Select Committee on Health Memoranda


3.  NHS Resources and Activity (continued)

3.6  EXPENDITURE ON PRESCRIBING

3.6.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in table 3.6.1 response to last year's questionnaire regarding total NHS expenditure on pharmaceuticals for the past four years, including a breakdown by sector and by generic/branded drugs. [3.6.1]

  1.  Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances in England in 2002-03 was £8,355 million. £6,342 million of this total relates to prescriptions dispensed in the community and £2,013 million relates to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting. In 2003-04 the total spent on prescriptions dispensed in the community was £6,946 (please note this is a provisional figure and has yet to be finalised).

  2.  In cash terms, total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community in England in 2003-04 was £6,799 million (please note this is a provisional figure and has yet to be finalised). Cash figures for HCHS 2004-03 expenditure are not available.

  3.  Historical NHS Drug Bill expenditure figures, broken down by sector, for the financial years 2000-01 to 2003-04 is provided in the table below:


Year
(Cash)
Total NHS net expenditure relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community

(£m)
Total NHS net expenditure relating to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting (£m)
Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances

(£m)

2000-01
5,161
N/A
N/A
2001-02
5,552
N/A
N/A
2002-03
6,209
N/A
N/A
2003-04
6,799
N/A
N/A

Year (Resource)
Total NHS net expenditure relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community

(£m)
Total NHS net expenditure relating to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting (£m)
Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances

(£m)

2001-02
5,707
1,723
7,430
2002-03
6,342
2,013
8,355
2003-04
6,946
N/A
N/A


  4.  For prescriptions dispensed in the community in England, a breakdown between branded medicines, generic medicines, dressings and listed appliances for the financial years 1993-94 to 2003-04 is provided in Table 3.6.1. The table shows both the cost (expressed in terms of net ingredient cost) and the volume (number of prescription items) for each category. In 2003-04, branded drugs dispensed represent about 72% of the total net ingredient cost (inc. the cost of dressings and appliances). In 2003-04, the share of prescription items written generically was 76%, and the share of prescription items dispensed generically was 55%.

Table 3.6.1

NUMBER AND NET INGREDIENT COST OF GENERIC AND PROPRIETARY PRESCRIPTION ITEMS DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY 1993-94 TO 2003-04


England
Drugs dispensed generically
Drugs dispensed as proprietary
Dressings and Appliance

NIC
Prescription items
NIC
Prescription items
NIC
Prescription items
Financial Year
(£m)
(m)
(£m)
(m)
(£m)
(m)
1993-94
351
169
2,680
264
190
14
1994-95
402
186
2,881
262
205
14
1995-96
457
201
3,066
259
216
15
1996-97
516
214
3,328
258
228
15
1997-98
651
230
3,574
260
240
15
1998-99
703
240
3,845
261
251
15
1999-2000
1,049
254
4,116
265
270
15
2000-01
1,077
284
4,283
261
291
16
2001-02
1,079
300
4,886
275
316
17
2002-03
1,397
325
5,275
282
346
17
2003-04
1,799
359
5,488
282
378
18

Notes:

1.  Source: PCA, PPA, England. Figures are for prescription items dispensed by chemists and appliance contractors and dispensing doctors including items personally administered in England, for financial years April to March. Note that in addition to prescriptions written by GPs in England, this includes those written by nurses, dentists, hospital doctors, (and, up to March 1994, armed services doctors and dentists) provided they were dispensed in the community. Also included are prescriptions written in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man but dispensed in England. The data do not cover drugs dispensed in hospital or private prescriptions. Please note data for 2001-02 in the previous HSC was incorrect due to errors in Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA). The data has now been revised

2.  The net ingredient cost (NIC) is the basic cost of a drug. This cost does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charge income. All figures are expressed at outturn prices.

3.  Generic dispensing covers drugs that are prescribed and available generically and the dispenser is reimbursed at the Drug Tariff or generic price. It is possible in some circumstances for a branded drug or parallel import to be dispensed against the prescription.

4.  The Department collects data on secondary care prescribing through NHS Trust and Health Authority financial returns. On an annual basis, these high level aggregate returns enable it to monitor the pressure faced by local NHS organisations and the aggregate cost to the NHS as a whole. More detailed information is available to Trusts at a local level from hospital pharmacy IT systems. This is primarily used to monitor local spending on pharmaceuticals together with adherence to local policies aimed at ensuring the cost effective use of medicines.

5.  "Pharmacy in the Future", the modernisation programme for pharmacy services in England made a commitment to implement a self-assessment tool for medicines management in NHS hospitals. The tool was developed by the Office of the Chief Pharmacist, at the Department of Health, with the support of the Regional Directors of Performance Management and Public Health and Regional Pharmaceutical Advisers. It was introduced to NHS Trust hospitals in England through a roll-out programme managed by the Regional Office (RO) network.

6.  The self-assessment tool recognised that achieving clinical and cost-effective medicines use is an organisation-wide issue on which managers, prescribers and pharmacists need to work together. The self-assessment tool provided an opportunity for hospitals to examine their arrangements ahead of the Audit Commission's review of medicines management in Spring 2001.

7.  Regional Offices organised meetings with Trusts in Autumn 2001 to ensure action plans were in place to improve performance.

8.  The Audit Commission published their report "A Spoonful of Sugar" in December 2001. The report complements the Department's medicines management performance framework.

9.  Work is in hand to develop the next stage of the framework. The next wave will focus on implementation of action plans and the greater use of automation and IT. The central aim is to ensure that clinicians, pharmacists and financial planners work more closely together across local health economies.

  3.6.2  Could the Department please update the information provided in response to last year's questionnaire in Table 3.6.4 regarding the likely costs of NICE recommendations for the current financial year? [3.6.2]

Table 3.6.2

ESTIMATED COSTS OF NICE GUIDANCE (As at 13 August 2004)


Title of guidance
Date of issue
Estimated
full-year costs
(England, £m)
Comment
Completed appraisals

1Wisdom teeth
March 2000
-4.7
2Hip replacement
April 2000
-7.6
3Taxanes for ovarian cancer
May 2000
6.6
4Coronary artery stents
May 2000
n/a
5Liquid based cytology
June 2000
n/a
6Taxanes for breast cancer
June 2000
15.1
7Proton Pump Inhibitors
July 2000
-42.5
8Hearing aids
July 2000
n/a
9Rosiglitazone for Type II Diabetes
August 2000
0
Original estimate was 14.5, but this was in effect superseded by the later estimate for the two glitazones together in the pioglitazone appraisal.
10Inhaler systems for under 5s
August 2000
n/a
11Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
September 2000
26
This assumes an offset of £15-20 million to gross costs of £45 million
12Glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitors
September 2000
28.6
13Ritalin for ADHD
October 2000
19.8
NICE made separate estimates of the year 1 drug and associated running costs, and of the cost of initial assessment of potentially eligible patients."
14Ribivirin and interferon alpha for Hepatitis C
October 2000
17.3
£55 million spread over three years to clear the prevalent cases, then reducing to £5 million pa."
15Zanamivir for influenza
November 2000
6.6
16Autologous cartilage transplantation in knee joints
December 2000
n/a
17Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
January 2001
n/a
18Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia
December 2000
n/a
19Donepezil, rivastigmine and glantamine for Alzheimer's
January 2001
39.7
This is the long-run annual cost—NICE expected a slow build-up over several years
20Riluzole for motor neurone disease
January 2001
4.7
21Pioglitazone for Type II diabetes
March 2001
-11.3
See comment on rosiglitazone above.
22Orlistat for obesity
March 2001
9
£6 million for drug costs and
£3-4 million for overheads
23Temozolomide for brain cancer
April 2001
0.9
24Difficult to heal surgical wounds
April 2001
n/a
25Gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer
May 2001
1.8
264 drugs for non-small cell lung cancer
June 2001
9
These are the short-run costs—NICE comment that take-up may increase in the longer term.
27Cox II for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
July 2001
23.6
28Topotecan for advanced ovarian cancer
August 2001
6.6
29Fludarabine for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
September 2001
0
Estimated to be broadly cost neutral—no detailed costings given.
30Taxanes for breast cancer—review
September 2001
0
Earlier guidance unchanged
31Sibutramine for obesity in adults
October 2001
18.1
Year 3 figure
32Beta interferon and glatiramer for MS
January 2002
n/a
333 drugs for advanced colorectal cancer
March 2002
35.3
NICE estimate £21 million for 1st line and £20 million for 2nd line use. They indicate that costs in 2nd line use could be "considerably lower", but do not give a lower bound. The £33 million is an MPI estimate.
34Trastuzumab for advanced breast cancer
March 2002
16
35Etanercept for juvenile arthritis
March 2002
2.8
36Etanercept and infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis
March 2002
59
37Rituximab—non-Hodkin's lymphoma
March 2002
1.2
NICE do not attempt a quantative estimate, but information in the guidance suggests a figure of around £1.2 million.
38Inhaler Systems for children 5-15 years
March 2002
0.9
39Nicotine replacement therapy and Zyban
March 2002
38.7
40Infliximab for Crohn's disease
May 2002
1.6
NICE estimated £2.5 million for the first year costs. They expected lower costs in subsequent years but did not quantify.

41Routine anti-D prophylaxis
May 2002
3.8
42Human growth hormone in children
May 2002
34.7
Upper bound is NICE estimate, lower bound based on NICE with additional assumption by MPI.
43Atypical antipsychotics
June 2002
104.8
44Metal on metal hip resurfacing
June 2002
1.9
NICE say cost is more likely to be at lower end of range.
45Caelyx for advanced ovarian cancer
July 2002
2.9
46Surgery for the morbidly obese
July 2002
12.7
This is long-run cost—NICE suggest £1.7 million in year 1.
47Review of guidance for acute coronary syndromes (Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor)
September 2002
0
Replacement of the September 2000 guidance with this revised guidance is not expected to increase costs to the NHS
48Home verses hospital haemodialysis
September 2002
n/a
49Ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters
September 2002
0.9
200,000 procedures x "less than £10" per procedure. Number of additional machines @ £7-15K not quantified.
50Imatinib for chronic myeloid leukaemia
October 2002
13
Estimated increase in the first year is between £11.8 million and £15.8 million for England and Wales.
51Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy
October 2002
0
Further research recommended.
52Early thrombolysis treatment for myocardial infarction
October 2002
15.6
Net costs appear to be in the ranged £14-£19 million
53Long acting insulin analogues for diabetes
December 2002
7.6
Estimate on the high side—based on all potentially eligible patients switching to this treatment—actual costs will be proportionately less depending on uptake
54Vinorelbine for breast cancer
December 2002
n/a
55Review of paclitaxel for ovarian cancer
January 2003
0
Unlikely that additional costs to the NHS will result from this review.
56Tension free vaginal tape
February 2003
n/a
Further research recommended.
57Insulin pump therapy for diabetes
February 2003
3.8
NICE suggest costs will be at the bottom end of the range
58Zanamivir (review), amantadine and oseltamivir for influenza
February 2003
0
Cost impact depends on the severity of an outbreak in any given year. No anticipated increase over previous estimated figures—as savings/pressures balance out between the three drugs.
59Electroconvulsive therapy
April 2003
n/a
Guidance recommends the use of ECT only in certain restricted circumstances.
60Patient education models for diabetes
April 2003
10.3
160 centres for England each with running costs of £64,500 pa =10.3 million
61Capecitabine and tegafur uracil for colorectal cancer
May 2003
-11.20
Assumes 3,500 each use capecitabine or tegafur uracil in preference to existing treatment options
62Capecitabine for breast cancer
May 2003
-1.1
Saving is for combination capecitabine/docetaxel relative to docetaxel monotherapy
63Glitazones for type 2 diabetes (review)
3.4
Revision to previous guidance reduces by about 30% the previous estimated saving of £12 million pa.
64Human Growth Hormone in adults
0
cost saving—but no figures estimated
65Rituximab for aggressive non Hodgkin's lymphoma
12.4
NICE say incidence is rising by 4% pa and quote an upper limit of £27.3 for 2007 but basis is not clear.
66Olanzapine and valporate semisodium for bipolar 1 disorder
0
Unlikely to be net costs or savings
67Oseltamivir and amantidine for prophylaxis of flu
9.4
Costs will vary with severity of influenza outbreak
68PDT for macular degeneration
19.5
69Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical screening
10.20
Running costs are likely to be similar with some possible (unquantified) time savings in diagnosis. Running costs are likely to be similar to the start-up costs.
70Use of imatanib for chronic myeloid leukaemia
17
Steady-state (year 5) costs.
71Use of coronary artery stents
6.2
This is the net cost of using drug-eluting stents vs bare metal stents. NICE estimate a possible £4 million offsetting saving from reducing the restenosis rate.
72Rheumatoid arthritis—anakinra
0
73Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction
25.5
74Pre-hospital initiation of fluid replacement therapy in trauma
0
75Hepatitis C—pegylated interferons, ribavarin and alfa interferon
9.9
76Newer drugs for epilepsy in adults
0
cost neutral
77Newer hypnotic drugs for insomnia
0
cost saving—but no figures estimated
78Fluid-filled thermal balloon and microwave endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding
-14.2
NICE quote a range of -£29 to -£32 million. However it is unlikely that such savings would be realised. Assume half this figure.
79Newer drugs for epilepsy in children
0
cost neutral

Total costs for all guidance to date
621.8

Notes:

1.  All estimates are based on figures published in NICE's appraisal guidance.

2.  Where the NICE estimate is given as a range, a central value (the mid-point of the range) is taken.

3.  NICE estimates are given on an England and Wales basis. Where they are still on that basis (in the "comments" column) they are specified. To derive the financial estimate, they have been pro-rated to an England basis using appropriate population factors (Source: ONS and NICE guidance).

  1.  The information requested is shown in Table 3.6.2 . It is as at August 2004.

  2.  The estimated full-year costs of all NICE appraisal guidance issued so far amount to some £621.8 million.

  3.  In some cases the financial impact on the NHS may build up gradually over a number of years, for instance where infrastructure changes are needed to put the recommendations into full effect.

  4.  In addition, there will be some costs arising out of appraisals due to be completed during the current year.

  3.6.3  How much is spent annually by the Department on promoting the dissemination of drug prescribing information from independent sources (eg drug bulletins)?

  1.  The Department of Health spends around £4.5 million annually on promoting the dissemination of drug prescribing information from independent sources. This funding covers the purchase for the NHS of the British National Formulary (BNF), the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin (BNF) and the MeReC Bulletin (funded by the Department of Health through the National Institute for Clinical Excellence).

  3.6.4  How much is spent annually by the Department on investigating the prevalence, cost and reduction of adverse drug effects, including costs associated with related actions for clinical negligence?

  1.  In 2003-04 £8.8 million was spent on post-marketing surveillance activities within the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in monitoring the prevalence of adverse drug effects and in working to reduce adverse drug effects through the processes pharmacovigilance, advertising and product information control.

  2.  The information requested in the second part of this question is provided in the attached table.

PAYMENTS MADE FROM THE CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE SCHEME FOR TRUSTS (CNST) FOR MEDICATION ERRORS


Payments (£)

Payment Year
Damages
Defence Costs
Claimant Costs
Grand Total
1995-96
1,000
3,304
646
4,950
1996-97
56,607
3,591
7,541
67,740
1997-98
40,867
14,216
29,607
84,690
1998-99
213,842
73,581
75,838
363,262
1999-2000
400,038
114,492
156,822
671,352
2000-01
561,506
309,196
168,676
1,039,377
2001-02
4,716,635
1,476,257
913,274
7,106,166
2002-03
3,116,835
629,727
702,304
4,448,866


  3.6.5  How much is spent annually by the Department on the deployment of post-marketing surveillance systems, education and training programmes and other measures intended to improve standards of drug prescribing and reduce levels of drug injury?

  1.  In 2003-04 £12.4 million was spent on the following post-marketing surveillance activities within the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency: pharmacovigilance, advertising and product information control, medicines testing, intelligence, borderline, standards and enforcement work.

  3.6.6  We have been informed that synthetic "human" insulin is currently the automatic first line treatment for people with insulin-requiring diabetes, and that synthetic insulin analogues are now beginning to take over from synthetic "human" insulin as a first line treatment. Could the Department provide information on the amount that is spent annually on different types of insulin, indicating what national policy informs decision-making on NHS use of different types of insulin?

  1.  Table 3.6.6 gives information on the prescribing levels of the different types of Insulin that were dispensed in the community in England from 1994 to 2003.

Table 3.6.6

NUMBER OF PRESCRIPTION ITEMS (thousands) OF INSULINS THAT WERE DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY IN ENGLAND. 1994 to 2003



thousands
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

Animal Insulin
354.6
327.2
306.9
288.9
280.6
271.8
250.1
232.2
208.7
181.1
Bovine
60.3
51.9
44.4
39.1
37.1
35.3
32.0
29.5
25.6
21.8
Porcine
294.3
275.3
262.4
249.8
243.5
236.5
218.1
202.7
183.0
159.2


Human Insulin
1,393.0
1,546.6
1,723.2
1,902.9
2,153.4
2,450.5
2,701.5
3,003.9
3,274.7
3,654.3
Synthetic Human Insulin
1,393.0
1,546.6
1,717.8
1,869.4
2,081.7
2,326.2
2,513.8
2,727.5
2,879.2
2,819.2
Synthetic Insulin Analogues
0.0
0.0
5.4
33.5
71.7
124.3
187.7
276.5
395.5
835.1
All Insulins
1,747.5
1,873.7
2,030.1
2,191.8
2,434.0
2,722.3
2,951.6
3,236.1
3,483.4
3,835.4


NET INGREDIENT COST (£ thousands) OF INSULINS THAT WERE DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY IN ENGLAND. 1994 to 2003



£ thousands

1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Animal Insulin
9,750.0
9,311.2
9,104.6
8,797.6
8,698.8
8,406.6
7,072.9
6,923.3
6,787.5
5,933.4
Bovine
2,145.5
2,249.1
2,360.2
2,103.3
2,114.7
2,041.4
1,817.3
1,676.1
1,473.9
1,284.7
Porcine
7,604.4
7,062.1
6,744.4
6,694.3
6,584.0
6,365.2
5,255.6
5,247.3
5,313.7
4,648.7


Human Insulin
37,836.6
43,301.2
49,305.2
59,177.7
71,142.6
83,237.5
93,744.6
115,735.9
136,096.0
162,613.8
Synthetic Human Insulin
37,836.6
43,301.2
49,112.9
57,966.7
68,473.2
78,211.6
85,409.3
102,480.0
116,594.0
119,945.7
Synthetic Insulin Analogues
0.0
0.0
192.3
1,211.0
2,669.4
5,025.9
8,335.3
13,256.0
19,502.0
42,668.1
All Insulins
47,586.6
52,612.4
58,409.8
67,975.3
79,841.3
91,644.1
100,817.5
122,659.3
142,883.6
168,547.2


AVERAGE NET INGREDIENT COST PER ITEM (£) OF INSULINS THAT WERE DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY IN ENGLAND. 1994 to 2003



£s
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

Animal Insulin
27.5
28.5
29.7
30.5
31.0
30.9
28.3
29.8
32.5
32.8
Bovine
35.6
43.3
53.1
53.8
57.0
57.9
56.8
56.9
57.5
58.8
Porcine
25.8
25.7
25.7
26.8
27.0
26.9
24.1
25.9
29.0
29.2


Human Insulin
27.2
28.0
28.6
31.1
33.0
34.0
34.7
38.5
41.6
44.5
Synthetic Human Insulin
27.2
28.0
28.6
31.0
32.9
33.6
34.0
37.6
40.5
42.5
Synthetic Insulin Analogues
35.5
36.1
37.2
40.4
44.4
48.0
49.3
51.1


All Insulins
27.2
28.1
28.8
31.0
32.8
33.7
34.2
37.9
41.0
43.9

Notes:

1.  The data is from the Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA) system which covers all prescription items that are dispensed in the community in England. This does not include drugs dispensed in hospitals or private prescriptions.

2.  Insulins are those defined in the British National Formulary (BNF) paragraph 6.1.1, "Insulins. Insulin drugs have been grouped into Animal (Bovine and Porcine) and Human insulin (Synthetic human insulin and Synthetic Insulin Analogues) in line with the British National Formulary (BNF)

3.  Doctors write prescriptions on a prescription form. Each single item written on the form is counted as a prescription item.

4.  The net ingredient cost refers to the cost (which the dispenser is reimbursed) of the drug before discounts and does not include any dispensing costs or fees. It does not include any adjustment for income obtained where a prescription charge is paid at the time the prescription is dispensed or where the patient has purchased a pre-payment certificate.


ALL INSULINS

  2.  In 2003, 3.9 million prescription items of all Insulins were dispensed in the community in England with a net ingredient cost of £168.5 million. Human Insulin (synthetic human insulin and synthetic insulin analogues) accounted for the majority (96%) of all Insulin dispensed in the community. Animal insulin accounted for 4% of the cost of all insulins dispensed in the community.

HUMAN INSULIN

  3.  There are two forms of human insulin; Synthetic human insulin and synthetic insulin analogues. According to the British National Formulary (BNF), Synthetic insulin analogues include Insulin Aspart, Insulin Lispro and Insulin Glargine. The number of prescription items of all human insulins dispensed in the community has been increasing by around 10% a year since 1994.

  4.  Prescribing levels of the synthetic insulin analogues have been increasing since they were first dispensed in the community in England in 1996. Between 2002 and 2003 the number of prescription items of all human insulins increased from 3.3 million to 3.7 million; an increase of 12%. The number of prescription items of synthetic insulin analogues more than doubled over the same time period whereas the number of items of synthetic human insulins decreased by 2%. The increase in the prescribing of the analogues suggests that they are beginning to be prescribed more than the synthetic human insulins. In 2003 synthetic insulin analogues accounted for around a quarter of the items (23%) and cost (26%) of all human insulins dispensed in the community in England compared to only 12% of the total items and 14% of the net ingredient cost of all human insulins dispensed in the community in England in 2002.

  5.  Due to the increased prescribing of synthetic insulin analogues, the net ingredient cost of all human insulins has been increasing faster than the number of prescription items since the analogues are on average around £10 more expensive per prescription item than the synthetic human insulins. In 2003, the net ingredient cost of all human insulins dispensed in the community was £162.6 million, an increase of 19% on 2002. The net ingredient cost of the synthetic human insulins increased from £116.6 million to £119.9 million (an increase of 3%) over the same period whereas the cost of synthetic insulin analogues increased from £19.5 million to £42.7 million (an increase of 119%).

Insulin Prescribing Policy

  6.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidance on the use of long acting insulin analogues for the treatment of diabetes—insulin glargine. (NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No 53 (2002) Guidance on the use of long acting insulin analogues for the treatment of diabetes—insulin glargine.)

  7.  The guidance recommends insulin glargine as a treatment option for people with Type 1 diabetes. The guidance also recommends glargine as a treatment option for people with Type 2 diabetes who require insulin therapy, but only if they fall into one of the following categories:

    —  those who require assistance from a carer or healthcare professional to administer their insulin injections;

    —  those whose lifestyle is significantly restricted by recurrent symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes; and,

    —  those who would otherwise need twice-daily basal insulin injections in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug.

  8.  NICE have not carried out any further technology appraisals on either animal or human insulin.

  9.  Ultimately, all decisions about appropriate treatment regimes for people with diabetes rests entirely with the healthcare adviser, in consultation with the patient.

3.7  National Specialist Services

  3.7.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in Table 3.7.1 in response to last year's questionnaire? [3.7.1]

Total and Planned Expenditure

  1.  Table 3.7.1 shows the expenditure on each of the national specialist services in 2002-03 and 2003-04. It also shows the service agreement values for 2004-05.

  2.  The National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group (NSCAG) was established in 1996 to advise Ministers on the identification and funding of services where national commissioning was necessary for reasons of clinical effectiveness, equity of access, and/or economic viability. NSCAG superseded the Supra Regional Services Advisory Group.

Significant Changes

  3.  One new national service has been centrally funded from 1 April 2004:

Pancreas Transplantation

  4.  This procedure is of proven benefit to a small, defined group of people with Type 1 diabetes and end stage renal failure. It is usually carried out at the same time as a kidney transplant (known as simultaneous pancreas—kidney transplant or SPK). However, it can also be done as a stand-alone procedure in patients who have previously received a kidney graft (known as pancreas after kidney or PAK), or as a pancreas transplant alone (PTA) in someone who has never received a kidney.

  5.  An additional centre has been opened for the following service:

Secure Forensic Mental Health Services for Adolescents

  6.  NSCAG have commissioned a third national unit in the West Midlands. As part of the development of a full national service, inpatient services are also being developed in London and the South.

Table 3.7.1

SUPRA REGIONAL SERVICES AND CENTRALLY COMMISSIONED SERVICES 2002-03, 2003-04 AND 2004-05



Total Expenditure £'000
Service Agreement £`000

2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
ServiceNHS Provider Unit
Provider
Funding
Service
Funding
Provider
Funding
Service
Funding
Provider
Funding
Service
Funding
Adult Ventricular Assist DevicesPapworth Hospital, Cambridge, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, and Freeman Hospital, Newcastle
2,709
2,709
1,511
1,511
2,109
2,109
AmyloidosisRoyal Free Hospital, London
1,223
1,223
1,518
1,518
1,611
1,611
Bladder ExstrophyGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London
1,179
930 (1)
972
Manchester Children's Hospital
333
1,512
362
1,292
399
1,371
Mental Health Forensic Secure Service for Adolescents Birmingham Unit
647
4,302
4,726
Gardener Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne
3,346
3,513
3,817
Roycroft Unit, Manchester
3,664
7,657
3,867
11,682
4,234
West London Mental Health Trust
327
South London & Maudsley NHS Trust
993
Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust
100
14,197
Heart and Lung TransplantationGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London
2,476
2,721 (1)
2,962
Royal Brompton & Harefield, London
10,253
10,541
11,658
Northern General Hospital, Sheffield
2,034
1,600
1,171
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
5,951
6,410
7,079
Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester
3,138
3,250
3,683
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
4,112
4,336
4,639
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham
2,140
30,104
2,459
31,317
2,576
33,768
ChoriocarcinomaWeston Park Hospital, Sheffield
588
640
648
Charing Cross Hospital, London
1,285
1,873
1,361
2,001
1,401
2,049
Craniofacial SurgeryJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
1,568
1,759
1,799
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
1,558
1,460 (1)
1,641
Birmingham Children's Hospital
1,166
1,513
1,691
Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool
995
5,287
1,042
5,774
1,192
6,323
Inpatient Psychiatric Service for Deaf Children and Adolescents Springfield Hospital, London
1,359
1,359
1,791
1,791
2,115
2,115
ECMO (Adult)Glenfield Hospital, Leicester
2,951
2,951
2,813
2,813
3,725
3,725
ECMO (Neonates and Infants)Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
610
675
639
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
2,057
1,480 (1)
1,813
Glenfield Hospital, Leicester
1,995
4,662
2,145
4,300
2,384
4,836
ENDOUniversity College Hospital, London
2,025
2,203
2,070
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore
3,072
3,243
3,559
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham
3,110
8,207
3,678
9,124
3,933
9,562
Epidermolysis Bullosa (Paediatric)Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
783
616
682
Birmingham Children's Hospital
304
1,087
316
932
378
1,060
Epidermolysis Bullosa (Adult)St Thomas' Hospital, London
470
492
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
163
633
271
763
GauchersAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge
521
529
552
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
194
152 (1)
201
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
75
80
93
Royal Free Hospital, London
304
1,094
320
1,081
354
1,200
HTLVSt Mary's Hospital, London
365
365
588
588
Reconstructive Surgery in Adolescents for Congenital Malformation of the Female Genital Tract Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London
321
321
268
268
353
353
Intestinal FailureHope Hospital, Salford
5,497
6,120
6,677
St Mark's Hospital, London
3,280
8,777
3,966
10,086
4,168
10,845
Adult Liver TransplantationAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge
4,493
4,837
5,081
King's College Hospital, London
7,600
8,185
8,696
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham
8,152
8,665
9,270
St James's University Hospital, Leeds
4,730
4,918
5,467
Royal Free Hospital, London
2,883
3,049
3,414
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
2,865
30,723
2,897
32,551
3,304
35,232
Paediatric Liver TransplantationBirmingham Children's Hospital
2,928
2,994
3,162
Kings College Hospital, London
3,023
3,181
3,491
St James's University Hospital, Leeds
2,803
8,754
2,367
8,542
3,128
9,781
NeuromuscularHammersmith Hospital, London
270
336
401
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne
391
544
602
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
114
148
155
University College Hospital, London
197
972
164
1,192
226
1,384
Ocular OncologyRoyal Liverpool University Hospital
960
936
1,052
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
445
433
510
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
1,163
2,568
1,172
2,541
1,357
2,919
Paediatric Ventricular Assist Devices (Bridge to Transplantation—VADS or ECMO) Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
528
557
601
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
528
1,056
556
1,113
602
1,203
Paediatric Liver and Complex Hepatobiliary King's College Hospital, London
4,659
5,042
5,561
Birmingham Children's Hospital
1,873
1,939
2,112
St James's University Hospital, Leeds
1,827
8,359
1,923
8,904
2,075
9,748
Pseudomyxoma PeritoneiNorth Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke
2,763
2,996
3,076
The Christie Hospital, Manchester
811
3,574
1,409
4,405
1,806
4,882
Pulmonary Thrombo EndarterectomyPapworth Hospital, Cambridge
1,335
1,335
1,573
1,573
1,699
1,699
RetinoblastomaSt Bartholomew's Hospital, London
1,251
1,254
1,469
Birmingham Children's Hospital
873
2,124
963
2,217
990
2,459
SCIDSFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
3,279
3,499
3,840
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
2,840
6,119
4,189 (1)
7,688
3,641
7,481
Personality DisorderHenderson Hospital, London
2,423
2,301
2,681
Main House, Birmingham
1,829
1,891
2,234
Webb House, Salford
1,983
6,235
2,019
6,211
2,409
7,324
Small Bowel TransplantationBirmingham Children's Hospital
844
844
964
964
1,050
1,050
Total Anorectal ReconstructionRoyal London Hospital
491
491
477
477
565
565

Sub Total Service Agreements
151,977
151,977
164,866
164,866
182,202
182,202
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0

Paediatric Rheumatology Transplants(2)Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
0
120
0
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
0
0
51
171
0
0

Total
151,977
151,977
165,037
165,037
182,202
182,202

NEW SERVICES
Pancreas Transplants(1)Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne/ Royal Liverpool University Hospital/ Manchester Royal Infirmary/ Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge/ St Mary's Hospital, London/ Churchill Hospital, Oxford/ Guy's Hospital, London
3,309
3,309

TOTAL
151,977
151,977
165,037
165,037
185,511
185,511

Notes:

1.  Remapping between commissioners has taken place

2.  This service is funded on a cost per case basis.

  3.7.2  Could the Department specify the proportion of the acute commissioning budget currently spent on specialised services? Could this please be broken down by PCT region?

  1.  This information is not centrally collected.

  3.7.3  Could the Department outline any changes in the overall pattern of expenditure on specialised services since the devolution of responsibility for commissioning to PCTs?

  1.  This information is not centrally collected.

  3.7.4  Could the Department specify which healthcare resource groups (HRGs) currently capture specialist services?

  1.  All admitted patients are covered by HRGs, and approximately 90% of HRGs contain some specialised service activity.

  3.7.5  Could the Department specify how much additional resource have Foundation Trusts had to draw from the "risk pool" established by the Department? What proportion of this was attributable to expenditure on specialised services?

  1.  The Department allocated the "risk pool" to the Host PCTs of eight 1st Wave NHSFT applicants in 2004-05, as a supplement to the National Tariff. This Specialist Services Supplement (risk pool) amounted to £24.4 million nationally in 2004-05. The funding has been allocated on the basis of modelling that showed that these eight organisations were most at risk of being under-funded for the costs of specialist work under the 2004-05 Tariff.

3.8  Management and Administration Costs

  3.8.1  Could the Department please update the information provided in Table 3.8.1 in response to last year's questionnaire? [3.8.1]

  1.  An updated version of Table 3.8.1 is given below.

  2.  It has not been possible to provide the actual management costs of GP Fundholding as this information was not collected centrally.

Table 3.8.1

NHS MANAGEMENT COSTS 1996-97 to 2002-03


Actual Costs
£ million
1996-97
Actual
1997-98
Actual
1998-99
Actual
1999-2000
Actual
2000-01
Actual
2001-02
Actual
2002-03
Actual

HA (including PCGs from 1999-2000)
450
432
414
497
536
463
97
PCTs
24
224
723
NHS Trusts
1,225
1,296
1,290
1,287
1,307
1,306
1,311
GP Fundholding*
Total
1,675
1,728
1,704
1,784
1,867
1,993
2,131
NHS Total Expenditure
32,997
34,664
36,608
40,215
43,951
49,279
54,352
Management costs as % of total NHS Budget
5.1
5.0
4.7
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.9

* Figures not available

Source:

NHS trust audited summarisation schedules 1996-97 to 2002-03.

PCT audited summarisation schedules 2000-01 to 2002-03.

Health authority audited accounts 1996-97 and 1998-99.

Health authority audited summarisation forms 1999-2000 to 2002-03.

  3.8.2  What was the expenditure and staffing (WTE) of each of the Department of Health's Arm's Length Bodies in 2003-04?

  1.  The information requested is provided in Table 3.8.2.

Table 3.8.2

EXPENDITURE AND STAFFING OF ARM'S LENGTH BODIES IN 2003-04


Arm's Length
Body
Gross Operating
Costs (see notes)
Staff
£000

CHI
36,660
376
CPPIH
23,666
150
HFEA
7,324
106
Staff figs from DH sources
MHAC
3,884
45
NCSC
133,866
2,726
HPA
172,473
2,518
NBSB
17,045
305
Staff figures from DH sources
NRPB
15,158
315
PHLS
4,211
69
Figures from DH sources
DPB
23,896
325
NHSPA
19,136
277
PPA
64,826
2,919
NHSLogistics
64,590
1,377
Revenue figures excludes cost of sales
NHSPASA
20,841
318
HDA
13,121
132
NICE
17,561
81
DVTA
298
4
PMETB
3,000
27
Revenue fig from ALBs (Feb 2004) and staff fig from DH sources
NBS
364,541
5,916
UKTransplant
10,512
121
CRHP
1,436
3
GSCC
9,892
146
Rev fig excludes training grants and bursary costs.
MHRA
55,852
747
NHSAppComm
4,344
46
NHSInformation
204,837
918
NHSLitigation
11,207
182
NPSA
17,040
149
OIR
2,794
28
Revenue fig from ALBs (Feb 2004) and staff fig from DH sources. Three month figs
CFSMS
13,352
250
FHSAA (SHA)
954
13
Revenue spend fig excludes prescription penalties and provisions.
MA
232,400
765
Revenue fig from ALBs (Feb 2004) and staff fig from DH sources
NCAA
6,075
71
NHS Direct
120,000
2,000
Revenue fig from ALBs (Feb 2004) and staff fig from DH sources
NHSEstates
29,519
218
Staff fig does not include 204 Inventure staff.
NHSProfessionals
33,000
671
Revenue fig from ALBs (Feb 2004) and staff fig from DH sources
NHSU
27,888
234
Figures from DH sources.
NTAD
9,134
79
ROC
1,210
18
CHAI
3,622
84
Three months figs
CSCI
110
11
Three months figs
TOTAL
1,801,275
24,740

Notes:

1.  Additionally there is approximately £3 billion spent by ALBs directly on frontline services.For example:

NHS Logistics  £600 million

NHS Litigation  £2,000 million

NHS Professionals  £400 million

2.  NCSC, CHI and ROC were abolished on 1 April 2004.

3.  Gross operating costs exclude:

Depreciation and Amortisation

Capital Charges

Profit/Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets

Impairments

  3.8.3  Could the department please update the information provided in tables 3.8.3 on the redundancy costs for senior executives arising from Trust mergers in the past three years? The information should be provided as a global figure and on a trust-by-trust basis.  [3.8.3]

  1.  This information is no longer collected. Information on compensation for loss of office was last collected by the Department from NHS trusts in 2000-01. The disclosure requirements of the summarised accounts are determined by the Resource Accounting Manual issued by HM Treasury. Personal data are included in individual NHS trust accounts which are published locally but the data are not collected by the Department as it is not feasible to include the disclosures on individuals in the NHS trust summarised account.

  3.8.4  The reduction of 1,400 posts across the Department introduced through the Change Programme will bring a redesign of key business processes within the Department. Could the Department comment on how this will affect Parliamentary-related work, NHS data collection, and the future support of the PEQ?

General Background

  1.  The projects undertaken as part of the Change Programme looked for ways of working more effectively and efficiently. Their recommendations, combined with the changes to the Department's structure and the transfer of staff and work to partner organisations, will address the concern that "2,245 people will have to do the work of 3,600."

  2.  Elements of the Department's new ways of working outlined below illustrate how a smaller Department will manage and improve delivery within key areas.

Correspondence

  3.  In 2002 the Department answered 29% of Ministerial correspondence within the Whitehall Standard of 20 days. In July 2004, this had already increased to 83%, with further improvements expected when the Customer Service Centre is fully established (by October this year).

  4.  The Department's incoming e-mail used to be allocated to officials throughout the organisation and response times were poor. When it was centralised alongside the telephone service, there was a step change in improvement. We now answer 95% of e-mails within the target times, with about 75% answered within 2 working days.

Knowledge management

  5.  By continually assessing and developing our knowledge management processes and behaviours, we can ensure that the Department maximises use of its resources. We are improving and joining up our key databases and using IT tools to create a "one-stop information shop" via an "Enterprise" portal. A separate programme—"UNIFY" (see also paragraph below)—will be one of the key information sources available through the portal. Alongside this, we are introducing knowledge management training and a facilitated methodology to help workgroups address their detailed knowledge and information requirements.

NHS data collection and future support of the PEQ

  6.  The Change Programme's demand for effective and efficient working with reduced numbers of staff is one of the key drivers behind the Department establishing its UNIFY programme. This comprises an integrated framework for coherent, up-to-date performance and programme information supported by significant changes in working practices and effective use of IT. It enables the Department to better meet information-flow requirements, including the future support of PEQs and other business objectives by:

    —  improving service and speeding-up delivery of information to Ministers and other stakeholders

    —  ensuring our compliance with Government's Strategy for performance information

    —  reducing reliance on manual effort in data collection/reporting

    —  rationalising data collection systems by providing a single collection framework for data supporting the PSAs. This will enable improved support for NHS data collection, as it will enable:

    (i)  Strategic Health Authorities and other stakeholders to participate in information validation

    (ii)  the tailoring of information output to specific audiences—such that it is presented in the most meaningful format

UNIFY's links with other information-related initiatives

  7.  The UNIFY programme will also interface with a number of other projects and systems which focus on streamlining information, including; the new Health Information Centre (see paragraph below) and the national programme for information technology (NPfIT).

Role of the new Information Centre

  8.  A proportion of statistical collection work is being moved from the Department into the NHS in order to create a new Health and Social Care Information Centre (to be established in shadow form later this year). The Centre will, in conjunction with the output from the UNIFY project, reduce burdens on the frontline NHS by co-ordinating information requirements across a wide range of bodies. It will also facilitate accessible and reliable information flows between patients, commissioners and suppliers and will further enhance the credibility of reported information, including that used in the PEQ.

3.9  Activity and waiting times

  3.9.1  Could the Department update the information given in Tables 3.9.1 showing activity data by region, including: total activity, with trends; activity by Inpatient, Day-Case and Outpatient; maternity and simple access data? Could the Department provide figures for the ratio of Finished Consultant Episodes (FCEs) to hospital spells by Region for the same period? To what extent do a relatively small number of providers depart from the overall pattern? Could the Department report on the progress made by the NHS Information Authority in reviewing clinical information, including the use of the FCE as a measure of activity?  [3.9.1]

  1.  The information requested is provided in Tables 3.9.1(a) to (f). Earlier versions were presented by regional office, but since these regions no longer exist, the data are shown for 2001-02 and 2002-03 by Strategic Health Authority of residence.

Inpatient/Day Cases

  2.  Table 3.9.1(c) presents the number of hospital inpatient finished consultant episodes (FCEs), for ordinary admissions and day cases, as number of cases and rate per 10,000 resident population. It has now been compiled into a single table. Table 3.9.1(d) shows FCEs by method of admission. These data are for England and Strategic Health Authority areas for 2001-02 and 2002-03. Data for 2003-04 are expected to be published in early December.

Ratio of FCEs to spells

  3.  Tables 3.9.1(e) and (f) show the ratio of FCEs to hospital spells. A hospital spell may comprise more than one FCE if responsibility for the patient is passed from one consultant to another. Table 3.9.1(f) shows the 15 providers who depart most from the average ratio of 1.132 in 2002-03.

  4.  The variation in ratio from provider to provider may be quite legitimate and may be due to a number of factors, including service provision, complexity of clinical care, clinical policy, and data quality. Nevertheless, there is less range in this ratio in 2002-03 than in earlier years (maximum value 1.330, compared with 1.910 in 2001-02). This is due to the correction of an earlier failure by Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare Trust to code episodes according to nationally agreed definition. The first episode in a spell should always be numbered 1, but this trust had mistakenly numbered some 2 (considering the first "episode" to be before admission) so that they were not recognised as the start of a spell.

  Could the Department report on the progress made by the NHS Information Authority in reviewing clinical information, including the use of the FCE as a measure of activity?

  4.  The NHSIA review of specialty codes resulted in revised sets of specialties for practitioners and treatment function that were introduced from 1 April 2004. These should enable better and more appropriate analysis of HES data by specialty.

  5.  Improvements and enhancements to clinical data, and new data standards, are being developed via several projects, especially in view of the more detailed clinical information required for Clinical Governance and Clinical Audit, the commitment to move towards consultant-level reporting in HES and Payment by Results.

  6.  FCEs provide a useful base measure of activity and, with admissions and discharges, are used increasingly alongside other measures of activity. They are the building bricks for more sophisticated analysis such as emergency re-admissions used in the Clinical Indicators. HES data now routinely has a unique patient identifier, mainly derived from the NHS number, which enables analysis of patients. Further work seeks to exploit this potential beyond the limited use for clinical indicators and to allow more regular analysis of deaths by linking HES with ONS mortality data.

Table 3.9.1(a)

NEW OUTPATIENT ATTENDANCES PER 10,000 RESIDENT POPULATION 2002-03 GENERAL AND ACUTE SECTOR


OrgID
Name
New
outpatient
attendances
Attendances
per 10,000
population

Y00England
12,246,231
2,490
Q01Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire
528,263
2,446
Q02Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
314,736
1,962
Q03Essex
340,383
2,104
Q04North West London
483,920
2,720
Q05North Central London
487,750
4,016
Q06North East London
417,976
2,718
Q07South East London
436,629
2,887
Q08South West London
342,421
2,629
Q09Northumberland, Tyne and Wear
502,366
3,641
Q10County Durham & Tees Valley
285,759
2,531
Q11North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
323,721
2,010
Q12West Yorkshire
470,865
2,256
Q13Cumbria & Lancashire
413,691
2,169
Q14Greater Manchester
764,604
3,044
Q15Cheshire & Merseyside
677,718
2,891
Q16Thames Valley
475,748
2,285
Q17Hampshire and Isle of Wight
372,757
2,118
Q18Kent and Medway
339,369
2,145
Q19Surrey and Sussex
556,471
2,179
Q20Avon, Gloucestershire & Wiltshire
494,243
2,296
Q21South West Peninsula
357,481
2,272
Q22Somerset & Dorset
308,574
2,591
Q23South Yorkshire
443,189
3,502
Q24Trent
508,700
1,931
Q25Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland
302,534
1,930
Q26Shropshire and Staffordshire
339,508
2,284
Q27Birmingham and the Black Country
640,036
2,819
Q28West Midlands South
316,819
2,061

Source: Department of Health form KH09.

Table 3.9.1(b)

WARD ATTENDANCES PER 10,000 RESIDENT POPULATION 2002-03 GENERAL AND ACUTE SECTOR


OrgID
Name
Total
ward
attenders
Ward
attenders
per 10,000
population

Y00England
757,760
154
Q01Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire
28,731
133
Q02Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
19,379
121
Q03Essex
10,142
63
Q04North West London
32,270
181
Q05North Central London
8,857
73
Q06North East London
11,424
74
Q07South East London
9,478
63
Q08South West London
3,159
24
Q09Northumberland, Tyne and Wear
29,601
215
Q10County Durham & Tees Valley
36,391
322
Q11North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
30,466
189
Q12West Yorkshire
71,082
341
Q13Cumbria & Lancashire
59,656
313
Q14Greater Manchester
43,515
173
Q15Cheshire & Merseyside
35,256
150
Q16Thames Valley
24,202
116
Q17Hampshire and Isle of Wight
16,891
96
Q18Kent and Medway
20,253
128
Q19Surrey and Sussex
52,296
205
Q20Avon, Gloucestershire & Wiltshire
10,425
48
Q21South West Peninsula
20,569
131
Q22Somerset & Dorset
33,871
284
Q23South Yorkshire
43,338
342
Q24Trent
15,459
59
Q25Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland
12,957
83
Q26Shropshire and Staffordshire
18,404
124
Q27Birmingham and the Black Country
44,826
197
Q28West Midlands South
14,862
97

Source: Department of Health form KH05.

Note: KH05 is now no longer collected and no further updates will be available.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 February 2005