Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Maendeleo Ya Wanawake Organization

  I took note that the plan is now well refined. Your inclusion of "A comprehensive and effective response to HIV/AIDS with a particular emphasis" is very appropriate as we sometime fail to take into account the impact on Social and Economic Development.

  As I read the plan, I very much focused on its "Social and Economic impact", as this is what would make a difference in people's lives, particularly the poor. As I had stated previously, many fragmented projects could fail to achieve the total yield. £30 million is a lot of money, by any standards, but only if it is concentrated and not dispersed all over the place. Development with un-bridged gaps do not solve poor peoples problem in the long term.

  I am also glad to note your emphasis on infrastructure. If our water systems were improved, the poor would change their lives. If our roads and transportations system were sound, the poor would pull themselves out of poverty. If the energy sector were improved and functional the poor would benefit. Without improving these basic infrastructures, the poor, rural informal sector "Jua Kali" agriculturalist, fishermen etc cannot transport, sell their bananas.

  Infrastructure development opened our hinterland once before. It would do twice as much today.

  It is hard enough to address poverty, as it is but even harder if the poor are illiterate as well. This is one factor that has made it even harder to disseminate messages and educate the population on issues of HIV/AIDS pandemic.

  As you address ie "the culture of political and economic patronage", as a cause of corruption, you should look at both sides of the coin. Why does it creep in even to the donor-funded projects?

  I agree that financing of the ERS must depend heavily on Kenya's own resource—from revenues and natural resources—rather than donor-based dependency. Thus, the calls for the need to ensure accountability will therefore have to be a key theme running through all programmes.

  D3:  I agree that strict accountability is and should be expected from non-state actors as well.

  E2:  Civil servants have missed out on civic education and I suspect that they have not bothered to follow the on-goings in this process. They need to be educated and updated.

  Civic education should be introduced in schools and for the general public who missed out.

  E7:  This underscores my concern for access to water and I therefore take note of it with satisfaction. I have believed for the longest time that access to clean water is one of the most basic requirements for home healthy life and sanitation. It would automatically improve conditions of life.

  On Work Plan Section: Government should take tough action against "corruption". Should not classify "grand" or otherwise.

  Concentration of power and lack of checks and balances have been well addressed by the new constitution. However, non-state players must be enabled to educate people about the new constitution. Thus civic education should continue.

  High quality of essential services must be encouraged.

  Even as we promote "marketing bed sets," we should not lose track of also teaching people how to stop mosquitoes from reproducing, ie teach homestead cleanliness. Clearing of stagnant pools of water where mosquitoes breed.

Rose Arungu-Lende,

Executive Director

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 April 2004