Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


12.  Memorandum submitted by the Department of Health

  Thank you for your letter to John Reid of 3 February, requesting information on how the Department of Health envisages using ID cards within the NHS to control access to health services, and asking what the practical issues are likely to be.

  I would like to stress at the outset that we see ID cards as a very important tool in helping prevent abuse of NHS facilities by those who are not eligible for free treatment. We therefore welcome the Committee's interest in this whole area. Below I set out the legal position with regard to access to NHS services and then indicate how ID cards would fit into our overall programme to combat inappropriate use of NHS resources. Lastly I set out some of the practical issues in using ID cards within the NHS, including the protection of patient confidentiality and the need to ensure that the use of ID cards does not prejudice access to services by disadvantaged groups who are entitled to them.

  However I should first point out that these are as yet initial thoughts, which we have yet to test with our stakeholders within the NHS and social services. The Home Office's document Identity cards: the next steps, published in November last year, committed the Government to "working with the NHS and other public services to maximise the benefits of a card and minimise the compliance costs". Inevitably the process of consultation with the frontline will have an impact on how we use the card.

LEGAL POSITION ON ACCESS TO TREATMENT

  First the legal position. Your letter talked about controlling access to the NHS. The NHS Act 1977 puts a duty upon the Secretary of State to provide free NHS services to people present in England and Wales, irrespective of nationality, subject to express provisions to make charges. Thus S121 of the Act gives him powers to charge those who are not "ordinarily resident" in Great Britain.

(i)  Hospitals

  The NHS (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989 no 306) ("the charging regulations") have been made under S121 powers and apply to hospital treatment only. The regulations define an overseas visitor as anyone who is not ordinarily resident in the UK, and require providers of NHS hospital treatment to establish whether anyone deemed an overseas visitor is liable to pay charges. "Ordinarily resident" is not defined in the Act, but a House of Lords ruling in 1982 suggests that it is someone who is "living lawfully in the United Kingdom voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of their life for the time being, with an identifiable purpose for their residence here which purpose has a sufficient degree of continuity to be properly described as settled". Individual trusts are responsible for deciding whether someone is, in their view, ordinarily resident. If they are deemed to be ordinarily resident they cannot be charged.

  If a hospital trust decides that someone is not ordinarily resident for the purposes of the charging regulations they must then decide whether that person nevertheless qualifies for one of the other exemptions set out in the charging regulations. If the patient qualifies for an exemption he or she becomes an exempt overseas visitor. Otherwise the patient must be charged. I recently announced that amended charging regulations would be laid to come into force, subject to Parliamentary approval, on 1 April this year, which would tighten up the regulations and close some loopholes.

(ii)  Exempt Treatments

  Treatment in Accident and Emergency departments is always free (but not treatment received thereafter as an in-patient or by referral to an out-patient clinic), as is treatment for a variety of diseases which are public health hazards (eg TB, cholera, smallpox, malaria, rabies etc), compulsory psychiatric treatment and treatment in clinics for sexually transmitted diseases (although in the case of HIV services only the initial testing and associated counselling is free).

(iii)  Primary Care

  At present the charging regulations do not cover primary care. However, I announced on 30 December that we were reviewing this and I plan to announce proposals for consultation shortly. Broadly speaking we propose introducing a charging scheme for primary care which will complement the existing hospital scheme. I will ensure that the Committee receives a copy of the consultation document.

THE ROLE OF ID CARDS

  The Government does not intend to change the current legal framework within which individuals access the NHS but rather to ensure that wherever appropriate charges are levied. ID cards will be a key tool in doing this. Essentially we see ID cards operating as a means of helping the NHS ensure that those who should be charged are charged when individuals first come into contact with a primary care practice or with a hospital. I shall focus on hospital services first.

(i)  Hospital Services

  The charging regulations require that NHS hospital trusts make reasonable enquiries to determine whether a person is liable to be charged for treatment. Typically a trust would first ask whether that person had been resident in the UK for the previous 12 months or longer. If the answer is yes then the person is exempt from charges. (From 1 April 2004, subject to Parliamentary consent, the amended charging regulations will require that the person has been legally resident in the UK for 12 months or more.) The trust may make reasonable enquiries to satisfy themselves that a person has indeed been (legally) resident for more than 12 months; one way of doing this would be to check with the National Identity Register whether the person registered was legally resident in the UK and had been so for more than 12 months. The National Identity Register would hold information on an individual's current and historical addresses and residential statuses (including the entitlement to remain in the UK), which would make this possible. What the Register might not be able to do is check whether someone had registered, then gone abroad and returned. However, this would be possible if ID cards were linked with the IND (Immigration and Nationality Directorate) long-term e-borders programme which would allow electronic embarkation controls to monitor movements in and out of the country.

  If the person has been in the country less than 12 months the trust will make enquiries as to whether he or she is nevertheless ordinarily resident, using the interpretation established by the House of Lords in 1982. If the trust decides that the patient is not ordinarily resident they must then decide whether any of the exemptions set out in the charging regulations apply to the patient. These exemptions include, to quote a few examples, people who come to the UK to take up permanent residence, anyone employed (from 1 April 2004, subject to amended regulations coming into force) by a UK-based company, UK citizens temporarily working abroad, asylum seekers and those granted refugee status. An ID card would help NHS staff ascertain that an individual was indeed eligible for free NHS treatment. For example, the National Identity Register would indicate the immigration status of individuals and the terms and conditions of that entitlement to remain in the UK, including whether they were eligible to work.

  I must stress however that because the criteria for registering a person for an ID card and the criteria for free treatment are not, and realistically could not be, wholly aligned, possession of an ID card in itself will not guarantee free treatment, nor will not having an ID card render an individual liable to charges. For example, the employment exemption requires the overseas visitor to be in employment, not merely to have the right to work, and so a letter from an employer might also be required. And individuals from countries with whom the UK has a reciprocal healthcare agreement will usually not have an ID card if they are here for a short visit but will be eligible for free treatment for conditions which arise during the course of their visit.

(ii)  Primary Care

  There are currently no charging regulations in place relating to primary care. However, as I mentioned above, we intend to consult on introducing a charging regime into primary care which would complement the hospital charging regime. ID cards would have a prime place in ensuring that those who should pay charges do so, but GPs would still provide any emergency or immediate and necessary treatment, based on their clinical judgement. They will also be able to continue to see and treat patients on a private fee-paying basis. As I mentioned above, I will bring forward proposals for consultation shortly.

PRACTICAL ISSUES IN USING ID CARDS

  You asked what the practical issues are likely to be in using ID cards. Probably the most important issue for the Department of Health and NHS is ensuring that ID cards support the duty of confidentiality owed by NHS staff to patients. In using ID cards we would need to ensure that no confidential patient information could be disclosed, either deliberately or inadvertently, to unauthorised persons. The National Identity Register would not contain any such confidential information and checks of ID cards would simply be to help verify ensure whether an individual was or was not eligible for free treatment. We have been very clear that organisations using the National Identity Register to verify identity will not be able to access health information.

  It will be important to ensure that there is no room for breaching confidentiality, nor for the appearance of any such breach. So we intend to ensure that the IT infrastructure being put in place to support wider access by clinicians and other authorised persons to patient records will be kept quite separate from any IT infrastructure required to handle ID cards.

  A linked point is ensuring that ID cards are introduced in such a way as to retain public support for their use to demonstrate eligibility for free NHS treatment. We need to ensure that ID cards are not used in a discriminatory fashion which raises barriers to disadvantaged groups accessing NHS care to which they are entitled. This will be an important point to test when we consult more widely with stakeholders.

  A further practical issue is the IT investment which will be required to support checks of ID cards. We do not have firm figures for this at present as it requires further work on how exactly a card will be used and studies of the technologies which will be available once the scheme is up and running. We will continue to work with colleagues in the Home Office to ensure that the needs of the NHS are built into the design of the scheme from the outset.

Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Minister of State

March 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 July 2004