Select Committee on Unopposed Bill Committee on the Medway Council Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 33-39)

MR GAVIN ST JOHN WILDERS, Sworn: Examined by MR LEWIS

16 JUNE 2004

 33. MR LEWIS: Would you like to introduce yourself, Mr Wilders?

(Mr Wilders) Good afternoon. I am Gavin St John Wilders, aged 38 years. I am employed by Medway Council as the Head of Environmental Health and Enforcement and I co­chair an enforcement forum that was set up by the Leader of our Council to ensure that there was regularised enforcement throughout the Medway Council services and to make sure that there was increased enforcement throughout Medway. I qualified as an Environmental Health Officer in 1993 and have previously worked for both London and district authorities. I joined Medway in 1998 and during that time I have headed environmental health, but I also headed street scene services prior to that.

 34. MR LEWIS: Can you just explain to the Committee what wardens are and what they do?

(Mr Wilders) Part of my role involves managing the Medway Warden Service. It is a team of 22 enforcement officers whose main role is to provide a contract monitoring service to the Council's main contracts, those being the waste contract, highways and green spaces. The service operates on a ward basis and each ward is allocated its own warden. Historically each warden also has had responsibility for customer enquiries related to the service and for any environmental enforcement that was done in those wards areas such as fly-tipping. However, when I took control of the service it was apparent that the bulk of the workload was taken up by contracts monitoring issues and enforcement was suffering. To combat this we formed the Environmental Crime Action Team, which is a team of four enforcement officers, one senior warden and three wardens and they concentrate on environmental issues such as fly-tipping, abandoned vehicles and illegal street trading. It would be that team who would be enforcing the provisions of this Bill if it was enacted.

 35. MR LEWIS: Can you just paint a picture of Medway the area?

(Mr Wilders) Certainly. As has previously been mentioned, Medway is a unitary authority. It was created on 1 April 1998 by the amalgamation of two district authorities, those being the City of Rochester upon Medway and the Gillingham Borough Council. We have five distinct commercial centres throughout Medway, ie Chatham, Gillingham, Rainham, Rochester and Strood, each with their own town centres, and we serve a population of approximately 250,000 people. These centres represent an eclectic mix of both commercial tourists and historic activities. The three main areas where we have most of the activity out of the five are Chatham, Gillingham and Rochester and these attract visitors from all over the world to a number of high profile festivals, and Chatham town centre acts as the commercial centre for our borough. It is in these areas that the main activity around illegal trading exists and this leads to complaints from permanent traders about obstruction, noise and odour problems. Following consultation with town centre forums in these areas concerns were also expressed by these forums around issues such as unfair competition and the poor quality of the goods that were being offered for sale by the traders.

 36. MR LEWIS: Could you briefly describe how the street trading legislation has been implemented in Medway? Just briefly, there are different classes of streets which can be allocated by the Council under the Act: there are prohibited streets in which all street trading is prohibited and then there are consent streets and licence streets, which are streets in which street trading is prohibited unless the street trader has either a consent, in the case of a consent street, or a licence, in the case of a licence street. The Council can also choose not to designate a street in its area.

 37. CHAIRMAN: Do we need to know the difference between consent and licence or does it not make a difference in this case?

 38. MR LEWIS: It does not really make too much of a difference, but it will take ten seconds to answer the question.

(Mr Wilders) Within Medway we mainly have consent streets. The only streets that are prohibited ­ and they are listed in your bundle marked item 1 ­ are main thoroughfares, bus routes or other areas where we think there are street obstructions or busy thoroughfares where it would not be practical to have a consent street with people trading on it, which would include things like bypasses, major bus routes, dual carriageways and some high street areas that still have vehicle access to them.

 39. MR LEWIS: In Medway street trading is prohibited in those streets. Every other street in the borough, as I understand it, is a consent street. So street trading is only allowed with the consent of the local authority and with, of course, the pedlar's certificate exemption applying. Could you tell the Committee briefly about Chatham?

(Mr Wilders) Chatham is the main commercial centre of Medway and was given consent street status for the main High Street at a meeting of the full Council on 25 September 2002. The High Street is a pedestrianised area mainly of pre-war construction that provides a mix of commercial and residential occupations. Regeneration and development in the area has led to an increase in the number of pleasure activities such as pubs and restaurants that are located in the High Street and that extends the use of the High Street into the late evening. This area is the main shopping centre for the borough and attracts a number of flagship companies, for example Allders, Marks & Spencer and Next, and footfall is heavy and consistent throughout the week and is of a level comparable to a thriving city centre. The area was given consent street status to encourage lawful trading whilst controlling the retail mix of traders to ensure that the goods offered are of a similar quality and standard to those that are available from the permanent traders. However, at present there has only been one application for permission to trade and this is waiting to be determined.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 June 2004