission highlights:

  • anti-fraud policies promoted by the Commission, including specific recommendations to Member States in relation to the Structural Funds, a joint recovery task force comprising agents of OLAF (the European Anti-Fraud Office) and the Commission's Agriculture Directorate-General set up in relation to the Guarantee Funds and implementation of a fraud-proofing policy;
  • strengthening by the Commission of a culture of cooperation by extending the anti-fraud information system (AFIS) to the candidate countries and some third countries, activity relating to protection of the euro against counterfeiting and establishing the "Hercules" programme for the promotion of activities such as training, information-exchange and technical assistance;
  • inter-institutional developments to prevent and fight against corruption, including developing anti-fraud policy through preparation of legislation to improve OLAF and, in response to the Eurostat case, revising the code of conduct on the relations between Commissioners and their services; and
  • action taken by the Commission to strengthen the criminal judicial dimension resulting from the Treaties, including promoting debate on the creation of a European Public Prosecutor (EPP) at the Inter-Governmental Conference, setting out a "vision" of the development of OLAF in the context of an EPP with the former being an "auxiliary of justice" in the service of the latter, developments in cooperation between the Commission and judicial and police bodies, through extension of the Europol mandate and signature of an agreement on close coordination between OLAF's magistrates unit and Eurojust members.

4.5 The second section of the report gives an account of the measures taken by Member States in accordance with Article 280 EC to protect the Communities' financial interests. The section summarises:

  • the principal legislative developments in Own Resources,[14] agricultural expenditure and structural measures;
  • the organisation of departments responsible for the protection of the Communities' financial interests in relation to the Structural Funds;
  • measures taken to combat fraud and irregularity and to strengthen coordination and information exchange between departments within Member States; and
  • the administration of recovery procedures linking civil action to criminal proceedings.

4.6 The first of the two annexes describes in detail implementation during 2003 of the Action Plan 2001-2003 and measures taken by Member States in 2003 in implementation of Article 280 EC. This section contains the replies of Member States to the questionnaire sent to them in the preparation of this annual report.

4.7 The second annex contains a statistical analysis of irregularities, including fraud, in 2003. It also examines trends in the three main budget sectors. The annex shows that the total number of frauds and other irregularities notified in 2003 decreased, with the exception of the Own Resources sector. The budgetary implications of the irregularities were:

  • Own Resources — down 21% — from €342 million to €270 million;
  • the agricultural guarantee fund — down 21% — from €198 million to €169 million); and
  • Structural Funds — down 14% — from €614 million to €482 million.

These figures need careful interpretation — not all irregularity is fraud, most irregularities are the result of simple errors, and the outcome of one big case or the identification of a large-scale suspected fraud could skew the figures considerably from year to year.

4.8 Document (a) is the Commission's action plan for 2004-2005 — the remainder of the period covered by the 2000 overall strategy for 2001-2005. The document includes a summary of the overall results of the Action Plan 2001-2003, notably:

  • promotion of anti-fraud legislative policy;
  • development of a new culture of co-operation;
  • encouraging inter-institutional measures to prevent and combat corruption, including implementation of the new Financial Regulation and evaluation of OLAF; and
  • strengthening the criminal judicial dimension through legislation, including entry into force of the first Fraud Convention.

4.9 In setting out the second phase of the 2001-2005 programme the Commission follows the four guidelines in the overall approach and also takes into account new guidelines from an evaluation report on the activities of OLAF and measures announced by the Commission President in November 2003 to prevent and fight against economic and financial crime. The action plan has a timetable for 2004-2005 for matters it was not possible to deal with in the previous period and actions still to be completed, in particular the strengthening of the operational partnership with the Member States and policy developments related to the Eurostat case and to an EPP.

4.10 The new action plan also has the following guidelines and priorities:

  • reinforcing the 1999 regulatory framework for OLAF's activities and competencies;
  • improving the information flow between Member States and the Commission; and
  • developing the criminal-law protection of financial interests, "for example [by] following up the decision of the Inter-Governmental Conference to establish, in the constitutional treaty, the legal basis for creating a European Prosecutor with competence for protecting the financial interests of the European Union".

The Government's view

4.11 The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Mr Stephen Timms) says:

Annual report 2003

"This report is, as usual, comprehensive and informative. The Government notes that the levels of fraud and irregularity reported in 2003 slowed and decreased in all areas (partly due to the closure of the 1994-99 Structural Fund programming period) with the exception of own resources sector, which reported a small increase of cases, although the amounts against this figure has decreased on 2002.

"The report shows the Commission continues to take seriously the need to improve the financial management of the Communities' funds and taking preventative measures to reduce the amount of fraud and irregularity against the budget. The Government particularly supports the emphasis in this report on shared knowledge and co-operation between the Commission and Member States to combat fraud.

"The 2001-2003 Action Plan shows a great deal of work has been carried out and demonstrates the commitment of the Commission in, particularly, working closely with Member States for the prevention of fraud. The report shows that much has been achieved in the form of new legislation, initiatives and specific ongoing improvements highlighted in the report, all of which have been positive. The Government will continue to support further measures to be taken to fight fraud.

"The Government supports the efforts of OLAF and the cooperation of Member States in the detection of fraud and welcomes many of the measures and proposals in the Report; but remains unconvinced that creating a European Public Prosecutor would be necessary or desirable.

Action Plan for 2004-2005

"The 2004-2005 Action Plan is a continuation of the Commission's ongoing commitment to fight against fraud and its response to new challenges following enlargement. The action plan follows-up several areas of development from the previous action plan; incorporates recent developments; and new initiatives to further improve the Commission, Member States systems and assist applicant countries in their preparations. These are all sensible plans and the Government will monitor progress."

Conclusion

4.12 It is our custom to recommend the Commission's Annual Report on protecting the Communities' financial interests and fighting fraud for debate in European Standing Committee B together with the Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors and other relevant documents. Accordingly we recommend that both of the current documents be debated in European Standing Committee B once we have reported on the 2003 Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors. We expect to have that report before us early in 2005.

4.13 Such a debate will allow Members to consider issues of fraud and other irregularities against the Communities' financial interests and to discuss existing and proposed preventative measures. In the context of proposed preventive measures we note again the Commission's continued persistence in promoting the creation of a European Public Prosecutor, and suggest particular attention be paid to this matter in the debate. We note also the Government's somewhat benign view of progress in improving financial management and reducing irregularities — the debate could examine the basis for this view.





13   See (21444) 10020/00: HC 23-xxvii (1999-2000), para 17 (25 October 2000) and (22438) 9207/01 (22439) 9208/01: HC 152-xii (2001-02), para 2 (16 January 2002). Back

14   The Community budget is financed from own resources, comprising: customs duties, including those on agricultural products; sugar levies; the yield from applying a notional rate of VAT of 1% to an assessment base in each Member State which is "capped" at 0.5% of gross national income (GNI); and a fourth resource based on shares in GNI, the rate of which is determined by what is required (given all other revenue) to balance the budget. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 28 October 2004