Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Wanjiku Kamau

  This evidence is submitted by Wanjiku Kamau. Wanjiku lives in the UK and is policy analyst in the area of health and development. She works as a consultant for several international HIV/AIDS organisations. The evidence is not presented on behalf of any organisation but in a personal capacity.

TESTIMONY

  I.  I welcome the recent invitation to submit written evidence to the UK Parliament's Select Committee for International Development on this important issue. I am happy to support this written testimony with oral evidence if the Committee deems it as necessary.

  II.  This enquiry comes at a good time. It is difficult to exaggerate how critical the years covered by the CAP are likely to be for citizens of Kenya. After years of mis-rule the people of Kenya are looking to the new government to bring in a new style of democratic and accountable governance that will lead the country out of the previous path of economic decline and a marked deterioration in the quality of life of most citizens.[17]

  III.  The priorities and actions of development partners such as the UK government at this time is likely to be critical in determining whether the current government is able reverse current trends and attain the millennium development goals and other human development targets. It is therefore encouraging the UK government and its institutions are considering carefully how to best support Kenya at this time.

  IV.  This submission limits itself to commenting on the Millennium Development Goals related to health. Specifically it refers to the following three health goals:

    —  Reduce under-five mortality by two-thirds of the 1990 level

  After many years of progress there is a worrying increase in the under-five mortality rate. Child mortality has increased from 97 in 1990 to over 125 deaths per 1,000 births in the year 2002. The trend is similarly discouraging for infant mortality which has increased from 63 deaths in 1990 to over 80 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2002.[18] Recent reports from GAVI also indicate worrying figures in the coverage of immunisation.

    —  Reduce maternal mortality by three quarters of the 1990 level

  The trend on this important target is also depressing. The maternal mortality ratio for Kenya (modelled estimate) is 1,300 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.[19] Perhaps more worrying is the fact that Kenya is experiencing a reduction in the percentage of births that are attended by skilled health workers. In 1990 it was estimated that 50% of births were supervised by a health worker that figure is now thought to be as low as 45% of births.

    —  Halt and reverse the spread of AIDS, TB and Malaria

  The incidence of HIV/AIDS in Kenya is growing and the increase is particularly pronounced in the 15-24 year group. It is also worth noting that there is a significant gender imbalance in the spread of HIV in this age group. A recent study noted that for every six new infections in 15-24 year old group, five are in girls. The number of children that have been orphaned by AIDS is also growing at a rate that is beyond what the government and communities can cope with. The incidence of tuberculosis is 485.5 cases per 100,000 people. Kenya continues to bear a very high burden of disease from these three diseases.[20]


V.  THE CONTEXT

    —  56% of the Kenyan population classified as absolutely poor—existing on less than Kshs 80 (US$1) a day—poverty emerges as the most formidable challenge for Kenya today.

    —  There is a high level of out-of-pocket financing for health care ie many of the poorest households in Kenya have to pay for health services as there is now a system of cost-sharing. Moreover the severe constraints on financing healthcare have contributed to poor quality services and to inequitable access.

VI  THE EFFORTS OF THE KENYA GOVERNMENT

    —  The new government of Kenya has re-affirmed its commitment to mobilising national efforts towards the attainment of the MDGs by 2015.

    —  As the draft DFID CAP recognises, the government has published and is implementing an ambitious Economic Recovery Strategy (ERS) which sets out the priorities of the government and identifies the policy orientation in key sectors. The ERS has identified the HIV/AIDS epidemic as a major challenge and identified measures to ensure an effective multi-sectoral response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

  In order to achieve the health MDGs the Government of Kenya (GOK) recognises that it needs to increase the access to health service for the poorest citizens.

  After broad consultation the current government included, in their manifesto, a pledge to establish a comprehensive health insurance fund.[21] The proposed fund is the government's response to ensuring that the poorest sections of the population can have access to quality health services.

  The Kenya government has published a sessional paper on the proposed fund and a draft bill will go through the parliament in the next parliamentary session.[22]

  The proposed fund will form a central plank of the government's health strategy and its multi-sectoral response to the growing HIV/AIDS epidemic.

  It is therefore difficult to understand how the DFID strategy is silent on the proposed fund as it represents the single most important health policy that the government will be taking forward in the years covered by the CAP.

  The failure to take into account a key element of government policy is out of step with DFID's statement to support nationally drivern development. There is a global consensus that process of achieving the MDGs must be country-led and must be attained through nationally driven development strategies, policies and programmes. It would be unfortunate if DFID failed to take into account key policy priorities and to consider how its contribution through the CAP can best strengthen, support and improve existing policy and help realise the goals of Kenya's democratically elected government and its citizens.

  It is my hope that the Committee will use the enquiry to seek clarification on whether DFID Kenya supports the principle of country-led development. It would appear that DFID have identified their own priorities in the health sector and are seeking to implement these outside of the existing policy framework put forward by the GOK.

March 2004





17   After years of commendable economic growth (average of 6.6% in the 1980s), in the past decade Kenya's economy has been characterised by poor economic performance. For the five year period 1997-2001, the economy experienced consistent decline. In the year 2000 Kenya registered its worst performance since independence (-03% growth). Back

18   World Development Indicators Database, Millennium Development Goals Kenya Country Profile. Back

19   World Development Indicators Database, Millennium Development Goals Kenya Country Profile. Back

20   The definition of "very high" disease burden is as follows: For HIV/AIDS: if the country's ratio of adult HIV seroprevalence (as reported by UNAIDS, multiplied by 1,000) to Gross National Income per capita (Atlas method, as reported by the World Bank) exceeds five. For tuberculosis: if the country is included on the WHO list of 22 high burden countries, or on the WHO list of the 36 countries that account for 95% of all new tuberculosis cases attributable to HIV/AIDS. For malaria: if the country experiences more than one death due to malaria per 1,000 people per year. Back

21   The proposed health insurance fund was endorsed by all political parties and is included in the manifesto of all registered political parties. In that sense it is clear that is has the support of the citizenry and broad support across the political spectrum. There is still need for policy dialogue and a need to build consensus on the precise kind of fund. Back

22   Sessional Paper on National Social Health Insurance, the National Social Health Insurance Fund Bill (clauses) and the Manifesto of National Rainbow Coalition are provided as annexes to this document. Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 12 May 2004