Select Committee on Health Memoranda


Memorandum by the Department of Health (PE 1) (continued)

Figure 2.3.1(a)









NEW PROGRAMME BUDGET METHODOLOGY

BACKGROUND

  6.  In 2002, the Department initiated the national Programme Budgeting Project. The aim of the Project is to develop a primary source of information, which can be used by all bodies, to give a greater understanding of "where the money is going" and "what we are getting for the money we invest" in the NHS. The Project aims to provide an answer to these two questions by mapping all PCT (and Strategic Health Authority) expenditure, including that on primary care services, to 23 programmes of care based primarily on medical conditions (see Appendix).

  7.  A focus on medical condition rather than input cost forges a closer and more obvious link between the object of expenditure and the patient care it delivers. Analysis of expenditure in this way should help PCTs examine the health gain that can be obtained from investment; and will help inform understanding around equity and how patterns of expenditure map to the epidemiology of the local population.

  8.  In evidence to the Committee (October 2003) Secretary of State emphasised his oversight of the new system of Programme Budgeting. In summary, he sees it as a key strand of work to demonstrate delivery of the NHS Plan, of judging investment against outcome, and to show that new money has been spent to boost the services it was intended for.

BACKGROUND TO PROGRAMME BUDGETING

  1.  Programme Budgeting had its roots in the Rand Corporation in the USA in the 1950s. Its first major application was for the US Department of Defence in the 1960s where it was used as part of a cost accounting tool that could display, over time, the deployment of resources towards specific military objectives. Such objectives were looked at in terms of wars overseas, the support of NATO or the defence of the homeland, instead of the conventional "inputs based" budgetary headings of tanks, missiles or diesel fuel. Allocation of new resources, or shifts between budgets, could be judged on their relative contribution to these specific objectives.

  2.  This approach can be applied to healthcare. Instead of seeing investment on the level of a hospital or drug budget, the focus switches to specific health objectives or medical conditions. The aim is to maximise health gain through deploying available resources to best effect. This aim complements the commissioning role of PCTs.

FINANCIAL YEARS 2003-04 AND 2002-03

  3.  From financial year 2003-04 onwards, each PCT (and Strategic Health Authority) will report within their annual accounts the totality of their expenditure on a programme basis each year. This "bottom up" information will be available in the Autumn. In the interim, the NAO and HM Treasury requested that the Department provide a "top down" analysis of expenditure (by programme budget category) for inclusion within Schedule 5 of the 1Department's 2002-03 Resource Accounts. The figures within Schedule 5 are repeated in the table below:

Table 2.3.1(b)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH—RESOURCE ACCOUNTS 2002-03

Schedule 5

The Key objectives are:

  A.  To reduce the incidence of avoidable illness, disease and injury in the population.

  B.  To treat people with illness, disease or injury quickly, effectively and on the basis of need alone.

  C.  To enable people who are unable to perform essential activities of daily living, including those with chronic illness, disability or terminal illness, to live as full and normal lives as possible.

  D.  To maximise the social development of children within stable family settings.

  The Department cannot currently make a reliable estimation of the split of overall spend against each of these objectives. The Department is working to ensure that the information presented in Schedule 5 allows a more detailed analysis of expenditure against their objectives. As a result of the first stage of this work the Department is now able to reliably estimate the split of overall spend against conditions. This is reproduced below.

Resources by Programme Budget Categories

for the year ended 31 March 2003


Gross
Income
Net

£'000
£'000
£'000
Programme Budget Categories
The Department of Health's overall aim is to improve the health and wellbeing of the people of England through the resources available to prevent/treat:
All diseases caused by infectious organisms, (excluding Tuberculosis and Sexually transmitted disease)
825,528
22,066
803,462
All cancers and tumours, malignant and benign (including those with suspected or at risk of developing cancer)
3,330,722
54,629
3,276,093
Disorders of the blood or blood forming systems
707,049
10,551
696,498
Disorders of internal metabolism and its regulation
1,366,423
55,997
1,310,426
Problems of mental health (including patients with Alzheimer's syndrome)
6,130,307
112,074
6,018,233
Patients where the primary issue is the problem of learning disability
1,662,074
610
1,661,464
Problems relating to the neurological system
1,465,595
32,615
1,432,980
Problems relating to the eye and vision
1,282,192
17,870
1,264,322
Problems relating to the ear and hearing and balance
287,665
5,856
281,809
Problems relating to the heart, and the circulation of blood in the central and peripheral vessels
5,776,608
162,269
5,614,339
Problems of respiration, (including tuberculosis and sleep apnoea)
2,849,492
71,866
2,777,626
Problems due to the teeth, (including preventive checks and community surveys)
2,271,454
493,649
1,777,805
Problems of gastro intestinal system
3,527,222
81,774
3,445,448
Problems of the skin
1,074,295
28,247
1,046,048
Problems of the musculo skeletal system (excluding trauma)
3,211,157
59,008
3,152,149
Problems due to trauma, and injuries (including burns)
3,292,058
49,258
3,242,800
Disorders of the genito urinary system (except for those relating to infertility)  
2,672,580
47,329
2,625,251
Maternity and problems associated with reproduction
2,976,972
42,880
2,934,092
Conditions of babies in the neonatal period
751,339
10,084
741,255
Poisoning, toxic effects and other adverse events, whether accidental or deliberate
569,398
7,642
561,756
Individuals who have no current problems but who are involved in programs for prevention of illness and promotion of good health  
815,956
17,491
798,465
Problems related to life-management difficulty and problems related to care-provider dependency
183,136
2,458
180,678
Other Areas of Spend/Conditions:
  —  General Medical Services/Personal Medical Services
3,280,510
3,280,510
  —  Strategic Health Authorities (including Workforce Development Confederations)
3,646,783
294,900
3,351,883
  —  National Insurance Contribution
6,396,924
(6,396,924)
  —  Miscellaneous
6,007,636
1,133,974
4,873,662

Net Operating Cost
59,964,151
9,212,021
50,752,130


Note:
This schedule was not prepared in this format in 2001-02, therefore comparatives are not available for 2001-02.

The analysis contained in Schedule 5 uses 2002-03 activity indicative provider costs (reference costs) and prescribing information as the basis for apportioning the totality of NHS/Department spend across various programme budget categories. In 2003-04, the analysis will be based on a "bottom up" approach. All PCTs will allocate/apportion their spend at the local level and report the results to the Department. The 2003-04 Schedule 5 will be an aggregate of these returns.

Programme Budget Categories


PBCDescription Expanded description

1Infectious Diseases All disease caused by infectious organisms, excluding Tuberculosis and Sexually transmitted disease
2Cancers & Tumours All cancers and tumours, malignant and benign. Including those with suspected or at risk of developing cancer
3Blood DisordersDisorders of the blood and blood forming systems
4Endocrine, Nutritional and Metabolic Problems [ENM] Disorders of internal metabolism and its regulation
5Mental Health Problems Problems of mental health including patients with Alzheimer's syndrome
6Learning Disability Problems Patients where the primary issue is the problem of learning disability
7Neurological System Problems Problems relating to the Neurological system
8Eye/Vision Problems Problems relating to the eye and vision
9Hearing ProblemsProblems relating to the ear and hearing and balance
10Circulation Problems Problems relating to the heart, and the circulation of blood in central and peripheral vessels
11Respiratory System Problems Problems of respiration, including tuberculosis and sleep apnoea
12Dental ProblemsProblems due to the teeth, including preventive checks and community surveys
13Gastro Intestinal System Problems Problems of the gastro intestinal systems
14Skin ProblemsProblems of the skin, including breast.
15Musculo Skeletal System Problems (excluding Trauma) Problems of the Musculo Skeletal system, excluding trauma
16Trauma & Injuries (inc burns) Problems of Trauma & Injuries (including burns)
17Genito Urinary System Disorders (except infertility) All Genito urinary problems except for those relating to infertility
18Maternity & Reproductive Health Maternity and problems associated with reproduction
19NeonatesConditions of babies in the neonatal period
20PoisoningPoisoning, toxic effects and other adverse events, whether accidental or deliberate
21Healthy Individuals Individuals who have no current problems but who are involved in programs for prevention of illness and promotion of good health
22Social Care Needs Problems related to life-management difficulty and problems related to care-provider dependency
23OtherOther conditions and Other congenital malformations


2.4  EXPENDITURE ON COMMUNITY CARE

2.4.1  Could the Department provide a table showing, by service, net expenditure in real terms by central and local government on community care, broken down by residential and non-residential care (taking into account relevant service pay and price increases), over the most recent five year period for which such data are available? Could this data include Social Security and Housing expenditures contributing to Community Care objectives? Could it also show this data in graphical form? [2.4.1]

  1.  Table 2.4.1 provides details of central and local government net expenditure on services for community care in England, for 1998-99 to 2002-03, the latest year for which information is available. All figures have been adjusted to 2002-03 prices using the latest Gross Domestic Product deflator.

  2.  Community care expenditure is taken to mean expenditure on non-residential and residential care provided or arranged by local authorities for adults; community health services provided by the NHS for adults; certain social security benefits which support community care objectives; and certain expenditure on housing. Calculation of local authority expenditure by client group involves a degree of estimation.

  3.  The data in the table are set out in graphical form in Figure 2.4.1. The graph shows that since 1998-99 there has been real terms growth in expenditure on all services, with the exception of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) supported residential care. The reason for the decline in the DWP supported residential care expenditure was as a direct result of the April 1993 community care reforms. These reforms transferred care management and funding responsibility for new admissions to independent sector care homes to local authorities and ended the former system of higher Income Support payments for people in such homes unless they had preserved rights.

Table 2.4.1

NET EXPENDITURE ON SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY CARE (2002-03 PRICES) ENGLAND


£ million
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03

A.  Local Authority Domiciliary Care (1)(2)
Assessment and Care Management
887
944
998
1,078
1,170
Direct Payments
11
44
51
58
82
Home Care
1,378
1,447
1,490
1,533
1,585
Day Care for Older People
202
211
249
267
272
Day Care for Other Adults
583
613
644
662
693
Equipment and Adaptations
71
76
114
126
126
Meals
50
55
61
60
57
Other Services
412
436
360
365
348
Total A
3,594
3,825
3,967
4,148
4,332
B.  Community Health (3-7)
Chiropody
100
106
114
147
210
Family Planning
66
71
78
97
129
Immunisation and Surveillance
3
3
4
2
2
Screening
67
72
78
91
132
Professional Advice and Support
126
127
129
59
39
General Patient Care
1,092
1,059
1,036
766
710
Community MI Nursing
603
682
779
795
870
Community MH Nursing
401
415
436
400
423
Community Maternity
244
223
202
292
163
Health Promotion
61
62
64
30
61
Community Dental
97
104
114
73
183
Services to GPs
240
297
364
472
701
Other CHS
360
412
476
469
854
Total B
3,460
3,634
3,874
3,693
4,477
Total A plus B
7,054
7,459
7,842
7,841
8,808
C.  Local Authority Residential Care for (1)(2)
Older People (Aged 65 or over)
2,277
2,364
2,335
2,368
2,711
Adults aged under 65 with:
A Physical Disability or Sensory Impairment
179
192
200
207
274
Learning Disabilities
683
741
809
856
1,122
Mental Health Needs
178
182
203
217
267
Total C
3,317
3,479
3,547
3,648
4,374
D.  Income Support: Residential Care,Nursing Homes and Residential Allowance Cases (8-13)
1,705
1,565
1,487
1,408
600
Total C plus D
5,022
5,044
5,034
5,056
4,974
E.  Other Social Security Benefits (8-17)
Attendance Allowance (14)
2,408
2,479
2,568
2,651
2,665
Disability Living Allowance (14)
4,660
4,866
5,141
5,465
5,663
Invalid Care Allowance
712
744
763
800
825
Independent Living Fund (9 and 15)
104
102
112
117
145
Social Fund Community Care Grants (16)
84
83
84
84
85
Total E
7,968
8,273
8,667
9,115
9,383
F.  Housing (20-22)
Adaptations to all LA Dwellings for Older People and Disabled Adults (17)
99
100
99
110
114
LA Grants; Disabled Facilities Grants (18)
117
124
139
150
174
Housing Corporations; ApprovedDevelopment Programme (ADP) (19)
78
140
128
123
137
LA Sponsored RSL (LASHG) (19)
56
50
60
52
51
Total F
349
415
426
434
476
Total E plus F
8,317
8,688
9,093
9,549
9,859
Grand Total A to F
20,393
21,191
21,969
22,446
23,641




  Footnotes to table:

Sections A and C

  1.  Local Authority expenditure for 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 is obtained from the PSS EX1 return; individual service lines include overhead costs. For years prior to 2000-01 it is obtained from the RO3 current expenditure return but with a share of overhead costs allocated to service lines on a pro-rata basis. Figures for 2000-01 and 2001-02 are therefore not strictly comparable with those for earlier years. The RO3 return was redesigned in 1998-99 and equipment and adaptations and meals were made memorandum items leading to some under-recording and consequent inflation of the other services expenditure; data for these items for 1998-99 and 1999-2000 are therefore not strictly comparable with those for earlier years. Expenditure on direct payments was only recorded from 1998-99 onwards.

  2.  Assessment and care management, although included under local authority non-residential care in Part A, also includes expenditure which is relevant to residential care (Part C).

Section B

  3.  As it is not possible to supply net expenditure figures from the Hospital and Community health Services (HCHS) programme budget, figures are gross expenditure and this may mean that they are slightly overstated.

  4.  For figures derived from the HCHS programme budget analysis, it has been assumed that the following has been spent on adults: approximately 90% of chiropody, 95% of family planning, 1% of immunisation and surveillance, 100% of screening, 35% of professional advice and support, 95% of total general patient care, 95% of community mental illness nursing, 80% of community learning disability nursing, 70% of health promotion and services to GPs under open access and other community spending. It has also been assumed that 100% of maternity care is spent on the delivery and no costs are associated with the mother, and that 100% of community dental is spent on children.

  5.  The above allocations have been taken from the Expenditure Per Head Of Population exercise.

  6.  Administration costs for community health services are not separately identifiable and are not included in the community health figures.

  7.  In 1996-97 several categories of the programme budget were affected by the changes to accounting practice and the changing structure of the NHS. Included in these was the need to capitalise redundancy payments and recharges were no longer included.

Sections D & E

  8.  Figures for 1999-2000 onwards are on a Resource Accounting and Budgeting basis.

  9.  All figures are based on information received from DWP ASD Information Centre on caseload and average weekly amounts. except for Independent Living Fund which is 85% of GB Outturn except for 2002-03 figures are those which underlie the Public Expenditure.

  10.  Any change in expenditure from previous published figures is due to enhancements to methodology or the availability of more up to date information.

  11.  Income Support Quarterly Statistical Enquiries, May 1996 to February 2003.

  12.  Expenditure is based on Preserved Rights Residential Care and Nursing Home cases and Residential Allowance cases for England.

  13.  Excludes unemployed claimants who are now provided for by Jobseekers Allowance.

  14.  Disability Living Allowance replaced Attendance Allowance (for people under 65) in 1992.

  15.  Expenditure for Independent Living Fund estimated as 85% of Great Britain out-turn as at September 2003.

  16.  Final Grant Expenditure. Information derived from Social Fund Computer System.

  17.  Invalid Carers Allowance was renamed Carer's Allowance in April 2003.

  18.  From April 2002 claimants in Residential Care and Nursing Homes had preserved rights abolished and became the responsibility of local authorities. With the introduction of Pension Credit residential allowance rate of Income Support was withdrawn in October 2003.

  19.  2002-03 is partly based on forecasts, with the latest actual data in the model being August 2003.

Section FSource: Housing Investment Programme (HIP) Annual Plan returns (section 5) and HIP BPAM from 2001 onwards.

  20.  Disabled Facilities Grants are paid to the private sector, including RSL tenants, and also to LA tenants; figures shown represent totals of mandatory and discretionary grants under relevant Acts. Source: ODPM P1D returns; and HIP HSSA 2002 return for 1997-98 onwards.

  21.  Housing Corporation ADP approvals for schemes by Registered Social Landlords (mostly housing associations) in respect of homes for rent and sale to certain "special needs" groups (frail elderly, people with mental health problems, learning, or physical disabilities) and one "general needs" group (elderly with warden support). This covers the Corporation's own programme and joint schemes, and also local authority-sponsored schemes using Local Authority Social Housing grant. Source: Housing Corporation Stewardship Report: elderly and disabled categories only.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 February 2005