Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-159)

MR JOHN BACON, MR MARTIN CAMPBELL, MR ANDREW FOSTER AND MR CRAIG MUIR

28 OCTOBER 2004

  Q140 Dr Naysmith: In future that will be the information you give us?

  Mr Bacon: Again, my understanding is that is what we are looking to move to.

  Q141 Dr Naysmith: It will be slightly difficult to compare with the existing methods.

  Mr Bacon: Clearly, if you change the method of count, you have to make some estimate of transition but I think it does reflect a better measure of activity.

  Q142 Mr Burns: PSS, who is actually doing that part?

  Mr Muir: That is me.

  Q143 Mr Burns: If you look at table 4.1.4 you have set out the unit costs for various PSS from 1998-99 to 2002-03. The figures indicate that there are real term unit costs supporting older people and residential care has increased. You comment—and I quote—". . . this rise may have been associated with better or more intensive services . . . and changes in cost or efficiency". Are you able to tell us more precisely exactly what the increased unit costs indicate?

  Mr Muir: I think it is very difficult to get much below those figures. Over time I think the Commission for Social Care Inspection, and the SSI's predecessor body, have found that residential and nursing home costs have gone up and quality has gone up. It is quite difficult to get a systematic relationship between those, particularly at local level and at individual level.

  Q144 Mr Burns: If I can just ask you my next question. There is an increase in quality as well as a rise in cost?

  Mr Muir: Yes.

  Q145 Mr Burns: Can I just ask one thing for clarification. If you look at the chart itself that has been produced, it talks about gross expenditure per week and it is broken down to unit cost price. When it says gross expenditure, does that mean the actual cost of providing the service or the actual cost that local social service departments are paying for the service?

  Mr Muir: You mean net of charges, is that what you are getting at?

  Q146 Mr Burns: Yes.

  Mr Muir: I think it is the gross cost not taking account of charges but I could not swear to that, I could get back to you with a definite answer on that.

  Q147 Mr Burns: Local authorities pay X pounds a week per client to a home, but that might not necessarily be the actual cost to the home that is providing the service, and I was just wondering about that explanation.

  Mr Bacon: I am fairly confident that the number you see in there is the cost to the local authority of placement.

  Q148 Mr Burns: Sorry, cost to the local authority?

  Mr Muir: The gross cost to the local authority, in other words funding the local authority placements.

  Q149 Mr Burns: So it is not necessarily the cost of the service?

  Mr Muir: Of course that is a combination of the actual cost they pay to run their own facilities and the amount they pay to a private sector or a voluntary sector to run theirs. I am fairly confident what it is but if it is not that we will let you know.

  Q150 Mr Burns: There is a belief abroad that a number of social service departments use their power of purchasing to force down the prices that they are prepared to pay to residential homes, particularly medium and small sized ones who are weaker economically, by offering them X amount a week on a take it or leave it basis. The leave it basis sometimes means that a home would then have to go out of business. Do you agree with that belief?

  Mr Muir: I think that councils negotiate fee levels and decide fee levels in the light of local circumstances including what the market conditions are, what the supply of care home places are and their overall policy in terms of the mix of intensive support at home or in residential homes. All those factors as well as local costs factors need to be taken into account. The guidance the Department gives in this area is that you should have proper negotiations and discussions with all the parties involved and that you do take into account all of those factors which I have just mentioned and that the discussions should reflect the real cost to the provider of providing the service. It has to be for the local authority to decide what level of fee is appropriate in the light of all of those conditions.

  Q151 Mr Burns: Have you ever had any personal experience of these negotiations?

  Mr Muir: I have not had direct experience of a local authority negotiation but I have chaired a group of  local authority representatives, provider representatives and so on talking about this very issue.

  Q152 Mr Burns: Can you explain to me, in the light of everything you said, if you take Rowntree Trust figures, Laing and Buisson, if you were to talk to Essex Social Services department—and just to make the point I will give you some figures to illustrate it—why is it then that when Essex, for example, owned their own homes, they were charging in effect about £600 per client a week, the homes where they placed residents that were privately owned they pay about £350 a week?

  Mr Muir: It is very difficult to get comparisons between the costs, and I think you are talking about the costs of the local authority home rather than the fees, because it is quite difficult to get comparable costs between local authority provision and private provision.

  Q153 Mr Burns: To be fair, if you make the point that I have just made to Essex County Council, they would not be taking your line and disputing the figures, they would say "Yes, we do".

  Mr Muir: I have not disputed the figures, I am saying it is quite difficult at a general level to get very comparable figures partly because councils associate the costs in different ways in accountancy terms but also because private organisations do not want necessarily to tell us what their costs are because that is commercially confidential. I think I do accept there is probably a differential in cost between the private sector—

  Chairman: Is not a fairly obvious reason, certainly from my experience—

  Mr Burns: Do not feed him the answers.

  Chairman: I am not.

  Q154 Mr Burns: Let me finish. I have not finished questioning him. When I have finished questioning him maybe then you can try and bail him out. Let me just carry on for the moment. You have accepted that but what you have not answered is why does it happen?

  Mr Muir: There could be a number of reasons for that. One might be that they are less efficient, I suppose, but another might be there is a greater dependency in council homes.

  Q155 Mr Burns: Not necessarily.

  Mr Muir: In a sense, the provision of the commissioning of care has to be done through best value so a council will need to take account of the quality, the outcomes and the cost in doing that.

  Q156 Mr Burns: Are you familiar with the Competition Tribunal decision in Belfast on this issue?

  Mr Muir: Is this the super complaint you are talking about?

  Q157 Mr Burns: Yes.

  Mr Muir: Yes

  Q158 Mr Burns: Why does this not apply on mainland Britain or even England?

  Mr Muir: The position is different.

  Q159 Mr Burns: Why?

  Mr Muir: I am afraid I would have to look into the details of that and give you a note.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 December 2004