Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Letter to the Clerk of the Committee from the Parliamentary Relations and Devolution Department, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 23 February 2004

DEPARTMENTAL PROPERTIES

  Thank you for your letter of 5 February requesting further information on the sales and purchases of residential properties by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

  As the Answers to the Parliamentary Question tabled by Mr John Maples MP indicated, we are unable to provide details of individual sales and purchase figures for reasons of commercial confidentiality.

  In the vast majority of cases property sales were not matched by direct purchases. This is because many of the properties which the FCO has sold in recent years have been surplus to requirements; or it was clear that it made more sense, from a value for money viewpoint, to reprovide by leasing replacement assets. I attach a table which indicates the net gain (or loss) of those properties which were sold and where we replaced them by new purchases. As you will note, the FCO did not derive a net gain in all such transactions. To take the Residence in Guatemala as an example, the FCO was clear that the rationale for disposal was that the property concerned was no longer fit for purpose and that it was necessary to invest additional resources in order to acquire a more modern property which did meet our business needs.

  You also asked about the FCO's rental bill during the period 1998-99 to 2002-03. The information is set out below:


1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03

£62,264,785
£63,199,089
£63,247,783
£65,548,520
£63,055,130


  As you will see the FCO rental bill has remained fairly stable during the period in question, helped by movements in exchange rates and favourable market factors. It is difficult to predict how the FCO rent bill will change in future years since this will continue to depend upon changes in market forces which are beyond our control. But I can assure the Committee that the FCO is firmly committed, in its negotiations with individual landlords, to getting the best deal possible from landlords where market conditions permit.

Matthew Hamlyn

Parliamentary Relations and Devolution Department

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

23 February 2004



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 September 2004