Select Committee on Health Memoranda


Memorandum by the Department of Health (PE 1) (continued)

3.  NHS RESOURCES AND ACTIVITY

3.1  General

  3.1.1  Could the Department update tables 3.1.1 showing gross expenditure on HCHS by service sector and age group for the latest year for which data are available? [3.1.1]

  3.1.2  Could the Department update tables 3.1.2, showing gross expenditure on Family Health Services? [3.1.2]

  3.1.3  Could the Department update tables 3.1.3, integrating expenditure on HCHS and FHS? Could this integrated information also be provided by Strategic Health Authority area? [3.1.3]

  3.1.4  Could the Department give an account of the funding streams for the General Medical Services budget and provide a trend analysis? [3.1.4]

3.2  Inflation

  3.2.1  Could the Department give an explanation as to the level of funding set aside for inflation in 2004-05? In particular, can it give the average pay awards to each (subjective) staff group and the inflation assumptions for non pay including capital charges? [3.2.1]

  3.2.2  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the components of the health specific inflation indices for revenue spending on HCHS and Family Health Services respectively, together with capital spending on HCHS? The tables for the HCHS should show separate inflation indices for Review Body staff and non-Review Body staff pay, and whatever other breakdowns of staff are available. [3.2.2]

  3.2.3  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the increases in expenditure on the NHS in cash terms, real terms (GDP deflator) and real terms (NHS deflator)? [3.2.3]

  3.2.4  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the construction of the NHS inflation index from main sub-indices of pay and other factor costs since 1992, and comment on the assumptions underlying this construct? Would the Department provide the weights used for each sub-index, for each year? [3.2.4]

3.3  Hospital and Community Health Services Allocations and Distance from Targets

  3.3.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in table 3.3.1 in response to last year's questionnaire on allocations covering HCHS and FHS for each SHA area together with estimates of distances from target needs based expenditure? [ 3.3.1]

3.4  Public Health

  3.4.1 How many public health posts are there now in (a) PCTs and (b) Strategic Health Authorities? [3.4.1]

3.5  Care of Mental Health and Learning Disability Patients

  3.5.1  Could the Department update the information given in Tables 3.5.1, on patients under the care of a learning disability or mental illness consultant, discharges by length of stay, ages and destination, and residential and other places available? Could the Department identify the number of individuals concerned, and hence the number of repeat discharges? [3.5.1]

  3.5.2  Could the Department please update tables 3.5.2, showing:

    (i)  number of people sectioned, by trust and by type of section?

    (ii)  number of people sectioned in proportion to HA population? If the data are not available, will the Department consider obtaining it from the HES?

    (iii)  number of people sectioned in proportion to number of admissions?

    (iv)  proportion of people who appeal against being sectioned and the outcomes of the appeals? [3.5.2]

  3.5.3  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire showing, over the last four years, the numbers of people with mental health problems and with learning disabilities who have been in special hospitals, prisons and regional secure units? [3.5.3]

3.6  Expenditure on Prescribing

  3.6.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in table 3.6.1 response to last year's questionnaire regarding total NHS expenditure on pharmaceuticals for the past four years, including a breakdown by sector and by generic/branded drugs. [3.6.1]

  3.6.2  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in Table 3.6.4 regarding the likely costs of NICE recommendations for the current financial year? [3.6.2]

  3.6.3  How much is spent annually by the Department on promoting the dissemination of drug prescribing information from independent sources (eg drug bulletins)?

  3.6.4  How much is spent annually by the Department on investigating the prevalence, cost and reduction of adverse drug effects, including costs associated with related actions for clinical negligence?

  3.6.5  How much is spent annually by the Department on the deployment of post-marketing surveillance systems, education and training programmes and other measures intended to improve standards of drug prescribing and reduce levels of drug injury?

  3.6.6  We have been informed that synthetic "human" insulin is currently the automatic first line treatment for people with insulin-requiring diabetes, and that synthetic insulin analogues are now beginning to take over from synthetic "human" insulin as a first line treatment. Could the Department provide information on the amount that is spent annually on different types of insulin, indicating what national policy informs decision-making on NHS use of different types of insulin?

3.7  National Specialist Services

  3.7.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in Table 3.7.1 in response to last year's questionnaire? [3.7.1]

  3.7.2  Could the Department specify the proportion of the acute commissioning budget currently spent on specialised services? Could this please be broken down by PCT region?

  3.7.3  Could the Department outline any changes in the overall pattern of expenditure on specialised services since the devolution of responsibility for commissioning to PCTs?

  3.7.4  Could the Department specify which healthcare resource groups (HRGs) currently capture specialist services?

  3.7.5  Could the Department specify how much additional resource have Foundation Trusts had to draw from the "risk pool" established by the Department? What proportion of this was attributable to expenditure on specialised services?

3.8  Management and Administration Costs

  3.8.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in Table 3.8.1 in response to last year's questionnaire? [3.8.1]

  3.8.2  What was the expenditure and staffing (WTE) of each of the Department of Health's Arm's Length Bodies in 2003-04?

  3.8.3  Could the department please update the information provided in tables 3.8.3 on the redundancy costs for senior executives arising from Trust mergers in the past three years? The information should be provided as a global figure and on a trust-by-trust basis. [3.8.3]

  3.8.4  The reduction of 1,400 posts across the Department introduced through the Change Programme will bring a redesign of key business processes within the Department. Could the Department comment on how this will affect Parliamentary-related work, NHS data collection, and the future support of the PEQ?

3.9  Activity and waiting times

  3.9.1  Could the Department update the information given in Tables 3.9.1 showing activity data by region, including: total activity, with trends; activity by Inpatient, Day-Case and Outpatient; maternity and simple access data? Could the Department provide figures for the ratio of Finished Consultant Episodes (FCEs) to hospital spells by Region for the same period? To what extent do a relatively small number of providers depart from the overall pattern? Could the Department report on the progress made by the NHS Information Authority in reviewing clinical information, including the use of the FCE as a measure of activity? [3.9.1]

  3.9.2  Could the Department update the information given in Tables 3.9.2 in relation to the average daily number of available and occupied beds and throughput? [3.9.2]

  3.9.3  Could the Department provide figures for the number of delayed discharges of patients from acute settings in each of the four most recent quarters, broken down by region, reason for delay, age of patient and length of stay? Could these figures show absolute numbers and rates? [3.9.3]

  3.9.4  Could the Department please update the information provided last year in Tables 3.9.4 and Figures 3.9.4 on waiting lists/time? [3.9.4]

  3.9.5  Could the Department please provide an update of Tables 3.9.5 on outpatient waiting times? [3.9.5]

  3.9.6  Could the Department update the information given in Tables 3.9.6? [3.9.6]

  3.9.7  Could the Department update the information provided in Tables 3.9.7? [3.9.7]

  3.9.8  Could the Department update the information provided in Table 3.9.8? [3.9.8]

  3.9.9  Could the Department update the information provided in Tables 3.9.9? [3.9.9]

  3.9.10  What additional mechanisms have been put in place since last year's response to deal with waiting lists/time, and what has been the cost of these additional mechanisms? [3.9.10]

  3.9.11  What progress has the Department made in identifying a better way of measuring NHS productivity? What elements of a productivity measure have so far been selected?

  3.9.12  For a number of years, Cost Weighted Efficiency Index (CWEI) has been used to assess NHS efficiency growth. This measure has become inadequate as a measure of efficiency due to changes in recent years in the way health care is delivered. New development to replace the CWEI was mentioned in the 2003 Departmental Report as well as this year's. Could the Department provide an update on this?

3.10  Payment by results

  3.10.1  How much NHS expenditure was paid to Trusts via HRG tariff based payments in 2003-04? How much activity did it purchase? What are expected expenditure and activity under "payment by results' in 2004-05 and 2005-06?

3.1  General

  3.1.1  Could the Department update tables 3.1.1 showing gross expenditure on HCHS by service sector and age group for the latest year for which data are available? [3.1.1]

  1.  The data requested are shown in Table 3.1.1.

Table 3.1.1

HCHS EXPENDITURE BY SECTOR AND AGE GROUP 2002-03


£ million
Service sector
All births
Age0-4
Age 5-15
Age 16-44
Age 45-64
Age 65-74
Age 75-84
Age 85+
TOTAL

Acute
0
1,419
692
2,774
3,858
3,995
4,194
2,356
19,289
Geriatrics (1)
0
11
27
161
220
395
853
716
2,382
Mental Health
0
11
61
1,895
996
572
726
338
4,598
Other
98
137
76
445
479
449
512
299
2,495
Other Community
111
498
445
968
406
199
268
175
3,071
Learning Disability
0
34
147
725
479
61
19
6
1,470
Maternity (2)
1,200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,200
HQ Admin (3)
24
36
24
118
109
96
111
66
582

TOTAL
1,433
2,146
1,472
7,085
6,545
5,767
6,683
3,956
35,087

Footnotes:

1.  Expenditure on those under 65 occurs in the elderly sector due to the allocation of general community patient care (which includes district nursing and chiropody) to this sector. Both of these initially provided services aimed at the elderly although their role has now become more wide spread across different age groups.

2.  In calculating expenditure by age it has been assumed that all expenditure in Maternity is spent on the baby. No allocation, from the total has been allocated to the costs incurred by the mother (eg hotel costs, complications, etc).

3.  HQ administration has been allocated according to the expenditure already known within the relevant age groups.

  2.  The latest year for which disaggregated data are available is 2002-03 since the allocation of programme age-related activity data is reliant on patient level data from the Hospital Episode system (HES).

  3.  The proportion of HCHS expenditure by programme of care is as follows:

Programme of Care
Proportion of expenditure
Acute services
55%
Mental health
13%
Services intended primarily for the elderly
7%
Other services
18%
Learning disability
4%
Maternity
3%


  4.  The proportion of HCHS expenditure by age group is as follows:

Age band
Proportion of expenditure
All births
4%
Age 0-4
6%
Age 5-15
4%
Age 16-44
20%
Age 45-64
19%
Age 65-74
16%
Age 75-84
19%
Age 85+
11%


  5.  Services aimed specifically, or mainly, at the elderly account for 7% of total HCHS expenditure. However, those aged 65 and over accounted for 47% of total expenditure despite being only 16% of the population. This is mainly due to high levels of spend in other sectors, with 55% of acute expenditure, and significant proportions of expenditure on services for mentally ill people being used by this age group.

  3.1.2  Could the Department update tables 3.1.2, showing gross expenditure on Family Health Services? [3.1.2]

  1.  The information requested showing gross expenditure on FHS in 2002-03 and 2003-04 is contained in Table 3.1.2.

Table 3.1.2

FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES GROSS EXPENDITURE 2002-03 to 2003-04


  
2002-03
£m
2003-04
£m

Drugs Total (1)
6,345
6,948
GMS Non-Discretionary
2,068
1,908
GMS Discretionary
840
787
Total GMS of which:
2,908
2,695
PMS (discretionary) (2)
1,152
2,060
GDS (4)
1,709
1,767
PDS (discretionary) (2) (3)
41
65
Dispensing Costs
918
959
GOS
304
318
Total Other FHS
4,124
5,169
Total FHS
13,377
14,812

Footnotes:

1.  Drugs data source: Prescription Pricing Authority, England. Figures include amounts paid to pharmacy and appliance contractors by the PPA and amounts authorised for dispensing doctors and personal administration in England, for financial years April to March. The data do not cover costs for drugs prescribed in hospital but dispensed in the community or private prescriptions.
  
2.Personal Medical Services (PMS) and Personal Dental Services (PDS) schemes are Primary Care Act pilots designed to test locally managed approaches to the delivery of primary care. PDS and PMS expenditure figures exclude any related capital investment by NHS trusts; PDS expenditure figures are also gross of patient charge income.
  
3.  PDS expenditure figures are also gross of patient charge income.
  
4.  The gross GDS costs include the cost of refunds to patients who incorrectly paid income charges.
  
5.All figures are resource figures and are provisional as final returns are still to be received.
  
6.  On a much smaller scale, the growth rates of GDS and PDS services will have been affected by some transfers of activity between the two services.
  
7.  Growth in dispensing costs is affected by the inclusion of an increasing element (around £30 million in 2003-04) in PMS disretionary expenditure.


3.1.3  Could the Department update tables 3.1.3, integrating expenditure on HCHS and FHS? Could this integrated information also be provided by Strategic Health Authority area? [3.1.3]

  1.  The information requested is contained in Table 3.1.3. Note that the data provided historically to produce this table is no longer collected—as explained in question 2.3.1. The table has therefore been changed to reflect this.

  2.  It is not possible to produce the HCHS programme budget figures at Strategic Health Authority area level.

Table 3.1.3

HCFHS PROGRAMME BUDGET EXPENDITURE 2002-03 PRICES (Real Terms)


£ million
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03

Acute IP
Acute IP (Pats using a bed) inc DC
10,697
11,168
11,836
12,835
13,765
Acute OP
Acute OP without Day Cases
4,256
4,389
4,595
4,957
5,524
Obstetric IP
837
859
895
777
854
Obstetric OP
161
169
180
156
183
Geriatric IP
1,246
1,304
1,386
1,357
1,254
Units for YD
Geriatric & YD OP
54
57
60
63
68
Learning Disability IP
904
916
942
933
843
Learning Disability OP
23
22
22
24
43
Mental Health IP
1,993
2,192
2,441
2,526
2,689
Mental Health OP
366
396
435
506
655
Non Psychiatric DP (gen and acute)
115
123
134
99
85
Learning Disability Day Pats
68
66
66
52
58
Mental Illness DP
348
351
359
329
344
Other Hospital
578
1,084
1,663
1,613
1,563

Total Hospital
21,646
23,097
25,014
26,227
27,928

Chiropody
111
118
127
163
231
Family Planning
70
75
82
102
135
Immunisation and surveillance
331
349
373
249
218
Screening
67
72
78
91
131
Professional advice & support
361
363
369
169
110
General Patient Care
1,151
1,116
1,091
806
743
Community MI Nursing
635
719
821
837
911
Community MH Nursing
501
519
545
501
526
Community Maternity
244
223
203
292
162
Health Promotion
87
89
92
43
86
Community Dental
97
104
114
73
182
Services to GP's
344
425
521
675
996
Other CHS
514
589
680
671
1,212

Total Community
4,513
4,759
5,095
4,672
5,644

Ambulances
676
757
856
963
932
HQ Administration
841
838
845
1,137
582
Joint Finance
259
181
96
56
0

Total HCHS
27,935
29,632
31,907
33,054
35,087

Total GMS of which:
3,460
3,612
3,653
3,251
2,908
Non-Discretionary
2,486
2,654
2,659
2,365
2,068
Discretionary
973
958
995
886
840

Total Other FHS of which:
7,554
8,031
8,338
9,303
10,469

Drugs
4,828
5,253
5,474
5,746
6,342
PMS (discretionary) (1)
617
1,152
GDS
1,594
1,599
1,648
1,684
1,709
PDS (discretionary) (1)
37
41
Dispensing Costs
865
875
907
907
918
GOS
266
304
310
312
304

Total HCFHS
38,949
41,275
43,898
45,609
48,464

Footnotes:

1.  Personal Medical Services (PMS) and Personal Dental Services (PDS) schemes are Primary Care Act pilots designed to test locally-managed approaches to the delivery of primary care. PDS and PMS expenditure figures exclude any related capital investment by NHS trusts; PDS expenditure figures are also gross of patient charge income.

2.  FHS figures are on a cash basis for the years 1998-99 to 2001-02, wheras 2002-03 is on a resource basis.

  3.1.4  Could the Department give an account of the funding streams for the General Medical Services budget and provide a trend analysis? [3.1.4]

  1.  The two funding streams that make up the GMS budget are the discretionary—(cash-limited) and non-discretionary (non cash-limited) budgets. Table 3.1.4 gives a trend analysis.

Table 3.1.4

TREND ANALYSIS OF FUNDING STREAMS OF THE GMS BUDGET


£m
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03

GMS Non-discretionary
1,902
1,965
2,073
2,198
2,243
2,451
2,510
2,288
2,068
GMS Discretionary
723
754
800
835
878
897
940
857
840
PMS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
37
84
174
569
1,152
Total GMS
2,625
2,719
2,873
3,033
3,158
3,432
3,624
3,714
4,060
Including PMS spend
Percentage change total spend year on year
3.58%
5.66%
5.57%
4.12%
8.68%
5.59%
2.48%
9.32%


  Source: GMS discretionary and non-discretionary financial returns from the former 90 Family Health Service Authorities (up to 1995-2006)

1.  Up to 2000-01 data is from the 95 England Health Authorities. For 2001-02 PCTs were introduced but were reporting only on GMS discretionary expenditure.

2.  For 2002-03 spend is based on combined 28 SHA Qtr 1-2 and Qtr 3-4 303 PCT spend, owing to PCTs not having non-discretionary banking rights until September 2003.

3.  PMS Pilots funding covers wave 1,2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a and 4b funding.

4.  PMS spend includes both local transfers from the Unified budget discretionary amounts and GMS non-discretionary transfers.

5.  The discretionary and non-discretionary GMS figures reflect the growth over the period in GP and practice staff numbers, and the rise in pay and expenses.

6.  Please note that all figures up to 2001-02 are based on cash spend. Due to changes in accounting regulations figures for 2002-03 are resource based.

  2.  GMS GPs as a whole receive an average level of pay per GP plus reimbursement of all expenses. Some of these expenses are reimbursed directly in whole or part. Of these direct reimbursements, some eg a proportion of staff, premises and IT costs are met from discretionary spending; pay and remaining expenses are delivered through non-discretionary spend. Actual expenditure each year may deliver more or less than the profession's entitlement to pay or expenses. This outcome can only be finalised when a firm estimate of GMS expenses is available some two to three years after year-end. Over or underpayments are then normally corrected in subsequent years.

  3.  PCT, discretionary expenditure on reimbursing GMS GPs' practice staff, premises and IM & T expenses is protected by "GMS expenditure floors" which were introduced in 1998-99 and requires each PCT to deliver year-on-year increases in GMS discretionary spend which are at least in line with GDP.

  4.  All elements of a PMS Pilot's allocation are funded by transfers of money from the national GMS non-discretionary budget and a PCT's unified budget.

  5.  Please note that GMS Discretionary and Non-Discretionary data lines are taken from the latest 2002-03 Departmental report. All spend up to 2001-02 is cash based. Due to changes in Government accounting regulations, spend from and including 2002-03 onwards will be on a resource (I & E) basis.

3.2  Inflation

  3.2.1  Could the Department give an explanation as to the level of funding set aside for inflation in 2004-05? In particular, can it give the average pay awards to each (subjective) staff group and the inflation assumptions for non pay including capital charges? [3.2.1]

HEALTH AUTHORITY INFLATION

  1.  NHS funding will rise by £5.6 billion in 2004-05—equivalent to 6.3% real terms growth. This overall allocation will help the NHS to meet healthcare pressures reflected in local Delivery Plans. However, it is for health economies, including strategic health authorities in partnership with NHS Trusts, Primary Care Trusts and local authorities to determine how best to use their funds to meet national and local priorities for improving health and modernising services. The significant additional resources available will aid them in this process.

  2.  2004-05 is, for the majority of NHS trusts a preparatory year for the introduction, on 1 April 2005, of Payment by Results with some Foundation Trusts opting for early implementation from 1 April 2004. The national price tariff underpinning the system is also adjusted annually for unavoidable cost pressures. The uplift is based on the same assumptions that underpin the revenue allocations to PCTs. The uplift includes:

    —  increases in the cost of drugs and other technology, including increases arising from NICE guidance;

    —  price inflation for goods and services;

    —  the impact of one-off events (such as change to National Insurance contributions);

    —  an overall 1% efficiency gain assumption; and

    —  a reduction in the return on capital employed by providers from 6% to 3.5%.

  For 2004-05 the total uplift for the national tariff is 7.9%.

Pay

  3.  The table below shows the settlements awarded to those staff whose pay arrangements are determined by the Review Bodies.

Table 3.2.1

REVIEW BODY PAY SETTLEMENTS 2004


Group
Settlement

Nursing and Midwifery
3.225%
Allied Health Professionals
3.225%
Consultants on the new contract
3.225%
Consultants on the old contract
2.5%
Juniors
2.7%
NCCGs
2.7%
FHS doctors
3.225%


Prices

  4.  The GDP deflator is used as a proxy for underlying non-pay inflation in the NHS. This needs to be adjusted for assumptions about the level of procurement and other efficiency savings that the NHS is expected to make.

Capital Charges

  5.  At national level, the cost of capital charges paid by the NHS is a circular flow of funds. The total of the capital charges estimates made by NHS Trusts forms part of the total cash resources available through Health Authority allocations.

  6.  Indices for land, buildings and equipment are produced for the Department each year by the Valuation Office, in order that the NHS may calculate capital charges in advance of the financial year.

  7.  The aggregate index used to uplift capital charges from 2002-03 to 2003-04 levels was 8.7%. The index is not yet available for 2003-04 to 2004-05.

  3.2.2  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the components of the health specific inflation indices for revenue spending on HCHS and Family Health Services respectively, together with capital spending on HCHS? The tables for the HCHS should show separate inflation indices for Review Body staff and non-Review Body staff pay, and whatever other breakdowns of staff are available. [3.2.2]

HCHS PAY AND PRICES INFLATION

Prices

  1.  Increases in the cost of goods and services, ie the non-pay components of inflation are measured by the Health Service Cost Index (HSCI). The HSCI weights together price increases for a broad range of items used by the health service—for example, drugs, medical equipment, fuel, telephone charges—using weights derived from expenditure on these various goods and services reported in financial returns.

Pay

Table 3.2.2(a)

INFLATION FOR SPECIFIC ITEMS OF HCHS REVENUE EXPENDITURE


2001-02
2002-03
2003-04

%
%
%
Total staff pay
8.3
5.0
n/a
Review Body staff
9.4
5.1
n/a
Non-Review Body staff
6.0
4.8
n/a
Prices
0.1
1.3
2.5
HCHS Total
5.1
3.6
n/a

NB: Staff pay figures shown for 2001-02 appear artificially high by the inclusion of 2% pension increases in employers contributions from 1 April 2001.

FHS Inflation

  3.  The components of the Family Health Service (FHS) inflation index are set out in Table 3.2.2(b). For General Medical Service (GMS) and General Dental Service (GDS), service specific inflation is calculated as the increase year on year in the average cost per practitioner. For both services the changes in unit costs include volume and quality effects (eg increase practice staff numbers or the provision of a changing range of services) as well as pure price effects. For the Pharmaceutical Service (PhS) and General Ophthalmic Service (GOS), service inflation is assumed equal to movements in the GDP deflator. GMS cash limited expenditure has not been included in the calculations. The FHS inflation index may be affected by a number of changes in primary care services, including the provision of drug costs in unified budget, and will need to be reviewed in the future.

Table 3.2.2(b)

COMPONENTS OF THE FHS INFLATION INDEX


2000-01
2001-02
2002-03

%
%
%
GMS
3.7
0.3
0.8
GDS
4.0
3.6
5.0
PhS
1.9
2.6
3.4
GOS
1.9
2.6
3.4
FHS Total
2.7
2.2
3.1

Footnote:

1.  The GMS figures do not include PMS GPs.

  4.  For 2003-04 to 2005-06 an uplift for unavoidable cost pressure on the Payment by Results national tariff has also been calculated. The tariff includes such areas as pay, prices and capital charges. For 2003-04 the national tariff has been calculated to be 3.3%. This is substantially lower than the 2004-05 tariff uplift figure due to a change in the discount rate which reduced the tariff by nearly 2%.

  5.  The uplift includes:

    —  the expected impact on pay, including Agenda for Change, consultant contract, European Working Time Directive and the change in employers' pension contributions;

    —  increases in the cost of drugs and other technology, including increases arising from NICE guidance;

    —  price inflation for goods and services;

    —  the impact of one-off events (such as change to National Insurance contributions);

    —  an overall 1% efficiency gain assumption; and

    —  a reduction in the return on capital employed by providers from 6% to 3.5%.

  3.2.3  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the increases in expenditure on the NHS in cash terms, real terms (GDP deflator) and real terms (NHS deflator)? [3.2.3]

  1.  Between 1993-94 and 2002-03, the latest year for which NHS specific indices are available, net NHS expenditure has increased by:

    91.7% in cash terms;

    49.7% in real terms adjusted by the GDP deflator; and

    36.1% after accounting for NHS specific inflation.

  2.  Between 2003-04 and 2005-06, net NHS resources increase by:

    31.9% in cash terms; and

    22.3% in real terms adjusted by the GDP deflator.

Table 3.2.3

CHANGE IN NET NHS EXPENDITURE 1993-94 TO 2005-06


Net NHS expenditure(3)
£m
Percentage Change
%
Real terms
change
(1)
%
Change after
adjusting for NHS specific inflation
(2)
%

Cash
1993-94
Outturn
28,942
1994-95
Outturn
30,590
5.7
4.2
3.0
1995-96
Outturn
31,985
4.6
1.6
0.8
1996-97
Outturn
32,997
3.2
-0.2
0.3
1997-98
Outturn
34,664
5.1
2.4
2.9
1998-99
Outturn
36,608
5.6
2.7
1.6
1999-2000
Outturn
39,881
8.9
6.6
4.1
Stage 1 Resource Basis
1999-2000
Outturn
40,201
2000-01
Outturn
43,932
9.3
8.0
5.0
2001-02
Outturn
49,021
11.6
8.8
6.5
2002-03
Outturn
54,042
10.2
6.7
6.5
Stage 2 Resource Basis
2002-03
Estimated outturn
55,724
2003-04(4)
Plan
63,667
14.3
11.2
2004-05
Plan
69,231
8.7
6.3
2005-06
Plan
76,144
10.0
7.3


Footnotes:

1.  Change after adjusting for the GDP deflator (30 June 2004).

2.  NHS specific inflation index is available of the period up to 2002-03.

3.  NHS Expenditure Figures for the period 1999-2000 to 2005-06 are consistent with Table 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b.

4.  NHS expenditure figures for 2002-03 to 2005-06 have been adjusted for classification changes by HMT. As a result, growth in NHS expenditure in 2003-04 is distorted. Once these are adjusted for, real terms growth in NHS expenditure in 2003-04 is 7.3%.

  3.2.4  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in relation to the construction of the NHS inflation index from main sub-indices of pay and other factor costs since 1992, and comment on the assumptions underlying this construct? Would the Department provide the weights used for each sub-index, for each year? [3.2.4]

  1.  The NHS inflation is constructed using five sub-indices. These are:

        HCHS pay index: This measures the change in average paybill per head of those employed within the HCHS;

        HCHS price inflation: This measures the change in the price of goods and services supplied to the HCHS, it is measured by the Health Service Cost Index;

        HCHS Capital Inflation Index: This reflects the changes in prices experienced in HCHS capital projects and is calculated using a mixture of the construction price index and the GDP deflator;

        FHS Index: This is produced using different assumptions for each of the main groups. For general medical services and general dental services, inflation is calculated as the increase in the average cost per practitioner. For both services, the change in unit costs includes volume and quality effects as well as pure price effects. For pharmaceutical services and general ophthalmic services, service inflation is assumed equal to movements in the GDP deflator;

        The "other" Index: This comprises of the revenue and capital expenditure on Central Health Miscellaneous Services (CHMS) and Departmental Administration (including the Medicines Control Agency and NHS Estates). The GDP deflator is used in the absence of service specific deflators.


HCHS
HCHS
HCHS
NHS

Year
Pay
Prices
Capital
FHS
Other
Total
1992-93
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1993-94
104.2
101.4
104.4
100.6
102.5
102.7
1994-95
107.7
102.3
112.9
102.9
103.8
105.4
1995-96
112.5
105.6
118.0
105.5
106.8
109.3
1996-97
116.2
107.2
119.7
109.0
110.2
112.4
1997-98
119.1
107.6
124.7
112.2
113.6
114.8
1998-99
124.9
110.3
128.5
115.6
116.7
119.3
1999-2000
133.5
111.6
132.1
120.3
119.5
124.8
2000-01
142.7
111.2
139.7
123.6
122.2
129.9
2001-02
154.5
111.3
148.8
126.2
125.3
136.1
2002-03
162.3
112.8
155.4
130.1
129.5
140.8


  2.  The weights attached to each of the elements for each of the years are shown in the table below.


HCHS
HCHS
HCHS
NHS

Year
Pay
Prices
Capital
FHS
Other
Total
1992-93
49%
21%
6%
21%
3%
100%
1993-94
49%
21%
5%
22%
3%
100%
1994-95
49%
21%
6%
22%
3%
100%
1995-96
49%
21%
5%
22%
3%
100%
1996-97
50%
21%
4%
23%
2%
100%
1997-98
47%
25%
3%
23%
2%
100%
1998-99
47%
25%
3%
22%
2%
100%
1999-2000
46%
24%
3%
24%
2%
100%
2000-01
46%
22%
4%
26%
2%
100%
2001-02
47%
21%
4%
26%
2%
100%
2002-03
48%
32%
4%
14%
2%
100%


  3.  The weights attached to each of the elements have changed considerably between this year and last year. This is because between years there has been an increase in the number of PCTs from 164 to 304. PCTs have progressively taken over the commissioning of healthcare from health authorities but also the provision of some services from NHS trusts. The revenue expenditure for the provider function cannot be accurately eliminated from the total revenue expenditure hence year on year increases in total revenue expenditure are not comparable.

3.3  Hospital and Community Health Services Allocations and Distance from Targets

  3.3.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in table 3.3.1 in response to last year's questionnaire on expenditure covering HCHS and FHS for each SHA area together with estimates of distances from target needs based expenditure? [3.3.1]

  1.  The information requested is provided in Table 3.3.1. The information is unchanged from that provided in response to last year's questionnaire, as the allocations announced in December 2002 cover the period 2003-04 to 2005-06.

  2.  The table aggregates 2003-04 to 2005-06 PCT allocations and distances from target at SHA level. These unified allocations cover hospital and community health services (HCHS), prescribing (the drugs bill), general medical services discretionary (general practice infrastucture) and HIV/AIDS.

  3.  For 2003-04 to 2005-06 the weighted capitation formula which informs resource allocation also has a general medical services non-discretionary component. This allows the cash limited unified allocations to take account of the distribution of GMS non- discretionary expenditure.

  4.  GMS non-cash limited baselines and targets are added to unified allocations baselines and targets to form composite baselines and targets. Composite distances from target are derived to inform the allocation of the extra resources for unified allocations. This is not used to allocate GMS non-discretionary funding which remains non-cash limited.

  5.  The Department does not make allocations for FHS non-discretionary expenditure. This expenditure is non-cash limited and PCTs draw down funding from the Department as required to meet their expenditure. Apart from the GMS non-discretionary formula referred to above there are no formulas to calculate target shares of FHS non-discretionary expenditure.

  6.  Following the introduction of a new contract for GMS, the funding for GMS is now cash-limited and the Department intends to include the majority of GMS and PMS funding in PCT allocations from 2006-07.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 February 2005