Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence



Letter from the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office) to the Head of DfID Kenya, as part of DfID Kenya's Consultation on its Country Assistance Plan 2004-07

  Thank you for contacting WWF Eastern Africa Programme Office to provide our comments on the Kenya Country Assistance Plan, 2004-07.

  WWF-EARPO commends DfID Kenya for an open and transparent consultation process with different stakeholders.

  The document recognises clearly that the environment matters greatly to people living in poverty. It affects their livelihoods and health and can increase their vulnerability to external shocks. This is well covered in the publication "DfID A guide to Environmental Screening—2003"[17]

  The Plan also recognises that developing countries are already experiencing environmental degradation and exhaustion of environmental resources that are vital to long-term development.

  However, there is limited recognition of the importance of environmental sustainability to achieving both poverty reduction and economic growth. This is a particular concern given the high dependency of the poor in Kenya on natural resources and that national economic growth will be based on growth in the agriculture and natural resource sectors. We would like to propose more emphasis on the following issues:

    —  Improving access to water and sanitation: we welcome the recognition that to achieve this there is a need to support improved water management and that this will be an area addressed through the PEAK programme. The Plan doesn't clarify what are the current challenges with regards to integrated water resources management (eg limited capacity in catchment management, illegal abstraction, poor land use management planning leading to erosion and siltation of rivers, etc).

    —  Economic growth based on agriculture and natural resources: we would like to suggest that investment in this area should look at ensuring that practices promote sustainable use of natural resources. The document already highlights that agricultural growth has been limited by the degradation of land resources and limited availability of water, perhaps this would suggest a need for a more integrated approach between the Ministry of Agriculture, Lands, Water and Environment to planning and policy development? However, the document only talks of supporting integrated policy development on land and agriculture. We would like to suggest broaden this to include other sectors. This could include sustainable use of natural resources and its contribution to poverty reduction at a localised level (eg WWF work on sustainable use of wood and fisheries management), and how this work has the potential to deliver wider benefits if some of the macro level challenges to scaling this up could be addressed.

  We would suggest that the following issues be incorporated:

    1.  A specific objective in the plan could be to "Strengthen the focus on environment in the National Economic Recovery Strategy (ERS)".

    2.  Amongst the cross cutting actions planned (eg increase in accountability of the Government to its citizens) increasing the integration of environment conservation in different sectors should also be a focus.

  Finally, we are encouraged that DfID will continue to support improved environmental governance through the PEAK programme. However, there are no clear mechanisms showing how this will be addressed during the implementation. WWF would be prepared to suggest some ideas on this.

  Thank you again for giving WWF the opportunity to comment on this important document. We take this opportunity to offer WWF input during the implementation of the Plan.

February 2004


Health—poor people suffer most when water, land and the air are polluted. Environmental risk factors are a major source of health problems in developing countries.

Vulnerability—the poor are often exposed to environmental hazards and environment-related conflict and are least capable of coping when they occur.

Source: DfID A guide to Environmental Screening—2003.


17   Livelihoods-poor people tend to be most dependent upon the environment and the direct use of natural resources. They are therefore the most severely affected when the environment is degraded or their access to natural resources is limited or denied. Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 April 2004