Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 160-172)

14 JULY 2004

DR RICHARD CORBETT MEP, MR TIMOTHY KIRKHOPE MEP, MR CHRIS HUHNE MEP AND DR JOHN WHITTAKER MEP

  Q160 Sir Nicholas Winterton: You can obtain them any time because they are available.

  Mr Huhne: I would be delighted—I think it would be very useful to establish a list of British MEPs dealing with particular dossiers—to be sent material from the House and from the Lords relevant to that dossier in a timely manner. Nothing would make my life easier. That would be absolutely splendid. It has not happened yet.

  Q161 Mr Kidney: It has come out very clearly that we should study, if we want to improve our procedures, Denmark, Sweden, Finland—everybody says especially Finland—but no others.

  Mr Kirkhope: It would be interesting to see what the new member states are putting in place.

  Dr Corbett: I must confess I do not know the answer to that.

  Q162 Mr Kidney: I have only the slightest acquaintance with the procedures by which you conciliate and reach agreements.

  Dr Corbett: I can recommend a very good book on the European Parliament!

  Mr Huhne: You might even get an author's discount!

  Q163 Mr Kidney: In terms of your procedures, is that because you are secretive in the way that you reach those agreements so that we cannot scrutinise what you are up to or is simply that we are not taking an interest in something that is perfectly open?

  Dr Corbett: All our sessions and committee meetings of all committees are in public. The only parts of the legislative procedure that the European Parliament is involved in which is not in public is when we meet the Council in the Conciliation Committee. As you know, if we have not agreed the same text after two readings it goes to a Conciliation Committee to negotiate a compromise. That compromise then has to be approved by both—in public in our case, in a   public vote in Parliament. The Conciliation Committee, the negotiation of a compromise, is not in public.

  Q164 Mr Kidney: So we have plenty of opportunity to take an interest before you get to that stage anyway.

  Dr Corbett: Yes, and most legislation is agreed within one or two readings and does not need conciliation or a third reading.

  Q165 Sir Nicholas Winterton: What do you perceive to be the current effective links between the European Parliament and the Houses of Parliament here, ie the Commons and the Lords, the UK Parliament?

  Dr Corbett: My most frequent contact with MPs is through party channels, frankly. We also have a good link system with ministers because ministers are dealing in the Council with the same matters that we are dealing with in the Parliament and we have obviously reached the conclusion that we need to talk and communicate and co-ordinate positions.

  Mr Kirkhope: I think mine is probably through the party as well in many ways.

  Mr Huhne: Mine is definitely through the party and I think it depends very much on the MEPs. I make this point particularly about travelling via London because being a south-east MEP it is relatively easy to be here but that is not the case necessarily for someone from Scotland or whatever. I make an effort to participate in my party's treasury team meetings every so often to update them on what is going on in EU legislation and vice versa on the financial services area. I find that very useful; I hope they find it useful. I think it does depend on personal relationships.

  Q166 Sir Nicholas Winterton: Dr John Whittaker obviously does not have any of his party members in this House although he may well have a lot of sympathisers. How do you perceive the contacts between MEPs and the European Parliament? How will you seek to work with this Parliament in seeking to implement or to progress your agenda?

  Dr Whittaker: Our agenda—if I may state it—is to take Britain out of the European Union altogether in which case we would not be having this debate at all.

  Q167 Sir Nicholas Winterton: Bearing in mind we have the current situation, how would you seek to advance your agenda on behalf of your party which is the United Kingdom Independence Party?

  Dr Whittaker: United Kingdom Independence Party. I have told you what our ultimate objective is. Of course, we would be seeking to get members elected to this House as well and when we were able to exert sufficient influence we would be pressing the cause I have already mentioned to you. I do not quite get the thrust of your question.

  Q168 Sir Nicholas Winterton: How do you perceive, as a member of the European Parliament at this time, to improve the contact between the European Parliament so that members here are aware of what you and your party are seeking to do. We know your long term objective but there is quite a lot of time between what is going on now and what you might seek to do in the future. How would you seek to work now within the European Parliament to represent the interests of the people of this country and co-operate with the United Kingdom Parliament?

  Dr Whittaker: Our position in the European Parliament, in my opinion, gives us the position to fulfil the mandate for which we have all been elected, the 12 of us in the European Parliament now. I do not quite understand why you should see any relevance in our agenda of this Parliament here except to the extent that we would wish to have members in it in good time.

  Q169 Chairman: There is one other issue which I would be interested in your views on because there has been an issue about MEPs wanting greater access to facilities in Westminster. If so, which facilities and given the time constraints which you yourselves have raised—Chris has particularly identified—would anyone make any use of them?

  Mr Kirkhope: Obviously I am a former member as well so it is slightly different here, but in itself it is not a major issue but I think socialising. I know you have problems yourselves actually with your present MPs not socialising any longer due to your change in hours et cetera. I am just making a provocative statement there! I think there is nothing that you can do to help us and I think quite a lot of us actually do come through London and keep in touch with this place but we would be very pleased to see anything that could be done to improve the opportunities for socialising with MPs and colleagues here and therefore, for instance—it is a minor matter perhaps—but your dining and catering facilities and things like that are certainly an area where perhaps one might explore a little bit further and even possibly some other facilities, not necessarily your library but something which goes on here which might be useful from the point of MEPs clarifying the position of the British Parliament and what they are doing. I think that is a small matter but it all has a sort of atmosphere about it, assuming that MPs would be willing to agree to it.

  Q170 Chairman: I think you are allowed to use the members' dining room at lunchtimes but not at any other time. Do any of your colleagues have any views on this facility?

  Mr Huhne: I had not thought particularly about eating, MEPs do pretty well on that front in both Brussels and Strasbourg. But I do think if one is looking at the effectiveness of UK parliamentarians in dealing with legislation which affects us, then as I say—you will excuse me for being rather repetitive—the research facilities in the European Parliament are dire and if MEPs were actually able to use the Commons library on some matters I think that would be very helpful.

  Sir Nicholas Winterton: It occasionally takes members of Parliament many days to get papers from the library because they are so overstretched here.

  Q171 Chairman: That is another matter to discuss, I think.

  Mr Huhne: I think in practical terms if you want British MEPs to be well briefed on legislation that they are going to have to consider then I think improving their access to research into British interests is actually very useful.

  Q172 Chairman: Specifically the British interest?

  Mr Huhne: Yes. The Commons library does a very good job.

  Chairman: If there are any other issues that you, on reflection, think you would like to drop us a line about please feel free to do so. I just wanted to add that I think from all our points of view this has been a very educative and constructive session. I am very grateful indeed that you found the time to be here, each one of you. You have certainly given us a lot of food for thought in unscrambling this relationship. Thank you very much indeed for coming.







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 5 October 2004