Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 71-79)

8 JULY 2004

DR GRAHAM RICH, MS LYN REYNOLDS AND MR ED LESTER

  Q71 Chairman: Good morning. May I particularly welcome our witnesses. We are grateful for your presence here today and for your cooperation with our short inquiry. Could you each briefly introduce yourself to the Committee.

  Dr Rich: My name is Dr Graham Rich. I am Chief Executive of West Hull Primary Care Trust.

  Ms Reynolds: I am Lyn Reynolds. I am Primary Care Development Manager from East Anglian Ambulance Trust.

  Mr Lester: I am Ed Lester, Chief Executive of NHS Direct.

  Q72 Chairman: Dr Rich, as the only person who might be familiar with Hull, which parts of Hull do you cover? How far west do you go?

  Dr Rich: We cover all of the population within the city boundaries, so everything to the west of the River Hull. There are two PCTs in Hull and we are one of the two.

  Q73 Chairman: Thank you. Could I ask you for your general thoughts on the past provision and practice in the delivery of out of hours? Obviously there is a kind of patchwork quilt that appears to have developed over many years. What are your views on how good the quality of the services has been and its variability and what are your general thoughts on how it has evolved in the way it has evolved?

  Mr Lester: Back in 2001 we entered into 34 exemplars with a number of different doctors' co-operatives around the country. It was quite a diverse mix and the idea was to see just how this would actually operate. We have had mixed success. Some have been extremely successful and some have been less than successful. Those that have been really successful are those where a partnership has been created, where there has been transparency between the partners who are involved in the venture and there is an objective that is understood by all of those who are participating. Where that happens, it is very successful. It does not matter necessarily whether co-operatives are co-located, for example, with ourselves or whether they are remote. The important thing is that the partnership is rigorous and well understood.

  Ms Reynolds: In Norfolk we have six GP co-ops, Prime Care and a number of practices and individuals providing their own on-call. We even had one practice with every single possible scenario. Each organisation operated independently from each other and there were varying levels of robustness and quality. We have now brought all those together under the leadership of the ambulance trust. So far it has worked extremely well. We are able now to offer much more of a team approach. It does not matter that the patient belongs to that practice; we can now offer the choice of which primary care centre they would like to visit, depending on their location and access.

  Q74 Chairman: Why is it that certain solutions appear to have developed in certain areas? You have gone for an ambulance trust solution. Why do you think that has happened in your area and not in others? It has happened in Hull as well. Why has it not happened elsewhere? What specific reasons are there for this happening in your two areas and perhaps not elsewhere?

  Ms Reynolds: Certainly in Norfolk the co-ops saw the opportunity to dissolve but work with the ambulance trust to transition into the new service. The proposal we put forward was in collaboration with the GP co-ops. The level of quality that operated between some of the co-ops and some of the Prime Care areas varied, so it was an opportunity to standardise a lot of the systems, processes and quality.

  Q75 Chairman: Is it the fact that you are predominantly a rural area?

  Ms Reynolds: Yes. We have both: we have Norwich City, Great Yarmouth, King's Lynn and extremely rural areas. It is a very difficult area to cover.

  Dr Rich: We have a slightly different situation. We have a highly dense population in an inner city urban area. We did not have GP co-ops operating locally, we only had one private provider locally. Practices asked the PCT to work on developing another option and we started to think about how we could construct an out-of-hours service which could offer an alternative to this. We thought that we needed call-handling, logistics, staffing, rotas, good response, and that really points to an ambulance trust solution for us as one of the options. That is what took us down that line.

  Q76 Chairman: You two have gone in that direction; other areas possibly have not. I can see the logic. What would be your ideas as to why other areas have not followed your logic?

  Ms Reynolds: We were integrated with the co-ops right from the onset. We provided the infrastructure in terms of call-handling, cars, communications and staff.

  Q77 Chairman: So there is history there that you built on.

  Ms Reynolds: Yes.

  Dr Rich: We also had good working relationships with the ambulance trust, who had already tried GPs in cars, and started to work on their demand management to try to help with the ambulance call demand.

  Mr Lester: It sounds a bit simplistic but it is all about the chemistry and relationship between the individuals when they set out. If they really have a single purpose, then it will work. If there is not that communication and there is not that relationship, it tends not to be as successful, as we said.

  Chairman: In respect of ambulance trusts, geographically they cover a larger area. One wonders whether we are looking here at a lack of some sort of strategic joining that has helped the two trusts from whom we have heard to forge ahead with what seems to be an interesting model.

  Q78 Mr Jones: My question is particularly to Ms Reynolds and Dr Rich. What experience have you had and what has been the result of that experience of commissioning out-of-hours services from commercial providers?

  Dr Rich: Prior to commissioning our new arrangements, we had none at all. We clearly had commissioning of ambulance services and commissioning of A&E services in hospitals, but the responsibility for choosing and working with out-of-hours providers and the legal responsibilities always stayed with practices prior to the introduction of the new GP contract, so although we have had a watching brief in terms of quality, because PCTs have had the right to say that a provider is not meeting minimum standards, we have not actually commissioned the service ourselves before this recent role.

  Q79 Mr Jones: So you have had recent experience but no past experience.

  Dr Rich: Our service now has been operational for about 18 months. All the skills around commissioning are very similar: business planning, value for money, service specifications. It is similar to what we do in other parts of the health service.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 6 August 2004