Select Committee on International Development Third Report


II. Examination of expenditure

26. DFID's Annual Report 2003 formed the basis for the evidence session with the Permanent Secretary.[20] The 2002 Spending Review announced an increase in DFID's budget to £4.6 billion by 2005-06 on the basis that there should be demonstrable improvements to the lives of the poorest people. We were concerned at the lack of a linkage between the additional funding provided and any assessment of an increase in what is delivered. We recommended therefore that DFID demonstrate the links between the funds secured and commitments made in the spending review and the performance which the Department records in its annual report.[21]

27. Financial flexibility is essential in an environment where risks as well as opportunities arise which DFID has to respond to but is not in a position to control or even influence—when dealing with financial crises for instance. We used the report to explore the department's risk management and its commitment to making use of financial flexibility in order to link funds with performance. So, for example, in Bangladesh the country team were able to move swiftly to support the government's reform programme in jute production, whilst in Tanzania, budget support was cut after the government decided to purchase a $40m air traffic control system.

28. We continued, as in previous years, to question DFID's use of direct budget support. Aid-receiving countries should not be overburdened with a range of different reporting requirements for donors. We were pleased, therefore, this year to note the work DFID is doing in conjunction with the NAO on building up the financial management and tracking systems in its partner countries. Recipient governments' performance management and accountability is the key to measuring the impact of budgetary support. We stressed to DFID that the assumed benefits of direct budgetary support may be worth the associated risks but careful monitoring and evaluation is needed to minimise the risks and maximise the benefits.


20   Op cit. HC 825 Back

21   Ibid Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 24 February 2004