Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Letter to the Chairman of the Committee from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, dated 12 January 2004

  Your Committee asked, at my appearance on 11 December, for a note on Gibraltar, Cyprus and the workings of the European Commission between May and November this year. As the Committee Clerks have subsequently written to my officials with additional questions on Cyprus, I suggest that Andrew Mackinlay's question on that topic can be addressed in their reply.

Gibraltar

  The Committee asked about the implications for Gibraltar of the principle of territorial integrity under the draft Constitutional Treaty. Article I.3(3) of the Convention text states that the Union `shall promote economic, social and territorial cohesion, and solidarity among Member States'. Draft Article I.5(1) further states that the Union `shall respect essential [Member] State functions, including those for ensuring the territorial integrity of the State'.

  These provisions were tabled in the Praesidium of the Convention by Michel Barnier of the Commission with support from French and Slovak representatives on the Convention floor. We believe that their primary implication concerns Structural and Cohesion Funds. They place obligations on the Union and not on Member States; they do not confer rights on Spain and cannot reasonably be construed as giving Spain the right to suspend her obligations to Gibraltar.

  The Government of Gibraltar has previously raised concerns on language in the draft Treaty relating to the demarcation of borders. It was tabled at the Convention by Alfonso Dastis, representing the Spanish government.

  Draft Article III.166(3) states that the provisions of Article III.166 on border checks, asylum and immigration `shall not affect the competence of the Member States concerning the geographical demarcation of their borders, in accordance with international law'.

  In legal terms, this provision does not break new ground, merely preserving the competence of each Member State as regards the geographical demarcation of its border in accordance with international law. It ensures that matters concerning the demarcation of borders of Member States are not to be decided by the Union. This simply maintains the present situation and does not confer any rights on Spain which it did not already enjoy under international law.

European Commission

  We discussed briefly the shape of the future Commission during the session. Under the Nice arrangements, which will come into effect in November this year, there will be twenty-five Commissioners. Andrew Mackinlay asked specifically however about the arrangements obtaining before this, but after the accession of new Member States in May. During that time, the existing twenty Commissioners will be joined by another ten from the acceding States. They will be full members of the College of Commissioners, with voting rights, but without specific portfolios. They will work closely with the existing Commissioners.

Rt Hon Jack Straw MP

Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

12 January 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 May 2004