Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by Alan M Edwards (AL 42)

  I am a Clinical Assistant at the David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre based at the St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust, Newport Isle of Wight. I am responding to a letter sent to Dr SH Arshad, Medical Director of the Centre. Dr Arshad left the Centre in December 2003 to take up a post as Senior Lecturer at a new medical school in Stoke on Trent. The Centre is currently seeking to appoint a new Medical Director.

  The David Hide Centre was established in the 1980s to undertake research into allergy and allergic disease. One of the research projects undertaken, the investigation of the effect of dietary artificial colours and preservatives on childhood behaviour (Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder), did hit the national press, television and radio last week after its publication. The Centre is a private trust but is located in the confines of St Mary's Hospital and in addition to research also provides a NHS allergy service to the island. The staffs are employed as either NHS personnel, joint NHS/Research or Research only.

  I joined the Centre in April 2001. Previously my main career had been in the clinical development of drug treatment for allergic disease in the pharmaceutical industry but I have worked as a clinical assistant in two other allergy clinics, at Leicester General Hospital, Leicester in the 1970s and 1980s and in the Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton from 1995 to 2001. I was also a member of a working party set up by the British Allergy Society to examine allergic disease in the 1990s.

  The population of the Isle of Wight is 137,000 but does increase in the summer months with visitors. The Centre provides up to eight allergy clinics/week covering both adults and children and just about manages to keep the appointment waiting times down to less than six months. One factor in this is the large increase in allergy and allergic disease amongst the population. The prevalence of three manifestations of allergy, asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema has been compared in two birth cohorts, one being the 1,536 newborns born on the island between January 1989 and April 1990 with the 969 newborns born between September 2001 and August 2002 (Pereira BN et al. EAACI presentation 2003). The cumulative prevalence of reported asthma amongst parents and siblings of these newborn infants increased from 8.64% to 21.58%, that of allergic rhinitis from 15.54% to 25.03% and that of eczema from 12.55% to 24.04%.

  Allergic disease is a consequence of the reaction between the individual genetically predisposed to become sensitised, and substances (allergens) in the surrounding environment. These substances can be airborne, as exemplified by house dust mites, plant pollens and animal material or swallowed as foods and drinks or act as contact allergens such as soap powders. Sensitisation and exposure to airborne allergens results in asthma, allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis and allergic eczema and to contact allergens as contact dermatitis. Exposure to food allergens can result in a range of clinical manifestations some of which are controversial but anaphylaxis, urticaria and angioedema, allergic eczema, allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, irritable bowel syndrome, behaviour disorders (ADHD) in children and cow's milk allergy in infancy are all conditions that are recognised being caused by food allergens in certain cases. Certainly these are all conditions that are referred to allergy clinics for investigation.

  The staff required to provide allergy services need to be a team of medical personnel covering a range of disciplines and skills. The doctors need to be able to deal with both adults and children and to have a working knowledge of respiratory disease, ENT disease, ophthalmology, dermatology, gastroenterology, behaviour disorders in childhood as well as basic immunology and resuscitation techniques to allow the use of immunotherapy. There is a need for specialist nurses skilled in the administration of inhaled drugs, in the use of topical treatments for skin diseases, and able to carry out lung function tests, allergy skin prick tests and allergy patch tests, to advise on methods of reducing exposure to allergens and also able to administer immunotherapy injections. There is a need for specialist dieticians with knowledge of allergy and immunology who are able to use elimination and reintroduction diets and challenge tests in the investigation of food allergy and intolerance. Finally the allergy unit placed within a general hospital so that access to specialists in the clinical disciplines is available for referral for the diagnosis and treatment of those patients who are not suffering from allergies.

  We are very fortunate at the David Hide Centre in that due to the foresight of its founder, Dr David Hide, (sadly deceased), all of the medical, nursing and dietetic skills are available. The referred patient is able to see at a single visit, the doctor to make the diagnosis, the specialist nurse to carry out the necessary allergy tests and to advise on allergen exclusion, on the correct use of inhaled drugs and the use of topical skin preparations including wet-wrapping. They are also able to see a specialist dietician who will start the process of elimination and challenge for food allergy and intolerance and advise on the details of exclusion diets. In addition we can carry out immunotherapy treatments and conduct single blind or double blind challenges for food allergy. For children these may need to be carried out in the children's ward in the hospital, to which we also have access. All this is against a very active background of allergy research.

  I suspect that the allergy service provided at this centre is unique. Certainly at other allergy clinics at which I have worked where access to specialist nurses and dieticians was not always available, the service provided was less than adequate.

  Allergic disease is not always regarded as a disease that requires specialist investigation and treatment. It is mostly not life threatening apart from the increasing problem with anaphylaxis to peanuts which can and has resulted in the death of teenagers. However the chronicity of allergic diseases, particularly eczema and asthma in both adults and children can cause a great deal of distress. There is also an increasing problem of ADHD in young children causing distress at home and at school. All of these conditions deserve adequate investigation and treatment by specialist teams.

  As an example of why a specialist and team approach is necessary; I have recently had referred two healthy young men, aged 15 and 16 who wish to join the armed services as a career. They were diagnosed as having peanut allergy as infants or children. This has been successfully managed by avoiding eating peanuts. It is apparently now a rule that the armed services will not accept anyone with peanut allergy. Why? We are having to carry out skin tests and blood tests to confirm and evaluate the allergy. The nurses and dietician will then perform peanut challenges (with physician backup) under controlled conditions to see how great a risk still exists. It would be sad if these young men are denied a chosen career on the basis of a theoretical risk. However it is going to require the skills and knowledge of a specialist team to evaluate the nature of this risk.

  Finally I must make it clear that the views expressed in this memorandum are my own personal ones and may not reflect the views of my colleagues at the David Hide Centre, nor the Trustees of the centre nor the staff and management of St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust.

June 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 November 2004