Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by Dr Chris Corrigan (AL 17)

SENDER DETAILS

  This report is submitted by Dr Chris Corrigan MA, MSc, PhD, FRCP, Reader and Consultant in Respiratory Medicine and Allergy at Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London.

  I submit the report both in a personal capacity, running a busy and comprehensive allergy service at Guy's Hospital, and as Secretary of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the professional body representing NHS clinical and academic allergists in both primary and secondary care in Great Britain, and as secretary of the Joint Committee for Higher Medical Training in Allergy, the Royal College Committee responsible for the training of new doctors as specialist allergists.

EVIDENCE BASED ON TERMS OF REFERENCE

Availability of allergy services (including issues such as geographical distribution, access times and patient choice) and specialist services for patients with severe allergies

  The availability, geographical distribution and access times for NHS allergy services are woefully poor countrywide. The full details are set out in a recent publication from the Royal College of Physicians: Allergy, the unmet need: a blueprint for better patient care (London: Royal College of Physicians, 2003). For accurate appraisal of the situation, the Committee should be thoroughly familiar with this document. In brief:

  We are in the middle of an epidemic increase of allergic diseases. Allergic diseases are by far the commonest diseases today in the UK. In any given year, 12 million people in the UK (one fifth of the population) are likely to be seeking treatment for allergy. Peanut allergy, which may in some cases produce fatal anaphylaxis, now affects one in 70 children (that is, one child in every year of every school in the UK). Asthma and allergic rhinitis (hay fever) rank top of the list of causes of loss of time from school and work in the UK. Approximately 20% of the population, both adults and children, suffer from hay fever in the UK. Although this disease does not have the glamour of cancer or heart disease, it must be taken seriously. About one third of the 12 million people who suffer report that the symptoms adversely affect their work, home and social lives. Among children and teenagers in particular, hay fever can cause learning difficulties caused by fatigue and inability to concentrate, with poor examination results. Hay fever at exam-time is so troublesome that it is cited as one reason for considering a change in the traditional three-term school year. In the USA, which has a similar prevalence of hay fever to that seen in the UK, two million lost working days, three million lost school days and 28 million days of decreased productivity annually are attributed to this disease alone.

  The Royal College of Physicians report notes that there are only six fully staffed allergy clinics in the UK. These have developed around centres with an interest in allergy research, and do not represent the product of NHS planning or support. They are located mainly in London and the South East, creating a marked geographical inequality in service provision. Allergy barely features in the undergraduate training curriculum for medical students, and the lack of specialists means that virtually no clinical training is available, Consequently, most medical practitioners are ignorant of the practice of allergy, and have no idea of the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits potentially open to these millions of sufferers.

  What other allergy services do exist in the UK are run part-time by consultants in other disciplines (immunology, dermatology, paediatrics, respiratory medicine, ENT). While excellent in their respective fields, these clinics do not have the capacity to cope with the rising tide of allergy or with the increasing complexity of allergic disease (for example, a child with peanut allergy who also has eczema, hay fever, asthma and glue ear). Allergy is increasingly a multi-system disorder and must be managed accordingly.

  Patients with severe allergic diseases simply do not know where to turn. As evidence of this I present a selection of pleas reproduced verbatim from (anonymised) patients received on the BSACI web site (www.bsaci.org) between January and April of this year. During this period the web site received 1,117 "hits" on the section providing information on what allergy services are available in the UK.

  From South Wales:

    My son has severe eczema I would like to know if you could help. I have tried almost everything he is six and is getting very aware of his appearance.

    Nearest clinic Cardiff, 20 miles away, staffed by consultants whose primary speciality is not allergy.

  From Cleethorpes, Lincolnshire:

    I would appreciate a list of allergy clinics in the UK, particularly in Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire. I live in Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire.

    Clinics in Scunthorpe, Leeds and Sheffield, nearest 25 miles away, all staffed by consultants whose primary speciality is not allergy.

  From Kent:

    My name is __________, I am 30 years old and I am from Italy. I moved to England in 2000 and since I have had problems in finding a doctor specialised in Allergology. Unfortunately, since I can remember, I have always suffered of severe forms of allergy, including anaphylaxis, and I had a specialist in Rome who used to take care of me. At the moment, and after a couple of year of apparent calm, I am experiencing high discomfort due to some "minor" forms of allergy/intolerance—urticaria, rashes, vomiting/diarrhoea—I forgot to mention that most of my allergies are related to food (legumes, maize, most fruits and vegetables, shellfish, porc etc), even though I badly suffered in the past from insect stings, pollen and dust (I had very bad asthma in my childhood). After a serious reaction to asparagus—which ended up in hospital—my GP referred me to a dermatologist, however, this doctor could not do anything for me, apart from prescribing some adrenaline to carry. At this moment in time I would like to have a more thorough investigation of my allergies, possibly with some more tests to be carried out, in order to find out which are my allergies now—I am under the impression that they have slightly changed in time and that I am now avoiding the wrong food and eating something that is actually "poisoning" me. For these reasons, I would like to ask you if you can kindly give me some information on a specialised clinic/doctor in my area (south-east of England) or, worst case scenario, in the whole country, who could help me better understand my condition. Thank you in advance for your understanding.

    Nearest clinics Southampton or London.

  From Aberdeen, Scotland:

    I have had 10-15 allergy attacks in last two years with two x anaphylaxis emergencies. I cannot connect with any pattern of food or exercise and waiting list in Aberdeen to see a consultant is two years. Any help would be appreciated very much. I am prepared to travel anywhere in the UK and pay for the help.

    No clinics in Scotland run by consultants whose primary speciality is allergy.

  From Chaddesden, Derby:

    I am particularly interested in finding out where I can get my children food intolerance tested due to behavioural problems. Please can you contact me as soon as possible as this is now of an urgent nature.

    Nearest clinic Nottingham, staffed by consultants whose primary speciality is not allergy

  From Lyme Regis, Dorset:

    I live in Lyme Regis and I am curious if there are going to be any clinics near us—the Devon/Dorset border? Thank you.

    Nearest clinic Plymouth, staffed by consultants whose primary speciality is not allergy

Priorities for improving services

  These are set out in the RCP report referred to above. I earnestly and urgently request, on behalf of the existing allergy specialists and the 12 million suffering patients, that the government consider and implement these.

  The provision of allergy care in the NHS must be led by specialists trained in allergy, so that appropriate standards of care can be achieved and maintained. Although the front line of allergy management will be in Primary Care, with no Primary Care skill base from which to work, clinical leadership must come initially from specialist centres.

  Consequently, the NHS needs to move forward on two fronts. As a first step, more consultant posts and funded training posts in allergy are required. These will provide the basis for a national training and clinical development initiatives, as well as the basis of a genuinely national allergy service for NHS patients. This will require recognition of need, and then appropriate action from the Department of Health, the Workforce Numbers Advisory Board, Primary Care Trusts, Regional Commissioners and Trust managers. Allergy is also recognised for regional specialist commissioning, and this must be implemented.

  More specifically, the RCP plan envisages that each of the eight NHS Regions in England (as configured in 2001, each with a population of five to seven million), as well as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, should have an absolute minimum of one specialist allergy centre staffed by a minimum of two whole time equivalent consultant allergists, a minimum of two full time allergy nurse specialists, one half time adult dietician and one half-time paediatric dietician with specialist training in food allergy, two consultants in paediatric allergy supported by paediatric nurse specialists and facilities and funding for training for two specialist registrars in allergy.

  The regional centres would provide specialist expertise for adult and paediatric allergic disease, manage allergic disease which cannot be dealt with in primary care, act as an educational resource for the Region and facilitate local training in allergy for non-allergy specialists, GPs and practise nurses.

  In addition, further consultant allergist posts need to be created in other teaching hospital and district general hospitals in each Region to deal with local needs. All teaching hospitals should have an allergy service provided by a consultant allergist. One model might be for a shared appointment between Trusts.

  The training of GPs and practice nurses in allergy must be improved. A key part of this will result from interaction with consultant allergists, and the inclusion of clinical allergy training in the undergraduate curriculum.

Governance and regulation of independent sector providers

  Although some qualified allergists work in the private sector, these are very few and far between. It is understandable that patients, in their desperation to receive help, have turned to less orthodox techniques of allergy diagnosis, often with no proven merit. For example, many High Street health food and other stores, fitness centres and similar establishments advertise diagnostic tests for "allergy" which in many cases are of unproven scientific worth. There appears to be little regulation or national governance of these tests and practises. They often cost considerable sums of money. The failure to make a proper diagnosis and offer rational management can add to patient suffering, for example by enforcing inappropriate or unnecessary dieting or other changes of lifestyle. Quite apart from the loss of productivity this entails, not to mention the chance of significant illness and even death, these patients will eventually come back to the NHS, adding further to the NHS healthcare burden.

Additional comments on training issues

  Training of new specialist allergists is one of the cornerstones of the priorities for improving allergy services referred to above. Speaking as secretary of the Royal College of Physicians Joint Committee on Higher Medical Training for allergy, which is responsible for setting the training curricula and standards for trainee allergy specialist registrars across the UK, I must voice concern on behalf of the Committee about the paucity of centrally funded allergy training posts made available in the UK since allergy was recognised as a unique speciality.

  The Department of Health Workforce Numbers Advisory Board has recommended 20 new, centrally funded National Training Numbers for trainee allergists between 2005 and 2007. Our experience shows, however, that there is no certainty that these recommendations will become reality, as the quota was reduced from seven to nought last year. The specialty eventually received one new NTN following rigorous appeal. In the previous year, just one post was funded. Excellent training centres hotly contest these posts, and it is a constant source of frustration that so many applicants are disappointed. At present, the JCHMT estimates that there is immediate capacity in existing allergy centres to commence training of 12 new specialist allergists. Allergy is predicted to show negative growth by 2012 according to the Department of Health's own estimates; it is one of only two medical specialities in this situation. The speciality cannot grow unless more trainees are provided. On behalf of the BSACI, JCHMT and as a personal plea, I respectfully request that the government intervenes directly to make more allergy training posts available as a matter of urgency.

  The appointment of new trainees must progress in concert with the establishment of new allergy centres with specialist trainers and suitable training facilities. This will happen if, and only if the recommendation by the Department of Health that regional centres of excellence for allergy should be established, which was reiterated in the recent Report of the Royal College of Physicians Working Party referred to above, is implemented. There are grave concerns, however, as to whether the current arrangements for health care commissioning at regional and national levels are sufficiently robust to cope with the financial pressures and service aspirations of specialist allergy centres. In short, it seems possible that many of these commissioning bodies simply do not appreciate the size and urgency of the problem. At best there will be inevitable debate on priorities for funding of specialist services nationwide as opposed to addressing local issues and initiatives. It is also understandable that regional funding and commissioning bodies look inwards, rather than outwards, no matter how inappropriate this may be. It is therefore important for the commissioning process to understand the need to provide care for larger populations by specialist teams. This is essential not only to guarantee the quality of patient care, but also to allow time and space for the training of specialists, promoting innovation and research. For these reasons we respectfully repeat our earnest and urgent request that the government take direct action in this matter to ensure that the needs of 12 million UK citizens are met by their National Health Service in a timely and equitable fashion.

May 2004






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 November 2004