Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by Dr R S H Pumphrey (AL 21)

  Dr Richard Pumphrey is a consultant Immunologist and Clinical Manager of the Immunology Laboratories that provide a Regional Immunology Service for the North of Wales, East Cheshire, Greater Manchester and northwards. His unit also provides a full time allergy clinic service and has done much to develop and support both adult and paediatric allergy services for the North West. He also acts as a medical adviser to the Anaphylaxis Campaign (a patient protagonist group for patients with severe allergies).

SUMMARY

  This memorandum is to bring to the attention of the inquiry the ongoing epidemiological studies on severe allergic reactions carried out at the Immunology Service at Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals Trust.

SPECIALIST SERVICES FOR SEVERE ALLERGIES

  1.  A register of all fatal anaphylactic reactions in the UK has been maintained since 1992. This has provided invaluable information about the basic epidemiology of fatal acute allergic reactions, what makes allergies dangerous and where efforts should be concentrated to reduce fatalities. It has been possible to confirm only 20 acute allergic fatalities each year but there are reasons to believe this is an underestimate. Work continues to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in such fatalities. Publications arising from this include:

    Pumphrey RSH. Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1144-50.

    Pumphrey RSH. Fatal anaphylaxis in the UK, 1992-2001. 2004. Anaphylaxis. Wiley, Chichester (Novartis Foundation Symposium 257) 116-132.

    Pumphrey RS, Roberts IS. Postmortem findings after fatal anaphylactic reactions. J Clin Pathol. 2000; 53: 273-6.

    Pumphrey RSH, Davis S. Under-reporting of antibiotic anaphylaxis may put patients at risk. Lancet. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1157-8.

    Pumphrey RSH. Fatal posture in anaphylactic shock. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:451-2.

    Pumphrey RS, Nicholls JM. Epinephrine-resistant food anaphylaxis. Lancet. 2000; 355: 1099.

  2.  A clinic database with details of patients with anaphylaxis, their reactions and the treatment given allows epidemiological analysis of causes, treatments and outcomes. The information held goes beyond any that will be incorporated in the ICRS (electronic patient record). The Food Standards Agency helped fund the development of this database. The findings from this remain largely unpublished but we have published a report on the early findings:

    Pumphrey RS, Stanworth SJ. The clinical spectrum of anaphylaxis in north-west England. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996;26:1364-70

  3.  In the course of these studies the author has audited the accuracy of both death register and hospital discharge ICD-coding for anaphylaxis and would urge the inquiry to use statistics from such data with extreme caution. ICD coding works well for common conditions but poorly for uncommon ones: anaphylaxis poses particular problems because, for reasons described in detail in the references listed above, it is unexpectedly difficult to diagnose accurately.

PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING SERVICES

  1.  Deaths from allergic reactions to foods have been almost exclusively limited to those who have not had specialist advice about their allergies. The problem arises as much from the unwillingness of General Practitioners to recognise the importance of accurate diagnosis and appropriate management advice in those with potentially life-threatening allergies an from a shortage of clinics in which such patients can be assessed and advised. GPs have many demands on their attention and allergies are often seen more as a nuisance than a healthcare problem. Fatal reactions occur as commonly in those with only minor previous reactions as those who have had severe ones: appropriate advice needs to be given to everyone with IgE-mediated food allergy. Some way must be found to facilitate identification of, assessment of and advice to these patients.

  2.  Acute allergic reactions to foods are particularly common in children but fortunately not commonly life-threatening. They do, however cause great concern and often receive inappropriate management, exacerbating the anxiety, degrading quality of life and compromising the education and social development of the child. Most hospitals have a paediatrician with an interest in asthma and basic knowledge about allergies—very few have a specialist interest in helping children with allergies. Until more can be trained, outreach clinics from specialist allergy centres can make significant improvements in the management of children with such allergies by informing the local paediatricians: an alternative is for the DGH paediatricians to make regular visits to the allergy centre and contribute to the centres paediatric allergy capacity.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  (a)  It will be helpful to continue collecting detailed data on fatal anaphylaxis to inform recommendations for better management to avoid further fatality in future. The findings so far indicate that most anaphylactic deaths occurring outside hospital are avoidable.

  (b)  The author is aware of the potential if the ICRS for informing recommendations for improved healthcare but would wish to point out that the data in the ICRS will never be sufficiently detailed to optimally inform improvements in allergy management. Further development of specialised databases such as that partially funded by the Food Standards Agency in the author's Immunology Unit will provide invaluable information.

  (c)  Resources are needed to develop specialist centres that integrate paediatric and adult allergy services: many severe allergies cause problems just at the boundary between paediatric and adult care.

  (d)  Until such time as sufficient allergy and paediatric allergy specialists have been recruited and trained, the corpus of paediatric and adult immunologists with specialist interest in allergy should be supported in their efforts to improve services and in training specialist allergy nurses, whose remit may extend into primary care, helping GPs to recognise patients who would benefit by specialist assessment.

  If required, the author would be happy to provide oral evidence on the topic of life-threatening allergy within the UK.

May 2004






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 November 2004