Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Letter to the Chairman of the Committee from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, 30 March 2004

  Thank you for your letter of 16 March about resourcing the British Embassy in Kuwait. As requested in your letter, I enclose a copy of Kuwait telegram number 30.[1] It is classified as restricted.

  Mr Wilton's telegram was a colourful and successful effort to attract attention to a specific end-of-year funding difficulty in the Embassy in Kuwait. Towards the end of the financial year it is not unusual for posts to face overspends or underspends on their budget allocation. But as FCO resources have become more tightly stretched, Ambassadors have teen told to do everything they can to avoid overspends. So Mr Wilton was right to draw the problem to the attention of officials in London. As usual with such cases, the FCO was able to make good the shortfall in the budget of the Embassy to remove the likelihood of an overspend.

  There was, of course, no chance that we would have allowed the Embassy to close for budgetary reasons.

  I recognise the Committee's concern about the level of FCO resources. Our budgets are tightly stretched, particularly given that the demands for FCO activity are high. To manage this, the FCO must be as efficient in the delivery of its services as it can be. Inevitably this means making difficult choices and finding different ways of running an effective global foreign policy. But that is consistent with what the Government have made clear that they expect from all parts of the public sector.

Rt Hon Jack Straw MP

30 March 2004




1   Not printed Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 September 2004