Select Committee on International Development Fourth Report


4 A Global Push for Poverty Reduction

31. International development, as it is currently understood, is about a collective effort to meet the MDGs. Bilateral aid relationships are an important part of this collective endeavour.

32. DFID's draft Country Assistance Plan for Kenya sets out how DFID intends to support Kenya's Economic Recovery Strategy. The expectation is that successful implementation of this strategy will contribute to poverty reduction and progress towards the MDGs. In effect, the CAP sets out the role which DFID intends to play in partnership with the Government of Kenya.[41] Whilst the draft CAP does a good job in this regard, it could still be improved: the MDGs should be more prominent; DFID's plans and priorities should be explained as well as described, in part by reference to what other donors are doing, and where DFID's comparative advantage lies; and, it should set out more clearly a framework for monitoring Kenya's progress towards the MDGs and for evaluating the effectiveness of DFID's assistance. In short, DFID's CAP should be more goal-focussed, and should show more clearly how DFID fits into the wider picture of development and development assistance in Kenya. In this way, DFID's CAP for Kenya, and other CAPs following this model, would more accurately, and more helpfully, paint DFID's bilateral aid relationships as part of a wider picture.

33. The Africa Commission, announced earlier this year by the Prime Minister, has a real chance to inject momentum and urgency into the global push for poverty reduction in Africa.[42] It is an opportunity for the international community to reflect on what needs to be done for Africa to make progress towards meeting the MDGs, as well as to learn from the success stories that can be found in Africa. It also provides a forum in which donors and recipients can—in the spirit of partnership, mutual accountability and collective effort—learn about what makes for effective aid relationships. We recommend that the Africa Commission considers the value of, and mechanisms for, joint monitoring and evaluation by both donors and recipients. By making mutual accountability and learning a central part of aid relationships, the aid effort could be put on an upward spiral of increasing effectiveness,[43] and the delicate balance between local ownership and external accountability might be more easily achieved. Initiatives to increase the effectiveness of aid should go alongside equally important efforts to increase aid volumes, such as the Chancellor's proposed International Financing Facility. We welcome the Prime Minister's initiative in establishing the Africa Commission, and look forward to hearing more about its plans and to engaging with its work.



41   On development partnerships, see IDC, Fifth Report of Session 2001-02, Financing for development: Finding the money to eliminate world poverty, HC 785-I, paragraphs 82-92 (see footnote 36 for full reference). Back

42   Q 30 [Hilary Benn] Back

43   Tony Killick, 2004, "Monitoring partnership-based aid relationships: A note", Development Policy Review, volume 22, no.2, pp.229-234. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 12 May 2004