Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by Professor Roger J Buckley (AL 70)

  I am glad of the opportunity to comment on the forthcoming inquiry on the provision of allergy services.

  1.  Ocular allergy affects around 21% of the adult population of this country, usually on a seasonal basis.

  2.  Ocular allergy is not fully addressed by clinical allergists, dermatologists, pediatricians, ENT specialists, chest physicians, general practitioners or others who diagnose and treat allergic disease, principally because they do not have the equipment or training to enable them to examine the ocular tissues in detail. Insufficient ophthalmologists, even including those specialising in ocular surface and anterior segment disorders, have a specific interest in ocular allergy. The result is that the medical profession as a whole neglects this important area.

  3.  It is often left to nurses, pharmacists and the patients themselves to diagnose and treat ocular allergy, using Pharmacy medicines.

  4.  Whereas most ocular allergy does not threaten sight, there exist important severe chronic diseases (such as vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjundivitis) that are specifically sight-threatening. Such conditions should only be managed by ophthalmologists experienced in such work.

  5.  In conclusion, ocular allergy is a neglected area in this country. Professional bodies such as the Royal College of Ophthalmologists could address this issue by providing training programs, in the first instance for trainee ophthalmologists.

May 2004






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 November 2004