Further note from the Foreign and Commonwealth
Office
FCO PSA 4: Improve effectiveness
of the UK contribution to the conflict prevention and management
as demonstrated by a reduction in the number of people whose lives
are affected by violent conflict and a reduction in potential
sources of future conflict, where the UK can make a significant
impact. JOINT TARGET WITH MOD AND DFID
Assessment indicators:
AHEADfour out of four sub-targets must
be either MET or AHEAD
ON COURSEthree out of four sub-targets
must be judged to be ON COURSE
SOME SLIPtwo out of four sub-targets
judged as ON COURSE
MAJOR SLIPonly one out of four sub-targets
judged to be ON COURSE
Progress against the PSA Target in 2000-06 will
be measured using:
(a) Global Pool sub-targets on Afghanistan,
Nepal, Macedonia, Georgia, Israel/Occupied Territories, Sri Lanka,
contribute 25% to PSA target
A 10% reduction in fatalities from
a SIPRI baseline of 7,800 in 2000 to 7,000 by 2006.
A 10% reduction in fatalities from
an IISS baseline of 19,000 to 2000 to 17,000 by 2006.
A 10% reduction in refugees from
a UNHCR baseline of 3,800,000 in 2000 to 3,400,000 by 2006.
A 10% reduction in internally displaced
persons from a USCR baseline of 1,500,000 in 2000 to 1,350,000
by 2006.
(b) Africa Pool sub-targets on Sierra Leone,
DRC, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Sudan, Angola, Nigeria, contribute
25% to PSA target
A 20% reduction in fatalities from
a SIPRI baseline of 6,500 in 2000 to 5,200 by 2006.
A 20% reduction in fatalities from
an IISS baseline of 48,000 in 2000 to 38,000 in 2006.
A 20% reduction in refugees from
a UNHCR baseline of 2,400,000 in 2000 to 1,900,000 by 2006.
A 20% reduction in internally displaced
people from a USCR baseline of 10,300,000 in 2000 to 8,200,000
by 2006.
(c) Conflict Level Assessment Tool sub-targets
contribute 50% to PSA target (25% in each Pool)a new product
measuring variations in potential sources of future conflict is
being created.
Definitions:
(a) The Conflict Prevention Pools
(i) The Global and Africa Pools were created
in April 2001, as policy mechanisms to improve UK conflict prevention
policy and impact using a joined-up approach between FGO, MOD
and DFID. HMT and Cabinet Office also play an important coordinating
role. The Pools bring together peacekeeping and programme budgets,
for the first time.
(ii) FCO manage the Global Poolthe
Foreign Secretary chairs the Cabinet committee; and DFID manage
the Africa Poolthe International Development Secretary
chairs the Cabinet committee.
(b) PSA Target
(i) The PSA target contains two distinct
elements requiring measurement: the number of people whose lives
are affected by conflict and a reduction in the potential sources
of future conflict. Fatalities, refugees, internally displaced
people (IDPs) will measure the first element and the new Conflict
Level Assessment Tool on variations in the level of conflict will
measure the second element.
(ii) Conflict defined by SIPRI is "the
use of armed force between the military forces of two or more
governments, or one government and at least one organised armed
group and the incompatibility concerns control of government and/or
territory".
(iii) "Where the UK can make a significant
contribution" defines the countries/regions where the UK
can make an important input to reducing or preventing conflict.
(c) Sub-Target Indicators
(i) Fatalities according to SIPRI refer to
"total battle related deaths, civilian and military, caused
by warring parties which can be directly connected to the conflict".
IISS use a similar definition.
(ii) A refugee is defined by the 1951 Convention
as "a person who owing to well-founded fear of persecution
for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular
social group or political opinion is outside their country of
nationality and is unable or unwilling to return".
(iii) Internally Displaced People (IDPs)
defined by UN Guiding Principles are "people who are forced
or obliged to flee or leave their homes or places of habitual
residence, to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations
of generalized violence, violations of human rights, natural or
human-made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally
recognised state border".
Issues:
(a) Assessing Progress
(i) An overall assessment of progress will
be based not only on data but also on a narrative assessment,
to compensate for the weakness of data sources on fatalities,
refugees and IDPs eg a major outbreak of conflict in one country
could increase numbers significantly, distorting progress made
in other countries. The UK's diplomatic achievements contributing
to reduced conflict will be cited eg mobilising an effective international
response.
(ii) Progress will initially be measured
separately for each Pool, including the impact of programmes/strategies
in each Pool, before a joint overall assessment is made against
the PSA target.
(iii) The PSA relates to 2003-06, however
baseline data relates to 2000. A time lag of one year exists before
data is available in each year. All baseline data relates to 2000.
A final assessment will be made in 2007 using 2006 data.
(iv) The countries selected for assessing
fatalities, refugees and IDPs is a specific groupit does
not include every country covered by each Pool.
(v) Isolating the UK's distinct contribution
from international and other actors is difficult, and the target
is subject to high risks eg the UK cannot control the policies
of other actors, small arms proliferation etc.
(b) Data limitations
(i) Accurate data on fatalities, refugees
and IDPs is not available but is taken from the best available
sources. For example SIPRI state the figures represent a minimum
indicator but real figures may be much higher.
(ii) Both SIPRI and IISS use the starting
marker of 1,000 battle-related deaths each year for major conflictsan
arbitrary starting point. To provide a more accurate assessment,
additional data from IISS and the States in Armed Conflict Report
is included to capture data on fatalities below 100included
in the 2000 baseline.
(iii) SIPRI and IISS utilize different sources
in collecting data and produce significantly different fatality
statistics for the same conflicts, we will therefore use their
data to assess overall trends.
(iv) Attributing what proportion of refugee/IDP
displacement is caused directly by conflict is acknowledged as
problematic. Refugee data is based on the number of refugees from
each country and not in each country.
SOURCES
(a) Fatalities
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
(SIPRI) Yearbook data and International Institute for Strategic
Studies (IISS) Military Balance data will be used to measure conflict
fatality numbers above 1000. To include fatalities below 1,000,
data from the States in Armed Conflict Report, University of Uppsala
(who produce SIPRI's data) and the IISS Small Conflicts Database
(to be launched publicly in January 2003) is also included in
the baseline/targets.
(b) Refugees
The United Nations High Commission for Refugees
(UNHCR) are mandated to deal with refugees and compile annual
data on refugee numbers in "Populations of Concern to UNHCR".
(c) Internally displaced persons (IDPs)
United States Committee for Refugees (USCR) data
is used for 2000 baseline data because it is the only source available.
However all future assessments will use Global IDP project data
from the Norwegian Refugee Councilbecause it is now recognised
as the best IDP data source combining data from all the main IDP
agencies.
(d) Potential sources of future conflict
A new Conflict Level Assessment Tool is being
developed. This Technical Note will be updated to provide further
details.
FCO PSA 7: Make globalisation work
for sustainable development in the UK and internationally (and
particularly in Africa) by promoting democracy and the rule of
law, good economic and environmental governance, and security
of long-term energy supply, measured by specific underlying targets.
This target will be measured using the following
scorecards (agreed between FCO and HMT) covering the five elements
of the target: (a) increased democracy and the rule of law; (b)
more effective economic governance; (c) more effective environmental
governance; (d) enhanced security of energy supplies; (e) reformed
and efficient international organisations (the UN, OSCE, OECD
and Council of Europe), offering better value for money for the
UK. Scorecards (b)(e) are classified.
(a) Increased democracy and the rule of
law
(i) Number of functioning democracies in
the world increases from 95 in 2003 to 105 in 2006.
Functioning democracies are defined as "independent
countries whose primary legislature and heads of government are
elected by a majority vote from two or more opposing choices by
secret ballot in a climate which fully permits freedom of expression,
assembly and association." Sources for measuring this include:
Freedom House's Democracy Audit; UNDP Human Development Reports;
the State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices;
election monitoring reports from EU. OSCE, Council of Europe,
other regional bodies and NGOs.
(ii) Ratification of any of the six core
human rights treaties by 25 additional states by 2006.
Ratifications are notified to the UN and recorded
immediately on the website of the Office of the High Commissioner
for Human Rights.
(iii) The number of countries with fully
independent and impartial judiciaries increases from 90 in 2003
to 95 in 2006.
A fully independent and impartial judiciary is defined
as: "a judiciary which is able to fulfil its function without
improper influence or inappropriate interference from the executive,
legislature, business interests or other non-state actors; and
in accordance with principles of justice (eg due process and equality
before the law) as set out in the 1985 UN Basic Principles on
the Independence of the Judiciary". Sources available to
measure this include the International Committee of Jurists' (FCO
Human Rights Policy Fund (HRPF)-funded) annual Attacks on Justice
Report; Transparency International reports, the State Department's
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices; International Bar Association
and Law Society reports and other NGO reports.
(iv) More effective machinery of international
justice. Measurements:
International Criminal Court (ICC): 100
ratifications and 20 more States parties complete domestic
implementation legislation by end-2003.
The ICC came into force on
1 July 2002. By September 2002, 79 countries had ratified. Only
9 had completed domestic implementation. The UK assessed contribution
in the First Financial Period (until 31 December 2003) is approximately
£2.25 million.
Satisfactory progress towards
the completion strategy for the International Criminal Tribunal
for Yugoslavia (ICTY), with investigations completed by end-2004.
ICTY was set up in 1994 by UNSCR to try those responsible
for war crimes committed in former Yugoslavia throughout the 1990s;
its temporal jurisdiction remain open. Chief Prosecutor has however
drawn up a strategy to complete trials by 2008. The UK assessed
contribution in 2002/3 is approximately £5.5 million.
Most trials conducted by
the Special Court for Sierra Leone completed by end-2005.
The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SLSC) was established
in July 2002. Aims: to try 20-30 of "those most responsible"
for Sierra Leone war crimes within 4 years of its establishment;
although UNSC mandated, SLSC is a hybrid, funded by voluntary
contributions from States.
African Court of Human
Rights established and becoming functional by end 2006.
At February 2003, six African States have ratified
the Protocol leading to the creation of the Court: another nine
have to do so before the Court can be established.
(b) More effective economic governance
(i) Concrete progress towards the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs).
Progress towards the Millennium Development Goals
is measured at least annually and published by UNDP.
(ii) More countries implementing international
standards on investment, corruption, tax and money laundering.
Measurements:
Two new UK Investment Promotion
and Protection Agreements (IPPAs) each year 2004/05/06.
Ratification of IPPAs is a public, legal act by the
UK and co- signatory government.
(iii) Significant improvements in each year
in economic governance for at least two states identified as having
failed governance, as measured by the World Bank governance survey.
Progress will be measured against the World Bank
triennial survey of economic governance indicators including effective
regulation, sound business environment, rule of law, control of
corruption. Immediate progress can be measured by subsidiary surveys
carried out in different countries during the PSA period. "Significant"
means a statistically significant change as set out in the World
Bank methodology.
(iv) Formal agreement on transparency of
payments from major corporations in extractive industries with
at least five countries by 2004, 10 by 2005.
(c) More effective environmental governance
(i) Effective implementation of a more coherent
approach to environmental governance based on the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP) Cartagena reforms and World Summit
on Sustainable Development (WSSD) Plan of Implementation, including
agreement on universal membership of the Global Ministerial Environmental
Forum and a 30% increase in UNEP core funding by 2005.
Agreement by end of 2004 of a developed role for
the Commission on Sustainable Development that allows it to act
as an integrating mechanism for overall progress on sustainable
development with each individual strand effectively managed by
the appropriate specialist institution. Reports from UNEP and
Post on universal membership and funding.
(ii) Entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol
by August 2003 and an outcome at the Ninth Conference of the Parties
(COP 9) in 2003 which involves developing countries in discussions
on future targets.
Entry in force of Kyoto conditional on ratification
by 55 signatories covering 55% of Annex 1 (developed country)
emissions.
(iv) Significant improvement in both the
legal basis and effective implementation of citizens' access to
justice in priority countries by 2005.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
Aarhus Convention on Access to Environmental Information and Participation
in Decision Making is the benchmark against which progress will
be measured. Priority countries are those in Eastern & Central
Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia (ie non-EU European UNECE
member states) and countries where the Access Initiative operates
(Chile, India, Mexico, Thailand, Indonesia, Uganda, Nigeria).
(d) Enhanced security of energy supplies
(i) Increased diversity of oil supplies to
EU, including through and above trend increased in oil sector
FDI in key oil states by 2005.
Key oil states: Russia, Kazakhstan, Sudan, Libya,
Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea, Angola. Measured by IEA statistics.
(iv) Substantial increase in the share of
new renewable energy sources and energy efficiency technologies
in the energy supply mix non-OECD countries (particularly in Africa)
by 2010, through adoption of national renewable energy goals and
programmes as follow-up to relevant G8 and WSSD initiatives.
Measure increased in renewables using IEA statistics
and through mechanisms set up to monitor and report on achievement
of WSSD goalsfor energy targets likely to be through the
Commission on Sustainable Development.
(e) Reformed and efficient international
organisations (the UN, OECD, OSCE and Council of Europe), offering
better value for money for the UK.
(i) Progressive implementation of improved
budgetary practices across the organisations between end-2003
and end-2004.
Review by December 2003 of OECD's budgeting structure,
including a more rigorous examination of the distorting effects
and opportunity costs of voluntary contributions, enhancing our
ability to target resources at priority activities. Adoption of
revised Financial Regulations by OSCE Permanent Council and introduction
of better co-ordinated, objective-led budget procedures including
improved monitoring and accountability by December 2003. results
based budgeting in all UN budget documents by March 2004.
(ii) Further human resource management reforms
implemented across the organisations by end-2004.
A successful conclusion to the International Civil
Service Commission's review of pay and benefits by December 2003,
which limits costs while preserving the existing agreed methodology,
and ongoing implementation throughout the UN Secretariat of HR
reforms as improved mobility arrangements and performance appraisal
systems. Adoption of revised Staff Regulations by OSCE Permanent
Council and effective deployment (no time lag) of OSCE Human Resources
in the field and at the centre of July 2003.
(iii) Increased efficiency and productivity
gains realised across the organisations by end FY2004-05.
Streamlined working methods across directorates,
through the introduction of clusters of work, leading to less
duplication of effort within OECD by December 2003; Adoption of
CoE of European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) reform plan by June
2003, leading to a faster through-put of cases before the ECHR.
No more than 10% (down from one-third) awaiting judgement beyond
three-year set limit by March 2005.
PSA AND PROGRESS IN ACHIEVING TARGETS
|
SR02 PSA targets | Assessment of progress
|
|
PSA 1: Reduce the threat to the UK from international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Reduce international crime, drugs and people-trafficking affecting the UK, measured by Whitehall-wide targets. Contribute to the reduction of opium production in Afghanistan, with poppy cultivation by 70% within five years and elimination within 10 years.
| Significant progress in some areas but likely final outcome not yet clear.
|
PSA 2: Reduce tension in South Asia, the Middle East, Balkans and elsewhere through action with our international partners, paying particular attention to regions at risk from nuclear confrontation.
| Significant progress in some areas but likely final outcome not yet clear.
|
PSA 3: Strengthen European security through an enlarged and modernised NATO, and effective EU crisis management capacity and enhanced European defence capabilities. JOINT TARGET WITH MOD
| On course. |
PSA 4: Improve effectiveness of the UK contribution to conflict prevention and management as demonstrated by a reduction in the number of people whose lives are affected by violent conflict and a reduction in potential sources of future conflict, where the UK can make a significant impact. JOINT TARGET WITH MOD AND DFID
| Not yet assessed. |
PSA 5: Deliver measurable improvement in the business performance of Trade Partners UK's customers; and maintain the UK as the prime location in the EU for foreign direct investment. JOINT TARGET WITH DTI
| On course with new-to-export firms and investment indicators. Slippage in other areas.
|
PSA 6: Secure agreement by 2005 to a significant reduction in trade barriers leading to improved trading opportunities for the UK in developing countries. JOINT TARGET WITH DTI AND DFID
| Some slippage. |
PSA 7: Make globalisation work for sustainable development in the UK and internationally (and particularly in Africa) by promoting democracy and the rule of law, good economic and environmental governance, and security of long-term energy supply, measured by specific underlying targets.
| Significant progress in some areas but likely final outcome not yet clear.
|
PSA 8: A modern, reformed, and enlarged EU, as measured by progress towards UK policy priorities including economic liberalisation, CAP reform, justice and home affairs, an effective CFSP, and the 2004 IGC; and greater support for Europe in the UK.
| On course. |
PSA 9: Effective advice on, support for, and delivery of Government objectives across the full range of the UK's international interests through a viable and responsive network of diplomatic Posts. Increased influence overseas and improved perceptions of UK and HMG policies, as measured by opinion polls.
| On course. |
PSA 10: Effective and efficient consular and entry clearance services, as measured by specific underlying targets.
| On course with seven out of ten indicators. Some slippage with others.
|
PSA 11: Improvement in the governance, environment and security of the overseas territories, and more diversified economic development, as measured by implementation of the commitments in the 1999 White Paper.
| On course. |
PSA 12: Improve value for money across the full range of FCO, BBC World Service and British Council activities by achieving year on year efficiency gains of 2.5%.
| On course. |
|
Table 1: A summary of the FCO's SR2002 PSA targets and current
progress in achieving them.
|