Select Committee on International Development Memoranda


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Dr G Eswaraiah, Director (Research), Centre for Social Development, Andhra Pradesh, India

I want to bring before you some gross weaknesses in the DFID donor, govt staff and local people. In the earlier e-mail I have indicated some issues by which the programmes had failed and the money was wasted. And people were misunderstood.

The Euro project for the tribal upliftment had also failed in the tribal Paderu, Visakhapatnam. But the project authorities did not hear me.

Since 1947, when only 10% of the total workers (mostly govt aided) had cornered out the budget

benefits, how can we establish equality and sustainability in income in the remaining 90% of the unorganized workers. The GDP and its growth rates of the Indian nation were being enjoyed by these 10% of the organized workers.

India needs large budget for the welfare services for poor widows, destitutes, disabled and the aged. The poor need special medical aid to reduce deaths. The burden of family pensions to the govt retired employees is very high, Rs 10,000 crores per year.

Now India is being fast desertified due to population explosion, devegetation, deforestation,

soil erosion and desertification. It needs large funds to establish plant nursery in every village for

green ecosystem.

Income from agriculture, animal husbandry, petty traders, artisans and forestry is decreasing since 1985. Even though immature mortality decreased and birth control measures increased at slow speed, the population size, low income, malnutrition, long dry period in the year(8 months), dowry, high marriage expenses and heavy dropouts(in schools and colleges), and staff corruption had reversed the income of the families.

The frequency of closing of industries is very high. But the remaining industries have no their original patents and licenses. Most of the patents of the industries are imported since 1947. So India gets less income from them.

DFID is an earlier British ODA and it has affection with Indian people after leaving India on 1947. But Indian civil servants are not trained but are working like British colonial staff.

Competitive exams and permanent jobs had heavily corrupted the performance of the staff at their jobs. Now every programme or admn govt staff is the first beneficiary and people are the last beneficiaries. Staff gets pay commissions, high salaries, DAs, increments, allowances, promotions, even travel bus passes (which were not allowed for the poor), leaves, bribes and family pensions. Govt treasury has become a choultry for the staff.

DFID, World Bank, Netherlands Assisted Projects,and voluntary donors (NGOs) German EZE, Bread for the World, SIDA, CIDA, IGSSS, CAPART, etc have to fund on 50% loan basis but not on 100% grant basis.

Before framing projects, govt secretaries did not consult private scientists to guide the projects and concerned depts with written instructions to collaborate. So there is no interdepartmental

co-ordination and universities consultancy.

The govt staff, distict collectors, civil servants, researchers, elected politicians and NGOs did not sit in the academic libraries for 100 hrs/year to get in contact wide literature.

The govt is getting now only one-fourth of the taxes. When every rupee is taxed the govt can get

large taxes for programmes and avoid taxes. As people say people's participation , then why

not staff participation ? Presently staff is making remote control sensors to supervise programmes without spending time with people everyday.

Now 90% population has low income and unstable income since 1947.

So these are my suggestions for the funding agency with 20 years experience.

April 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 21 June 2004