Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


APPENDIX 46

Letter from David North, Government Affairs Director Tesco, to the Clerk of the Committee (OB 97A)

  At the evidence session on 4 December, the Committee requested further information on our involvement with the 5-a-Day campaign, the increase in fruit and vegetable sales amongst our customers and our promotional activity.

  I am sorry it has taken some time to respond, due mainly to the changing legal situation in respect of the Five-a-Day issue below.

FIVE-A -DAY

  We launched Cancer Research UK's Five-a-Day campaign nationally in our stores in May 2002. The central message—"Eat at least five portions of different fruit and vegetables a day to help prevent cancer"—was entirely consistent with the Department of Health's own public statements. The NHS Plan in July 2000 stated clearly that "increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is considered the second most effective strategy to reduce the risk of cancer . . . Eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day could lead to estimated reductions of up to 20% in overall deaths from chronic diseases".

  We were pleased with the response to the initiative. A very large majority of customers surveyed said that they found the Five-a-day message relevant to their lifestyles, approved of the partnership with Cancer Research UK, and were keen that the message should be reinforced regularly. We kept closely in touch with Department of Health Ministers and officials on the initiative.

  Nevertheless, a small number of local authority Trading Standards Departments took issue with the initiative, alleging that it breached the Food Labelling Regulations 1996, which prohibit the "labelling or advertising of food with the claim that it has the property of preventing, treating or curing a human disease or any reference to such a property".

  We responded that this concern was misguided, given that the initiative conveyed a message that had been devised and disseminated by the government and by Cancer Research UK. It was generic in nature and did not seek to promote any particular fruit or vegetable, and certainly not any specific brand. Indeed, we were clear from the outset that the initiative was less a marketing campaign than a service for our customers, conveying valuable public health information. The Food Labelling Regulations were intended to protect consumers from unjustified health claims used to sell specific products, not general public health information endorsed and promoted by the government and by respected health charities.

  We were reinforced in this view by the actions and statements of the Department of Health. In a debate in the Commons in July 2002, Public Health Minister Hazel Blears explained that she "was recently in a supermarket and was pleased to see that supermarkets are beginning to market their goods in relation to `five a day'. Indeed, that same year, the government launched its own Five-a-Day logo, "designed to be a trusted and reassuring symbol that reminds people of the benefits of eating five portions of fruit and vegetables a day". In launching the logo, the Department of Health explained that it would "appear in supermarkets and on food packaging . . . If the logo appears on a product, people can be confident that it will count towards the recommended daily target for fruit and vegetables".

  Despite all this, Shropshire County Council persisted with their investigation and their threat of a criminal prosecution. As a result, we reached the reluctant conclusion last year that we had no alternative but to amend our message from "Eat at least 5 portions of different fruit and veg a day to help prevent cancer" to "Eat at least 5 portions of different fruit and veg a day for healthier living".

  However, Shropshire Trading Standards Officers are at this point still pursuing their criminal investigation. They have stated that they are considering proceeding to a prosecution against Tesco (and possibly a Tesco Director personally).

INCREASE IN FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SALES

  I undertook to provide more information on the extent to which less-affluent customers helped to account for Tesco's 7.5% increase in like-for-like sales of fruit, vegetables and salads over the past year. Spending on fruit, vegetables and salads by our less-affluent customer group has increased by 10%, compared to 8% among mid-market customers and 4% among affluent customers.

  I believe these figures show that Tesco is helping to make a healthy diet accessible across all income groups, including less-affluent families.

PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITY

  Tesco is very committed to promoting fruit, vegetables and salads as part of a balanced diet. The amount we spend on promoting fruit, vegetables and salads, expressed as a percentage of total promotional spend, exceeds the proportion of our sales of these products.

  The number of weekly promotions across fruit, vegetables and salads can typically be around 80 or more. This compares to a typical weekly number of promotions on confectionery of around 15 (albeit rising to around 50 at key times such as Christmas and Easter).

  In our experience, to be effective, promotions of fruit, vegetables and salads need to appeal to all our customers on two key points: price and seasonality. Our range of offers ensures that all customers can benefit, eg families or larger households may benefit from multi-buy offers, whereas people from single or smaller households will find money-off deals more appealing. We also offer our `Value' brand of fruit, vegetables and salads, aimed specifically at price-conscious customers. There are currently over 30 `Value' brand products, including grapes, carrots, apples, and stir-fry vegetables.

  Seasonality is also important in making produce promotions effective, eg brussel sprouts at Christmas and strawberries during Wimbledon fortnight. We sold 3 million punnets of strawberries over Wimbledon fortnight alone. We have just run a seasonal promotion on stir fry vegetables to coincide with Chinese New Year.

  In order to ensure the maximum impact of our produce promotions, we put them in the most visible places (eg end of aisles).

  The comparison between produce and confectionery promotions is not easy to make, given that the majority of confectionery is branded, which means promotional activity is largely determined by brand owners, in consultation with retailers, rather than solely by retailers. However, effective promotions of confectionery, biscuits etc also tie in to key events such as Christmas, Easter and Halloween, with price offers such as multi-buys and money-off.

  Please let me know if we can provide any additional information. I would appreciate if you could keep us informed about the date of publication of the Committee's report.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 14 June 2004