Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence



Letter from the Ministry of Labour and Human Resource Development, Kenya, to the Head of DfID Kenya as part of DfID Kenya's Consultation on its Country Assistance Plan 2004-07

  I have studied the Draft Country Plan and have the following observations:

  1.  It takes cognisance of the Government's efforts in reviving the economy and empowering Kenyans for employment and job creation.

  2.  The entire Plan is hinged on the Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment Creation (ERSWEC) for 2003-07, its implementation as well as monitoring and evaluation; and identifies some major challenges that must be managed.

  3.  It is pro poor objectives; and design.

  4.  It identifies a clear role for Development Partners and proposes strong harmonisation of donor assistance through the use of Sector Wide Approach to programmes (SWAPs).

  5.  The plan addresses the key issue of delivery of assistance.

  With regard to the development of the micro and small enterprise sector, the Paper correctly recognises the need for improving the business environment and competitiveness in Kenya. The paper pledges support for the implementation of the forthcoming Sessional Paper, on the Development of Micro and Small Enterprises for Wealth for Poverty Reduction, as part of the private sector development strategy.

  Catalytic, MSE, development areas needing immediate attention, as stated in Kenya's interim Investment Program for the ERSWEC, include the following:

    1.  strengthening of financial institutions providing small business credit such as Kenya Industrial Estates;

    2.  developing the market for training small business entrepreneurs, preferably through demand incentive schemes;

    3.  strengthening vertical linkages within the industrial sector; and subcontracting arrangements; and

    4.  providing support in improving legal and regulatory investment climate.

  Critical areas needing serious attention in the implementation of the Draft Sessional paper are:

    1.  effective co-ordination of the sector's development in order to minimise wastage and build synergy;

    2.  re-focusing the Department of Micro and Small Enterprise Development (DMSED) to effectively co-ordinate the various MSE policy interventions and programmes, and to provide more facilitative and effective leadership to the sub-sector; and

    3.  intensifying stakeholder participation in building consensus on programmes and projects, and on their implementation, funding and co-ordination mechanisms, through the introduction of SWAP in the MSE sector development.

  I take this opportunity to express our appreciation for DIFD's intervention through funding, technical advice and facilitation of the various activities in the process of developing the draft MSE Sessional paper during 2003. We look forward to working together with you as we enter the implementation phase for the new MSE policy framework. MSE subsector needs to be assisted to play its role in the industrialisation process.

Deborah A Ongewe,

Permanent Secretary

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 April 2004