Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by HE Tukhtapulat Riskiev, Ambassador of the Republic of Uzbekistan

1.  Issue raised: According to the Report "Uzbekistan continued to have a poor human rights record, despite numerous verbal and written assurances that it would respect its existing commitments and improve its current situation . . . yet it has consistently fallen short of OSCE commitments on human rights and Article 2 of the EU-Uzbek agreement, which demands for human rights as a basis for trade co-operation" (p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan attaches specific attention to human rights and freedoms. For example, Article 13 of the Constitution states: "Democracy in the Republic of Uzbekistan is based on universal principles according to which a human, his life, freedom, dignity, and other inalienable rights are the uppermost values".

  Uzbekistan has ratified without reservations the six main UN treaties on human rights and presents its reports to conventional bodies of the United Nations on regular basis. So far six reports of Uzbekistan have been considered at UN committees.

  In the Republic of Uzbekistan work to institutionalise the mechanism of protecting human rights is being carried out.

  The Institute of Ombudsman operates within the Parliament of Uzbekistan, the National Center on human rights and the Institute for monitoring of current legislation effectively function. Recently, according to the resolution of the Government of Uzbekistan with a view to increase the efficiency of legal protection of human rights and freedoms, special department on human rights protection was created at the Ministry of Justice.

  Great importance is attached to the laying the foundations of civil society. Currently over 300 national and international NGOs in the sphere of human rights and over 3,000 domestic public organisations have been registered in the republic.

  The Uzbek side would like to draw attention of the FCO to the Report 2002 prepared by the American Embassy in Uzbekistan. In this document the American side acknowledges the progress in human rights record stating that during these two years the situation with human rights have changed in two years and got significantly better in the last twelve months.

  Moreover, it is worth to mention that the Head of the OSCE Centre in Tashkent (CiT) Ambassador Ahmet Erozan in his Report to the Permanent Council of the OSCE pointed out that "the Uzbek Government is a good partner, actively participating in events initiated by CiT and facilitating the coordination among the national institutions for the implementation of the projects. Most encouraging, the Uzbek Government is now coming to CiT with its own project ideas. Issues like money laundering, trafficking of human beings and torture became themes open to discussion. The Uzbek Government assisted the Centre for the extension of its premises and accords to the CiT a preferential treatment".

  In addition, CiT "sees the registration of legitimate opposition political parties and the introduction of convertibility as important steps underlining the willingness of the Uzbek authorities for genuine changes".

  The Uzbek side along with the OSCE and other international organizations carries out a wide range of activities not only in political, economic and environmental but also in human dimensions.

  "CiT continued its efforts on developing the capacity of women to play a more significant role in various aspects of public life. The first phase of "Human Rights Monitoring and Reporting for Young Women" program was organised by CiT on 5-9 June. The program was mainly focused on educating young women on human rights, gender equality and domestic violence.

  The activities in the rule of law field were focused on implementation of the prison reform program in close co-operation with the Interior Ministry of Uzbekistan. The Prison Administration has shown a great interest in our co-operation and the OSCE has now a very good access to places of detention in Uzbekistan. Together with Uzbek authorities, the local NGO "Center of Social Adaptation of Women" and Penal Reform International in Central Asia, three regional seminars were conducted in August for prison directors covering international standards on prison conditions and treatment of prisoners. The newly launched prison reform programme gave to the Centre an additional opportunity to visit several prison facilities".

  Political and democratic reforms in Uzbekistan should be assessed not from a viewpoint of high achievements of the West but on the basis of dynamics and concrete results on the way to international criteria and standards.

2.   Issue raised: ". . . there to be approximately 7,000 political and religious prisoners in places of detention in Uzbekistan". (p.29) "We believe there to be between seven and 10,000 people in detention whom we would consider as political and/or religious prisoners". (p.254, Speech by UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan at the Freedom House reception in Tashkent, October 17, 2002)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: The Uzbek side would like to remind once again that the legislation of Uzbekistan does not allow to prosecute any one for his/her political and/or religious beliefs. As a sovereign state acting in accordance with the Constitution, Uzbekistan undertakes certain preventive measures only against some representatives of extremist organisations that openly call upon to overthrow constitutional order by violence, and those responsible for terrorist acts.

  Annual amnesties gives the opportunity to tens of thousand of citizens to return to normal life.

  It should be underscored that since 1997 six decrees of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On amnesty" were adopted that led to more than 198,000 persons to be released from places of detention.

  In accordance with a Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On discharge from criminal liability of the citizens of Uzbekistan who by fallacy found themselves in terrorist groups" dated 6 November 2000, 213 persons, who voluntarily admitted their guilt, were discharged of criminal liability.

  In accordance with a Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On amnesty on occasion of celebrating the 10th Anniversary of Independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan" dated 22 August 2001, 941 members of religious-extremist organizations were freed on parole.

  In accordance with the Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On amnesty on occasion of celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the Constitution Day of the Republic of Uzbekistan" dated 3 December 2002, 923 members of religious-extremist organisations were freed from completing punishment.

  In the last three years (excluding 2003) more than 2,000 imprisoned members of religious-extremist organisations were amnested by Decrees of the President of Uzbekistan.

  Nowadays the members of religious-extremist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir attempt to present themselves as victims of their convictions. Their real purpose is to establish medieval caliphate regime in a vast region. This organisation in every way creates the image of enemy in face of United States and the West, kindles anti-Semitism and racial enmity, does not recognise any regime in the world as legitimate and calls the constitution of secular countries as a "code of devil".

  Some members of Hizb ut-Tahrir are convicted not for their beliefs, but for their appeal to overthrow the legitimately elected authority, kindling interreligious and interethnic hostility, which is extremely dangerous in the multinational and multiconfessional state.

  Activity of Hizb ut-Tahrir is banned and persecuted by authorities of almost all Muslim and some European countries including Germany.

  The Republic of Uzbekistan regrets that activities of this international extremist organisation is openly coordinated from its head-quarters in London. In this regard Uzbekistan appeals to the British Government to consider the issue of closure of this non-tolerance and extremist centre.

  For Uzbekistan to ensure rights and freedoms of its citizens is a main priority of its internal policy. In this regard, our country is open for dialogue with all interested parties to discuss and resolve all set of issues. The Government of Uzbekistan chose the way of democratic reforms in the society not for the sake of political situation or satisfaction of "external requests" but for achieving of sustainable development of Uzbek society, its prosperity and well-being.

  Moreover, some significant changes have been done in criminal legislation since 2000. Arrest and detention are excluded as a punishment for many types of crimes. It allowed to decrease the number of detainees in two times in comparison with 2000 and other CIS countries.

  In 2002 there were 191 detained per 100,000 people listed in the country, then the same period in the Russian Federation has seen a number of 628, in Belarus—554, in Kazakhstan—522, Turkmenistan—489, Ukraine—406, as well as in Latvia—359.

3.  Issue raised: "In the Uzbek criminal justice system the conviction rate is almost 100%. It is difficult not to conclude that once accused by the Prokurator there is no effective possibility of fair trial in the sense we understand it". (p.254, Speech by UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan at the Freedom House reception in Tashkent, October 17, 2002)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: Since 2001 the Government of Uzbekistan is pursuing widespread betterment of its court-judicial system.

  Arrest and detention are excluded as a punishment for many types of crimes. It allowed to decrease the number of detainees in two times in comparison with 2000.

  "The Law on Courts" in its new edition became the basis for amending criminal procedural legislation, improving procedural court hearing procedures, introduction of the appellate institution, reforming appeal court system. Consideration of cases under appellate procedures made it possible for timely and effective correction of court mistakes and to re-establish justice on submissions of convicts, victims, their lawyers or lawful representatives.

  "Law on changes and amendments to the Criminal, Criminal Procedural Codes and Code on administrative liability in connection with liberalization of criminal punishment" adopted in August 2001 made substantial changes to the system of criminal law and court practice.

  First, Criteria for classifying criminal acts have been changed. In the past, criminal acts of lesser public danger considered to be those for which criminal punishment was set in the forms other than imprisonment. According to the new legislature, criminal acts of lesser public danger are now classified as those for which punishment is imprisonment for less than three years, crimes committed incautiously for which punishment is imprisonment for less than five years.

  This law dramatically changed investigative and courts practice on selecting measure of prosecution and setting punishment. Thus, options for releasing the accused from prosecution and punishment in cases of first offense of lesser public danger or less heinous crimes have been expanded.

  The analysis of the court practice reveals that changing criteria for classifying criminal acts and liberalisation of criminal punishment made a positive effect on social-judicial situation in the country. Thus, if during last several years (1998-2001) there has been an increase in number of convictions, then after entering into force of the given law the number of convictions substantially diminished. For instance, in 2002 the total number of convictions went down to 13.8% in comparison with the year 2001.

  Substantial changes are also observed in court practice for setting punishments. For example, if in 1998 the share of convicted in the form of imprisonment was 49.2% of total convicted, in 1999—48.4%, in 2000—47. 2%, in the first half of 2003 this figure was 34.7%, and 65.3% of convictions were in the form other than imprisonment. This means that many convicts are not being isolated from their families and society.

  Second, this law softened the punishment on 87 crimes envisaged in the Criminal Code, including in 26 cases imprisonment was totally excluded as a measure of punishment and in several cases imprisonment was replaced by fines. Thus, this law made it possible to enforce punishment in the form of a fine in 187 crimes. As a result, if in 2000 the fining as a measure of punishment has been applied in 2.1% of convictions, then during the first half of 2003 this figure rose to 12.8%.

  Third, the possibility for the courts not to imprison for certain types of crimes of economic character, in cases where economic losses are covered by the accused, made it possible to widely apply other forms of criminal punishment rather than imprisonment (such as fines, public works).

  Since the new law came on the scene, more than 5,000 convicts had a choice to repent outside penitentiary establishments since the economic losses of the victims were covered by them.

  Fourth, the deliverance of additional punishment as a confiscation of property from a number of articles of the Criminal Code on 142 types of crimes prevented the unjust punishment, inherited from the Soviet past. Hence, it has put to an end the needless sufferings on the part of the family, children and neighbors of those, who are said to have committed the crime. 4.871 people were released of such punishment.

  Fifth, article 50 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan has acquired a new point, which has secured no more than three quarters of the highest term of imprisonment for the convicted men over 60 years of age and women, envisioned by the article of the Particular part of the given code. Thus, the terms of imprisonment have been cut with regard to 279 persons convicted before, hence, allowing for most of them to return to their families.

  Over the last years, enormous attention is being paid to reeducation of minor criminals without isolating them from society. If in 1998 56.5% of total number of convicted minors were imprisoned, then in 1999 this number made up 42.5%, in 2000—32.4%, as well as in the first half of 2003—23.6%.

  Sixth, the Chapter, namely "Processes on reconciliation" has been added into the Criminal-Legal Code, which envisages the release of legal responsibility due to the reconciliation. This is an absolutely new institution in the legal science as well as legislature.

  Since 2001, due to the reconciliation pact with plaintiff 13,520 defendants were released of legal liability.

  Seventh, the amendments introduced into a number of articles of the Criminal Code envisage the cutting of terms with probation release of punishment, and alternating it with softer punishment. In its turn, such move serves as an encouraging step with regard to the imprisoned and promotes the fastest return of them to the right track.

  Henceforth, the new edition of articles 73 and 74 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan expanded the application of probation terms with regard to convicted to imprisonment, or alternating the punishment with a softer one. The given norm has been applied to 10,000 convicted persons.

  At the same time, the cutting of terms of being under arrest and preliminary investigation of crimes, as well as limiting the terms of hearing the cases in the court of law prevented the cases of red tape at the stage of preliminary investigation and court hearings. Also, these procedures raised the level of responsibility among investigators and judges, allowed the on-time solution of criminal cases, as well as prevented the cases of groundless and long detentions.

  According to data, in 2001 the number of cases investigated within a timeframe of more than three months made up 939, and in 2003 the following figure went down to 69 criminal cases, particularly, those considered to be grave and heinous crimes.

  On September 26, 2003 the President of Uzbekistan has signed Decree "On liberalization of prison conditions of first-time convicts". According to this Decree the persons imprisoned for non-serious crimes will serve the sentence in the special settlements that provide them the possibility for normal contacts with families.

  Moreover, due to mistakes by prosecutors and investigators in choosing of the type of punishment, 3,744 persons detained during preliminary investigations were released from custody and other type of punishment with no imprisonment was applied to them.

  Over the space of 2002 and the current year, based on the protest by prosecutors, the groundless court sentences envisaging the severe penalties have been amended, and measures of punishments with regard to 3,371 persons—mitigated.

  Over the one and a half years, based on the principle of equality of all before the law, a number of disciplinary punishments were imposed on 74 judges who had come at groundless decisions while considering the criminal cases. Five judges were charged with bribery for application of the softer punishment, envisaged in the law.

  Closer attention is paid to the issues of human rights of detainees and prisoners. Additional measures were undertaken for fair resolution of appeals by detainees and prisoners, and almost half of 1,600 complains were resolved by Prosecutor's Office. Direct communication and personal talks of prosecutors with prisoners now proves to be effective, which leads to measures against illegal acts committed by officials. For example, over the last one and a half year, 3,433 acts by prosecutors eliminated the infringements of law.

    4.  Issue raised: "Opposition parties are banned are banned. The right of opposition figures, human rights activists and journalists to express freely their opinions is severely curtailed by the authorities". (p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: The registration of political parties is carried out in accordance with the Law on Political Parties (with amendments and additions) dated December 26 1996. In accordance with this Law, the registration procedure of political parties by the Ministry of Justice shall last not longer than a month starting from the submission date of application. According to the Article 5 of this Law the state guarantees the protection of rights and legal interests of political parties, and creates equal opportunities for them to fulfill their aims and tasks mentioned in their charters.

  Article 9 includes exhaustive list of reasons of rejection to register political parties. In addition, in case of rejection the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall inform the leadership of the party about it with the reference to submitted documents contradicting the provisions of state legislation. The rejection may be appealed in the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Uzbekistan.

  Nowadays, there are five registered political parties in Uzbekistan (People Democratic Party of Uzbekistan, "Fidokorlaar", "Milliy Tiklanish", "Adolat", Movement of entrepreneurs and businessmen—liberal Democratic Party of Uzbekistan).

  Currently over 300 national and international NGOs in the sphere of human rights and over 3,000 domestic public organizations have been registered in the Republic.

  There are 900 (351 in 1991, 784 in 2001) media services in Uzbekistan including 560 newspapers, 165 magazines, 4 information agencies, 70 radio and TV stations, and more than 100 electronic information providers.

  The press is published in Uzbek, Russian, English, Kazakh, Tajik, Bukhara-Jewish and Korean languages.

  About 30 private TV stations are working in the country. Moreover, there are 10 private FM radio stations broadcasting on Uzbek, Russian and English.

  Internet is becoming more accessible for the population. Today there are more than 354,000 of Internet users in Uzbekistan. In 2001 the users accounted for 137,000. It is worth to mention that there are no restrictions on the use of the Internet in Uzbekistan.

  In addition there are 44 accredited representatives of foreign media in the Republic.

  The laws passed in 2002-2003 envision a transition to a bicameral parliament and electing the candidates nominated just by political parties and movements will boost a public political activity, the role of political parties, non-governmental and civil institutions, as well as true implementation of the principle "From the strong state onto a strong civil society".

    5.  Issue raised: "The UK appreciates the real security threats that Uzbekistan faces from terrorism and drugs trafficking. However, we have consistently urged Uzbekistan not to exploit the international fight against terrorism. . .Uzbekistan should not use it as an excuse for the persecution of those who pursue their views by peaceful means". (p.29, p.254, Speech by UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan at the Freedom House reception in Tashkent, October 17, 2002)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: In this regard the Uzbek side would like to draw the attention of the British government on the following: being participating in the international antiterrorist coalition, Uzbekistan not only assists to combat international terrorism and to strengthen regional security but also upholds generally accepted values of freedom and democracy, that have become "targets" of international terrorism and religious extremism.

    6.  Issue raised: "Torture is a serious problem in Uzbekistan, and we lobbied on numerous cases at senior levels. The cases of Muzafar Avazov and Husnidin Alimov, two members of banned Islamist party Hizb ut-Tahrir who were apparently tortured to death in Jaslyk Prison with boiling water, rightly attracted significant attention. . ."(p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: In August 6, 2002 approximately at 15.50 in the cell of brigade #15 UY-64/71 located in Jaslyk, the Republic of Karakalpakstan, there was a disputed incident between convicted persons of the following character.

  As of August 6, 2002 there were the following convicted in the brigade #15 UY-64/71 contained: AVEZOV Muzaffar Mirzaahmedovich, ALIMOV Husniddin Sirojiddinovich, RUZIEV Yoldosh Ismailovich, ABDULLAEV Anvar Allayarovich, BOBOEV Kamol Hasanovich, HASANOV Uktam Sadullaevich.

  In August 6, 2002 approximately at 15.50 between convicted Alimov, Avezov on the one part and Abdullaev, Ruziev on the other part there was a disputed incident on ground of mutual hostility. In a course of suddenly arisen quarrel both sides had inflicted each other various body injuries by hand strikes, improvised subjects and boiled water which were in the cell for household purposes.

  The incident between four convicted at the presence of two convicted-eyewitnesses proceeded no more than three minutes, thus there was not a much noise of it. As Avezov got burns, convicted Hasanov called officers of the establishment, who called for the medical servicemen. The chief of the establishment's medical service and his assistant had rendered urgent medical aid for the victims. In view of their heavy burns, Avezov and Alimov were transferred to the aid station where intensive therapy was carried out.

  Physical condition of Avezov was as following: pallor of integuments, in areas of thermal burn (both hands from brushes on elbows, from area of a stomach up to a knee joint)—reddening with bubbles and tearing away of integument, a burn of 26-27 %, temperature of 38,8oC, blood pressure lowered—60/40, pulse—60 b/m, complaints to pains in an areas of burn and heart. From the moment of detention in the establishment Avezov was registered and clinically observed with the diagnosis: cardiac ischemia, hypertension illness of 2-3rd degrees, adiposity of 2nd degrees, varicose veins of the bottom extremities. He repeatedly was on treatment earlier, there were complaints to pains in heart and headache, and the general physical condition was "relatively satisfactory".

  Physical condition of Alimov was as following: pallor of integuments, in a areas of thermal burn (the left part of breast area and the left area of scapula)—reddening with bubbles and tearing away of integument, a burn of 17-19%, high temperature, lowered blood pressure and pulse, the pressed graze in the size about 2sm on the face between eyebrows with partial damage of integument, complaints to pain in areas of burn, headache, pain in lumbar area, and later—strangury. From the moment of detention in the establishment Alimov was registered and clinically observed with the diagnosis: Acute nephritic deficiency, cardiovascular deficiency, rheumatic polyarthritis, chronic polynephritis, rheumatism, latent maxillary-brain injury. He repeatedly was under treatment. Complaints to pains in heart and kidneys, the general physical condition was "relatively satisfactory".

  About 17.30, taking into account the condition of patients, the chief of the medical service had addressed to the head of establishment with the petition for necessity of patients' transportation for rendering the qualified treatment in SI-9 (located in Nukus city). In view of that transportation in the evening time is prohibited, the patients were transported by special vehicle about 8.30 am in August 7, 2002 with support of the chief-doctor. Taking into consideration that the road up to SI-9 makes 380 km, 200km of which through the steppe, and the temperature that day was high, special vehicle had highly heated up. Besides it, in view of tyres' damage along the road because of high temperature, the transportation took in total more than six hours. Thus the condition of patients along the way had considerably worsened. And it was not possible to rescue Avezov and Alimov by the provided medical aid, as soon as they were delivered in SI-9.

  As a result of heavy physical injuries during the conflict between cell-mates, burdened by heavy conditions of transportation, chronic cardiac diseases of both (Alimov—also kidneys) in August 7, 2002 at 16.20 the death of Alimov with the indication of the reason of death ("acute cardiovascular deficiency, nephritic deficiency"), and in August 7, 2002 at 17.40 the death of Avezov with the indication of the reason of death ("acute cardiovascular deficiency") were ascertained.

  The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Karakalpakstan carried out administrative investigation on the fact of death of convicted Alimov H. and Avezov M. According to the investigational findings, in August 18, 2002 Minister of Internal Affairs of Karakalpakstan affirmed the report on the basis of which 10 employees of establishment, including the head of settlement, were punished in the disciplinary order, two of them were discharged. The Office of Public Prosecutor of the Republic Karakalpakstan initiated a criminal case against sergeant Mansurov, controller of military unit # 7553, who was in duty of the chief of detachment.

  In August 9, 2002 the Office of Public Prosecutor of Republic Karakalpakstan initiated a criminal case # 50715 on the basis of Article 105/1 of the Criminal Code of the Republics of Uzbekistan (deliberate body injury of medium degree) against convicted Abdullaev A. and Ruziev Y. on the fact of making physical injuries to Alimov H. and Avezov M.

  After proper investigation, the case was delivered to the court. As a result of trial, in February 9, 2003, Court of the Mujnak district of the Republic Karakalpakstan made a verdict. According to verdict for beating and scalding with boiled water—Abdullaev A. was convicted to punishment by Articles 105/2 and 60 of the CC of Uzbekistan for three years of six months of the imprisonment, Ruziev I. Was convicted by Articles 105/2 and 60 of the CC of Uzbekistan for 13 years of imprisonment.

  Besides, it is necessary to note, that after the fact described above, the administration of the Jaslyk settlement undertook all measures, in case of critical situations demanding surgical intervention. It was decided to transport convicted patients to Nukus by the plane of sanitary aviation. There were 8 convicted patients were transported to Nukus by the plane of sanitary aviation during 2003.

    7.  Issue raised: "The work of the ICRC is suspended `due to difficulties securing the co-operation of prison officials'". (p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: In 2001 the government of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded the agreement on humanitarian activity with regard to the detained and imprisoned.

  Based on the Agreement, in 2001 the group of the ICRC representatives paid four visits to detention places (including the penitentiary facility "Jaslyk"—two visits), in 2002—five visits, as well as during 2003—more than 30 visits.

  For over the past three years the ICRC delegates visited 12 colonies, 12 detention places and seven jails out of total 21 colonies (with common, strict, and special regimes).

  In May this year the group of delegates from the Co-operation commission "Uzbekistan-EU" visited facility UY 64/1 (Zangiota district of Tashkent province).

  The representatives of the EU member-country embassies (such as Italy, Germany, Netherlands, France and Great Britain) paid a visit to facility UY 64/18 (the city of Tashkent) and facility UY 64/71 (the settlement of Jaslyk). They have confidentially conversed with prisoners, serving their sentences for the crimes against Constitutional order and public safety (such as Begjanov M., Khudaiberdiev I., Rakhmonov A., and others).

  In October this year another visit took place to facility UY 64/71 (in Jaslyk) with participation of the Ambassadors of Italy (A. Persiani) and Germany (M. Hecker), the UK Embassy Charge d'Affairs (A. Noble), counselor of the Netherlands Embassy (T. A. Kouvenaar), attache of the Embassy of France (J. Gali) and Germany (R. Richter).

  Given the realization of the OSCE Center project in Tashkent on the study programs among the personnel, the regional international seminars were held in August this year for the personnel of the penitentiary system in Tashkent, Navoi, and Karshi. Along preparation and holding these seminars, the representatives of the OSCE Center in Tashkent and ODIHR/OSCE experts visited six facilities of the penitentiary system—these are UY 64/1 and UY64/ZMC (Zangiota district of Tashkent province), UY 64/IZ [en rule]7 (town of Kattakurgan), UY 64/46 (city of Navoi), UY 64/51 (town of Koson), and UY 64/33 (city of Karshi).

  Within the framework of study of the Concept on the fight against tuberculosis in penitentiary facilities, the WHO and KFW-Bank resident offices in Tashkent are said to have employed bank's delivery experts. With such an aim the WHO regional representative in Central Asia and other foreign representatives visited the facility UY 64/18 (Tashkent city) three times vis-a-vis evaluating its readiness for launching the project.

  In 2003 the Konrad Adenauer Foundation jointly with the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Authorized of the Oliy Majlis for Human Rights (Ombudsman) and National Center of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights held two international seminars at the facilities UY 64/46 (Navoi city), and UY 64/3VK (Zangiota district of Tashkent province).

  During regional seminars on human rights the representatives of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation visited facilities such as UY 64/71 (Jaslyk settlement), UY 64/73 (Zafarobod district of Jizzakh province), UY 64/3 (Bustonlik district of Tashkent province). The visit to facility UY 64/IZ-8 (Termez city) is expected to take place during the regional seminar to be held in Surkhandarya province in December 2003.

  During this year correspondents and journalists of international agencies accredited in Uzbekistan such as France Press, Associated Press, BBC, Reuters, Liberation and others visited correction facilities (UY 64/18, Tashkent city, UY 64/7, Tashkent city, UY 64/71 Jaslyk settlement, 64/3 Bustonlik district of Tashkent province and others).

  Within the framework of implementing the pilot project on prevention of HIV/AIDS among the sentenced drug addicts, the representatives of the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation (Soros Foundation) visited the facility UY 64/6 (town of Chirchik), while the representatives of Counterpart visited the facility UY 64/7 (Tashkent city) within the framework of training project for sentenced women (computer literacy, knitting, haircutting, and sewing skills).

  Upon the special request of the US Embassy, its representatives visited facilities UY 64/46 (Navoi city), UY 64/33 (Karshi city), UY 64/7 (Tashkent city), UY 64/TVK (Tashkent city).

  As a part of preparation and holding the Co-ordination Council meetings on the prison health care, the employees of the London-based international non-governmental organization headquarters, namely "International prison reform", and its regional offices in Almaty (Baroness Vivienne Stern, Eleanor Lou, Vera Tkachenko, Gulnara Kaliakbarova, and others) visited the UY 64/1 (based in Zangiota District of Tashkent Province), and others.

  Thus, according to the aforementioned facts, there are unhampered visits in Uzbekistan by the ICRC and foreign country embassy representatives to all detention places.

    8.  Issue raised: "In December 2002 the EU protested against the death sentence handed to Iskander Khudaiberganov, despite strong allegations that torture was applied to secure his and others' confessions. The allegations were dismissed without further investigation". (p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: According to the information provided by the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Tashkent City Court, criminal proceedings against I.Khudoibergenov were instituted on the charges of committing a series of terrorist acts in Tashkent on February 16, 1999. Immediately after the terrorist attacks, Khudoibergenov and his accomplices (148 people in total) went into hiding and were declared at large.

  On January 31, 2002 Khudoibergenov was arrested by the law-enforcement agencies of Tajikistan, and on February 5, 2002 handed over to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

  The subsequent investigation has determined that in February, 1998 Khudoibergenov joined the so-called "Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan" (IMU), extremist religious organization created by T.Yuldashev and J.Namangoniy.

  From February through August, 1998 he was trained in military terrorist camps in Chechnya under the direct supervision of Khattab, notorious international terrorist. The investigation further revealed that nearly 35 citizens of Uzbekistan took terrorist training in two Chechen camps at Serjantyurt and Shali from spring, 1998, through January, 1999.

  Having returned to Uzbekistan in the Autumn of 1998 Khudoibergenov, in fact, established a Tashkent branch of the IMU with other members of the criminal group O.V.Kadirov, A.B.Abdullaev, B.T.Kasimbekov, N.A.Khakimov, A.Kh.Sharifov, A.Akhmedov, etc. The group was aiming at the forceful overthrowing the constitutional order by declaring "Jihad" and creating an Islamic state, destabilizing social and political situation in Uzbekistan. Pursuing the goal of getting hold of necessary means for its activities, the criminal group led by Khudoibergenov committed a series of grave crimes, including murders and robberies.

  On the eve of terrorist attacks of February 16, 1999, the accomplices telephoned Khudoibergenov and warned him to hide and await further instructions.

  On March 4, 1999, having armed themselves with a sawn-off rifle and other weapons, Khudoibergenov and others robbed the entrepreneur K.Obidov's house, located in the Trade Center of Tashkent region, and stole large sum of local and foreign currency along with the victim's personal vehicle "Nexia".

  On August 6, 1999, having committed robbery assault on local entrepreneur K.Jalolov, Khudoibergenov and others caused him severe bodily injuries that subsequently led to his death. While trying to escape the crime scene, they murdered B.Rizaev and O.Mukhamedov, Patrol Police officers of the Tashkent City Department of Internal Affairs.

  In August, 1999 Khudoibergenov fled to Tajikistan, where he ended up in a Tavildara Gorge military terrorist camp established by J.Namangomiy. From August through November he participated in the incursions of the IMU militants into Batken region of Kyrgystan.

  In June, 2000 Khudoibergenov took special training course on explosive operations at an IMU camp in Tajikistan under the supervision of a Pakistani instructor. By J.Namangoniy's personal instruction, I.Khudoibergenov arrived in Tashkent in July, 2000 to set up explosives at a railroad station or other large facilities. These carefully planned terrorist attacks failed due to the arrest by law enforcement officials of Uzbekistan of a group of his accomplices, who were attempting to break into Bostanlik region of Uzbekistan from Tajikistan with the explosive's detonator and match.

  From September, 2000 through July, 2001 Khudoibergenov was hiding himself in his relative's house in Tashkent. While searching the B.Karimov's house, where Khudoibergenov once lived temporarily, the investigators found 4 kg. of niter and 0.6 kg of aluminium powder for a self-made explosive device.

  Based on their own confession, corroboration at crime scenes, testimonies of the victims, confrontation protocols, forensic evidence, ballistic and chemical examination of the sawn-off rifle and 79 5.6-calibre cartridges found during the search, Khudoibergenov and the criminal group's other members were proven guilty of committing the aforementioned crimes.

  The investigation on the group has not been closed and the rest of its members, including A.Bekmirzaev, are still at large.

  In accordance with the law and appeals of the UN Human Rights Committee under its Rule 86, execution of sentence for I. Khudoyberganov has been suspended until the Clemency Commission under the President's Office of Uzbekistan and the Human Rights Committee will consider it.

    9.  Issue raised: "The death in custody of Orif Ershanov on 15 May 2003, who was detained on suspicion of belonging to Hizb ut-Tahrir, was condemned by the international community. Despite EU requests for an independent investigation into the death, the Uzbek authorities declined any offers of assistance". (p.29)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: Penitentiary institutions are visited on a regular basis by the representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross, as well as of other international organizations and embassies of foreign countries in Tashkent. The condemned persons treatment conditions in these establishments have been substantially improved.

  Each case of death of the imprisoned person in these establishments is being carefully investigated with obligatory procedure of judicial medical examination for the death-causing reason clarification, and the decision made on the grounds of this investigation is strictly based on letter of law.

  We have following information regarding death of O.Eshonov.

  On May 6, 2003 O.Eshonov was detained as a suspected in committing a crime stipulated by an article 159, part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (an encroachment on the existing constitutional system) and from May 9, 2003 was held in custody.

  On May 10, 11 and 13, 2003, being at the temporary isolator of Karshi-city internal affairs unit, Eshonov had harsh rise of the blood pressure and for this reason he was hospitalized to the Kashkadarya region branch of the Republican science center of first aid.

  On the basis of medical inspection his diagnosis was formulated as following: "Hypertensive illness of 2nd level, hypertensive crisis of 1st level, heavy form of pulmonary asthmas, chronic kidney insufficiency, anemia of heavy level, chronic bronchitis and pneumonia."

  Despite of all undertaken medical treatment measures, O.Eshonov died in the named medical institution on May 15, 2003.

  The Office of Prosecutor of Karshi prescribed to carry out a judicial-medical examination of the death of O.Eshonov, which concluded, that his death was caused by hypertensive illness, infringement of brain blood circulation and a hemorrhage in a brain, physical injury indications were not revealed.

  Conclusions of death-cause examination were confirmed by doctors, who had treated Eshonov and other collected documents, and in this regard the Karshi-city Prosecutor Office on May, 31, 2003 refused in excitation of criminal investigation on the fact of Eshonov's death. This decision on June, 11, 2003 was cancelled by Kashkadarya region Prosecutor Office and presently O.Eshonov's death fact is being investigated.

    10.  Issue raised: "The journalist and human rights activist Ruslan Sharipov was arrested on 26 May 2003 in Tashkent on suspicion of having committed homosexual acts . . . we believe that the accusations may be politically motivated as well as being intrinsically unjust and are linked to Sharipov's criticisms of the Uzbek government and revelations about police corruption". (p.30)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: Ruslan Alexandrovich Shripov, born in 1978, a citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan, on August 13, 2003 was condemned by Mirzo-Ulugbek district court for on criminal cases of Tashkent under the charges of articles of Criminal Code of Uzbekistan 120 (sodomy), 127 part 3 para b (involving in criminal activities of two and more minors), 128 part 2a (repeated sexual intercourse with the person under 16 years) and was sentenced for five years and six months of imprisonment.

  During investigation and litigation on R.Sharipov's case it is revealed, that in night of May 22 and 23 2003, involving minors Otabek Ortykov, born on 22.06.1987, and Otabek Tahirzhonov, born on 19.07.1987, into sexual relations for compensation, he committed with them acts of sodomy (satisfaction of sexual needs in unnatural form without violence).

  In night of May 26 2003 he committed the same actions with minors O.Ortykov and A.Muminkulov.

  On the basis of petition of victims' parents (O.Ortykov and O.Tahirzhonov), R.Sharipov was detained. Detention procedure and preliminary investigation were carried out in accordance with criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Law enforcement structures representatives had not used any physical force application, psychological pressure or other unlawful methods. It was confirmed by the results of special inspection of R.Sharipov carried our two days after his detention, ie on May 29 2003.

  At detention, during investigation, and hearing the case R.Sharipov completely admitted his own guilt.

  The closeness of litigation on R.Sharipov's case is explained by the ethical reasons, because minors participated in the process as victims. Besides upon request of R.Sharipov himself, who did not want disclosure of criminal case details, his relatives were not admitted to the judicial session.

  R.Sharipov's interests during the investigation and litigation were defended by two independent lawyers.

  The court, having studied materials of the case, having listened to the victims, witnesses, the defendant, as well as statements of prosecution and defense, has found R.Sharipov guilty and has sentenced him for punishment as imprisonment for five years and six months.

  On September 25, 2003 the Tashkent city court on the basis of R.Sharipov's appeal examined his case anew and made a decision to reduce the term of punishment from five years and six months to four years of imprisonment.

  Presently condemned R.Sharipov provided with conditions and treatment of imprisonment in full accordance with requirements stipulated in international legal documents. Conditions of treatment of R.Sharipov are satisfactory, his physical and intellectual condition is under protection of the Law.

  The Uzbek side again declares, that R.Sharipov is condemned to imprisonment not for his professional activities and not for his non-conventional sexual orientation, but for paedophilia, which is considered to be a serious crime in many countries.

    11.  Issue raised: "It is not only Muslims who suffer and being prosecuted for pursuing his/her beliefs" in Uzbekistan. (p.255, Speech by UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan at the Freedom House reception in Tashkent, October 17, 2002)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: Representatives of various religions live in Uzbekistan and all the citizens are free to profess their religious beliefs. It is guaranteed by the Constitution and country's laws.

  The adoption of the Law on "Freedom of conscience and religious organizations" in 1991 and its new edition in 1998 resulted in qualitative change of role and legal status of religious organizations. The aim of this Law is to secure and guarantee the freedoms and rights of consciousness and belief for every one, to maintain equality of citizens regardless to their religious beliefs, and to regulate issues related to the activities of religious organizations.

  It is worth to mention that in 1990 only 211 religious organizations were registered in Uzbekistan. Currently, 2096 religious organizations are registered in Uzbekistan, 1918 of them—Islamic, 160—Christian, seven—Jewish, seven-Bakhai communities, two—Krishna consciousness communities and one Buddhist temple. All believers and religious organizations are free to set up and maintain international links and direct private contacts including trips abroad for pilgrimage, participating in seminars and conferences.

  Since Independence about 40,000 citizens of Uzbekistan have performed pilgrimage to Mecca (big Haj) and 20,000—to small Haj (Umrah). It should be mentioned, that during the whole period of Soviet rule the number of pilgrims from Uzbekistan was only 86 men. Over this period the number of mosques has increased from 89 to more than 2,000.

  There are Islamic University, Higher Clerical Institute, 10 Islamic madrasahs and two seminaries in Uzbekistan, where representatives of new generations pursue their education.

  Moreover, on 22 August 2003 the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan issued a Decree No 364 on rendering of social assistance and privileges for further improvement of spiritual and educational work in religious sphere and realization of action plan on protection of the people, especially the youth from the threat of religious terrorism.

    12.  Issue raised: "In August the government embarked upon a series of closures of major bazaars in Tashkent, and subsequently across Uzbekistan. It directly affected the livelihood of an estimated 50,000 people . . . the IMF have recommended that thes issues be reversed". (p.255, Speech by UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan at the Freedom House reception in Tashkent, October 17, 2002)

  Measures undertaken by Uzbekistan: In 18-27 June 2003 an International Monetary Fund delegation visited Uzbekistan the country's recent economic performance and progress in market economy, and to discuss conditions for resuming financial co-operation. The delegation acknowledged a significant progress made in 2002 and the first quarter of this year.

  The IMF's mission considered the implementation of the budget, lowering of the inflation rate, and the considerable reduction of the difference between the exchange rates as a success.

  According to the Mission's assessment, positive results have been achieved in implementing structural reforms. In particular, they have noted measures taken on increasing the role of the private sector, improving market relations in agriculture, reforming the construction sector, improving healthcare system.

  As a result of the visit of the IMF delegation in June 2003, in order to liberalize foreign economic activity and expand the role of the private sector, the Government and Central Bank expressed to the IMF their intention to abolish all current restrictions on currency exchange and the application of multiple exchange rates by the end of this year.

  In this regard, the Government, in consultation with IMF, developed an Action Plan which foresees current account convertibility by the end of 2003. On 15 October 2003 Uzbekistan joined the Article 8 of the IMF and the convertibility of the national currency on current account transactions was provided. During the second half of the year we managed to equalize exchange rates.

  According to the Report to the Permanent Council of the OSCE by the Head of the OSCE Centre in Tashkent (CiT) Ambassador Ahmet Erozan "the Uzbek Government has recently taken a number of steps to stimulate the activity of private enterprises, simplifying the tax structure, limiting the number of inspections by authorities, and reducing procedures for SME registration".

  At the current stage of reforms we are implementing a Comprehensive Program on the liberalization of the currency regulation system and the financial sector's foreign economic activities, acceleration of the development of small and medium enterprises, strengthening private sector.

  Reforms of governmental agencies are also under way. We have significantly reduced the Government's and regulating agencies' interference into economic activities of enterprises. For instance, the number of illegal audits went down dramatically: in 2002 there were 157 cases of illegal audits of enterprises set against 1,450 cases in 2001.

  The establishment of the Department of legal protection of foreign investments within the Ministry of Justice in May, 2003 has provided an effective mechanism for the legal protection of foreign investors' rights and interests.

  In short period since the Department's establishment, there have been five cases when the decisions of regulating agencies, that have violated the rights of foreign investors, were called off.

  For example: The 83 million som fine against "UzBAT" Uzbek-Britain joint venture was abolished.

  We are now witnessing positive developments in reforming our banking system and commercial banks.

  Our gold and hard currency reserves have expanded significantly. This year alone gross capital of commercial banks has grown by 32%. Improvements in credit repayment have led to a 36% increase of commercial bank loans.

  The general public's trust to the banking system is getting stronger: deposits to private accounts have grown by 44%.

  We are liberalizing and bringing our legislation on foreign economic activities into accordance with international standards: import customs duties have been unified, import contract registration procedures have been simplified, system of certification of imported goods as well as the norms and standards of the World Customs Organization have been introduced.

  Based on the world market prices, we have introduced a more advanced and modern system of pricing for major agricultural commodities—raw cotton, cotton fiber, and grain.

  We have taken measures to reduce tax burden on enterprises and to unify taxation system. As you know, in 2003 profit tax rate was reduced from 24% to 20%, deductions into social insurance funds for juridical persons went down from 37,3% to 35%, while some types of taxes have been abolished.

  These measures have contributed significantly to the improvement of financial status of manufactures and enterprises and extended their investment activity. For the first half of 2003, private investment has increased by 18% and reached 46% out of the total amount of investment into the economy.

  The key issue of reforms at the current stage is to deepen the processes of privatization and to create on its basis a widespread network of private enterprises. It is necessary to acknowledge that these processes are going more dynamically this year.

  On August 26, 2003 the Cabinet of Ministers issued a Decree "On additional measures on accelerating the privatization of unprofitable and bankrupt state-owned enterprises and entities".

  According to the Decree, unprofitable and bankrupt state-owned enterprises and entities will be sold to investors at their zero redemption value on the basis of competition and acceptance by an investor of certain investment obligations.

  State-owned enterprises and entities will be sold at their zero redemption value to those investors who would offer best investment projects and take widest commitments, including full repayment of outstanding credit indebtedness.

  Enterprises sold at their zero redemption value will be excused from the repayment of longstanding and unpayable debts to budgetary and non-budgetary funds, including imposed fines and penalties.

  An investor, who would have purchased an enterprise or entity, will be exempted from income (profit) tax.

  Measures on stimulating and encouraging small businesses, considerable simplification of their registration, and, most importantly, the introduction of an effective mechanism of the protection of their rights and interests, have contributed to the development and strengthening of this important sector of our economy.

  There are more than 240,000 small and medium size enterprises in Uzbekistan today. Last year alone 370,000 new workplaces were created. As of the first half of 2003, over 5.3 million people, which is 52,7% of the country's total workforce, have been employed in this sector of the economy. Small and medium size enterprises produce 33,2% of the gross domestic product.

  In 2002 foreign trade turnover of small and medium size enterprises reached 725 million USD. Loans worth 114,9 billion soms were provided in the first half of 2003 to small and medium size enterprises for the purchase of technology, equipment and production materials.

  In general, in the first half of this year the amount of domestic investment has increased by 2,6% and reached one third of GDP. Over 60% of total investment went to the development of the manufacturing industry.

  There have been positive changes in the structure of investment itself—the proportion of decentralized sources of investment, be it enterprises' own resources and funds, commercial bank loans, or direct foreign investment, has grown from 56% to 67%.

  During the first half of 2003, foreign investment worth 200 million USD was attracted. Out of this amount 65 million USD were direct foreign investment, which is 1,9 times more than it was last year.

  As a logical result of the measures on deepening reforms and liberalizing economy, we have achieved the stable and well balanced growth of production: gross domestic product increased by 4,2% in 2002, and by 3,8% in the first half of 2003.

  With the view of ensuring stability of the national currency, this year the Central Bank has taken a number of measures to significantly toughen monetary and credit policy. Besides the cessation of the state budget deficit crediting, control over cumulative monetary aggregates and others, the Central bank has considerably expanded the use of indirect means of monetary and credit policy and adopted a flexible mechanism of control over the interest rates.

  Since September 10, 2003 the Central Bank has lowered the rate of refinancing from 24% to 20%.

  Gradual reduction of the rate of refinancing (in the beginning of the year the rate of refinancing of the Central Bank was 30%) became possible as a result of positive changes in macroeconomic indicators and the considerable decrease of the inflation rate.

  Steps taken to toughen monetary and to increase financial disciplines as well as specific measures to fill the home market with competitive domestically manufactured product have positively effected the inflation rate.

  While in the first half of 2002 the rate of inflation was at 14,4%, than in this year it came to 4,2%, which in turn could not but strengthen our national currency. At the same time it is important to note, that in January through August 2003 there was a deflation of the consumer price index at the rate of 0,7%, which means the reduction of consumer prices in comparison with their growth at 14,1% rate in the same period of 2002.

  Foreign trade turnover for the first half of the year has grown by almost 23%, while export has expanded by 41%. At the same time, the export of finished goods has grown by 1,6 times, and its share in the total export has increased to 41% set against 35% in last year. We have achieved a positive balance of payment at 530 million USD.

  All measures on the bazaars (megamarkets) activity regulations undertaken by the Government were aimed to suppress smuggling and entering counterfeit products into the Uzbek market and as well as for prevention shadow and off bank-assets turnover.

  At the present time all the bazaars in Uzbekistan are open and continuing their activity with the legal assets.

 





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 6 May 2004