Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Second Report



CONTENTS

324. We concluded our July 2003 Report by recommending that the Government "make it a priority to work towards restoring the cohesion of the United Kingdom's international partnerships," to enable it better to face the challenges of the war against terrorism.[339]

325. We are relieved that co-operation in addressing some of the central threats of war against terrorism have not been damaged by the diplomatic disputes that preceded war in Iraq.[340] Intelligence sharing to dismantle al Qaeda, for example, appears to have been unaffected.

326. Other aspects of this crucial campaign have, however, been disrupted by the breakdown of international consensus. On 3 October, the British Special Representative for Iraq, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, was asked in an interview whether he was concerned that the US and the UK were shouldering most of the burden of reconstructing Iraq without international support. He replied that "the leaderships in Washington and London entirely understood what they were taking on, and they were prepared to do this themselves."[341]

327. The past six months in Iraq have demonstrated the extreme difficulties inherent in taking military action, and undertaking state-building projects, without full international support. The difficulties relate not only to questions of 'hard security'—of ensuring enough trained, disciplined and well-equipped international troops on the ground—but also to matters relating to the legitimacy of the operation, in the eyes of Iraqis and others. The problems facing the Coalition in Iraq now may have serious implications for the long term success of the project.

328. In this Report, we have also described a number of policy areas in which multilateral action is achieving positive results. Among the most significant of these was the visit of the Foreign Secretary and his French and German counterparts to Iran in October, which helped to defuse a crisis over Iran's nuclear programme, and to ensure intrusive inspections of nuclear facilities there. This was followed by the breakthrough on Libya's programmes of weapons of mass destruction, again achieved by patient diplomacy involving several nations.

329. We conclude that the threats facing the United Kingdom, both at home and overseas, in the war against terrorism have not diminished. We are encouraged, though, that the Government is working with partners in the European Union, the United Nations and NATO to reassess the respective roles of these multilateral institutions in tackling new security threats; and we commend the Government for its role in fostering this trend.

330. Those who predicted the destabilisation of moderate regimes and the strengthening of extremist regimes in the Middle East following the invasion of Iraq have not been proved correct. There are now enhanced prospects for stability and democratic reforms in Iraq's neighbours, as well as a more favourable context for peace between Iraq and her neighbours than there has been for many decades.


339   HC (2002-03) 405, para 264. Back

340   See paras 258-266. Back

341   Remarks by Sir Jeremy Greenstock, 5 October 2003, available at: http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 February 2004