Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


APPENDIX A

CARIBBEAN/WEST AFRICAN—REGULATION AND INCREASING COMPETITION

  Those sending remittances to countries in this region may have been resident in the UK for 50 years (Jamaicans) and 20 years (Ghanaians/Nigerians). Traditionally, this sector has relied on small ethnic retailers who may offer money transfer as an ancillary service to other business activity (eg African food shops). These retailers may find themselves under pressure from new legislation to tackle money laundering which has tightened up the rules for money transfer. In 2001, the government passed new laws which required all UK money remitters to be registered with Customs and Excise. Many remitters in this market have still not registered and new, and even stricter, legislation has been coming into force from March 1st this year.

  By offering smaller ethnic remitters the chance to become registered Chequepoint money transfer agents, Chequepoint has provided these small businesses with a level of security around anti-money laundering compliance issues which they need.

  Furthermore, by a policy of cheaper prices and high reliability, Chequepoint has introduced levels of competition in to these more established money transfer markets, which has been appreciated by customers. One such example is the corridor to Ghana. By the end of 2003, Chequepoint had captured a 25% market share of remittances from the UK to Ghana. Chequepoint is the major remitter to Ghana.

EASTERN EUROPENEW MIGRANTS

  Potentially, the most explosive corridors in terms of potential growth are new migrants from Eastern Europe and the countries of the former Soviet Union (Poland, Hungary and Lithuania are good examples. These countries (and seven others) join the EU from June 2004 when permits will no longer be necessary to work in the UK. Apart from issues of reliability and commission charges, this group appreciate the opportunity to make remittances in cash or into bank accounts which Chequepoint offers. Those from Eastern European countries who remit money through Chequepoint are more likely to be employed in jobs areas where a high standard of English in not a pre-requisite (eg construction).

  The level of transfers to Poland is one measure of the dynamics within the former Eastern bloc in exporting migrant workers to the UK. Total transactions processed were 10,000 compared to 500 processed in 2002. This gives a year on year increase of almost 2000%.

  Chequepoint offers a service to key Baltic states such as Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, all of whom are joining the EU from May. The number of migrants from Russia and Ukraine, and hence the volume of remittances to these countries, is also significantly increasing. Overall, there was a very significant rise in number of transactions processed from the countries of the former Soviet Union in 2003 as compared with 2002.

SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE—SHORT STAY WORKERS BUT LARGER ONE OFF TRANSACTIONS

  The dynamic in the market to the southern hemisphere (South Africa/Australia) is different. Those who remit are likely to be relatively well educated younger people working in the UK on short stay visas. They may be employed in a diverse range of jobs: bar work, IT, teaching and local government, etc. One characteristic of this group is a tendency to send a single substantial bank transfer at the point of departure to their country of origin. This may be used for a deposit on a house purchase on their return.

  Traditionally, South Africans and Australians have tended to use the high street banks to send their transfers, but there is growing disquiet about the costs associated with this method.

  For example, through one of the major UK high street clearers, a bank transfer remittance of £100 may bring a fee of as much as £20 and there may be other charges made to the recipient by the bank in the country of destination. Chequepoint, by contrast, makes an up front charge of only £5. Overall, Chequepoint customers can pay 30% less in total commission charges than they would using a bank.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 8 July 2004