Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 604 - 619)

THURSDAY 20 NOVEMBER 2003

MR MARK LEWIS AND MR JAMES DUFFY

  Q604  Chairman: Good morning. The purpose of this morning is to try and persuade you to put as much on the record as you told us off the record at that very interesting and revealing session that we had with you in Maghaberry and because we are sitting in private we will send you the transcript of what you say, and if you feel that there is anything you say which is particularly sensitive in nature which you would rather did not appear in the evidence you are free to suggest it to us and we will exclude it, but it is up to the Committee whether we do so or not. All this is to try and encourage you to be as frank as you possibly can. Forgive me if we ask you again some of the questions we asked you before. How do the staff feel about the implementation of separation now the decision has been made?

  Mr Duffy: Everybody we spoke to was of one voice, we were all against separation because of the lessons we had learnt from the Maze. We said that it was only a very small contingency, possibly 40 prisoners that were causing the problems and those prisoners should have been dealt with.

  Mr Lewis: In 2000 we shed approximately 40% of our staff. We explained to the remaining 60% we would normalise the Prison Service, we would create an environment of normality, the peace process had been going reasonably well up to then and the idea was to bring everything on-line with mainland GB. We increased staff training, we tried to create a regime where we could offer our presence as much as was being offered on mainland GB. Obviously there is a degree of dismay with the implementation of separation and segregation.

  Q605  Chairman: Do you think the new regime will contribute to the safety of prison officers and prisoners, as the Steele Report suggested?

  Mr Duffy: Personally, no, I do not. It will have problems inside, but the major problems we foresee will be outside. If we are given the necessary resources inside the prison and the control measures which we have seen in Bush House, which are excellent, we could handle it. Our problem when we move the prisoners from Bann 1 and 2 and Lagan 1 and 2 will be where they are at the moment for the temporary segregation. When they move in there, as we know from experience, they will not accept those conditions. They will more than likely attempt to assault staff. If we have the resources they will not succeed, not to the extent that they would expect. If they cannot get us inside then we are quite sure they will get us outside.

  Q606  Chairman: Do you think there is going to be an instant reaction when you move them in?

  Mr Duffy: Personally, no, maybe not an instant reaction because they need the numbers. If they are moving the Loyalists into a house then more than likely the action will be instantaneous because they do have a full house complement. What we are hearing from the Republicans at the moment is it is about 40. We have other Republicans in the prison that have just come to our notice since our meeting with yourselves that have raised concerns about their own personal safety.

  Q607  Chairman: Safety if they go into the separated regime or if they stay in the situation they are in now?

  Mr Duffy: The situation where they are now. They have raised concerns about their own safety. The problem we have now is the Republican prisoners who are in the like of Lagan 1 and 2 are of a different faction, they will not accept those prisoners coming onto their landing, so the Governor has a real problem.

  Q608  Chairman: Which faction is which?

  Mr Lewis: After the Good Friday Agreement there was a fragmentation of the mainstream paramilitary organisations within Northern Ireland: the Provisional IRA became the Continuity IRA, the Real IRA, the 32 County Sovereignty Committee, UDA, UFF, Orange Volunteers etc.

  Q609  Chairman: That we understand. It is a question of who is which in Lagan 1 and 2.

  Mr Lewis: This is what Mr Duffy means by factionisation. These people have formed their own quasi military units within the prison and they are even disagreeing with each other to a degree.

  Mr Duffy: The dissidents, the like of the Real IRA and Continuity IRA, they are the main ones that are in Lagan 1 and 2 at the moment.

  Q610  Chairman: Real and Continuity, are they getting on with each other?

  Mr Lewis: They will get along to a point to achieve the overall aim of their own separation.

  Q611  Chairman: They will co-operate, will they?

  Mr Duffy: In what they refer to as Stage 1. Stage 2 is when they move into either Bush or Roe. Stage 3 as far as we are concerned is when they will make their push for their own wings or possibly their own houses. At the moment in Lagan 1 and 2 we have 27 and 28 Loyalists separated at the moment.

  Q612  Chairman: And the 27 are Real and Continuity?

  Mr Duffy: Yes, sir.

  Q613  Chairman: You do not differentiate between the two?

  Mr Duffy: No, sir.

  Q614  Chairman: And they will go together into Bush or Roe?

  Mr Duffy: Yes. What we have received information on is that there are other Republicans—be they normal IRA prisoners or whatever, I am not sure—prisoners there who have voiced concerns about their own personal safety.

  Q615  Chairman: Who do they feel threatened by?

  Mr Lewis: The INLA, the Irish National Liberation Army and obviously loyalists.

  Q616  Chairman: How many of them are there?

  Mr Lewis: I am going to make a differential here. When a prisoner comes into prison we receive from the PSNI side in Northern Ireland a piece of paper that affiliates him to a paramilitary organisation, if he is a member of such an organisation. These people then come together and they recruit more members of their own organisations from their own communities within the prison, i.e. the Nationalist Roman Catholic community would recruit from the Nationalist Roman Catholic community and the UDA/UDF would recruit from the Protestant/Loyalist community. You can start off as we did, with 30, 40 or 50 and within a year you can effectively have 150 to 200 and this is the problem we have at the moment. What Mr Duffy is saying to you is that we have 30 to 40 of these people at the minute who we have segregated and they will be going into these houses. There are up to another 100 prisoners who are showing a keen interest in joining them because they can see that these people appear to be getting better conditions than the ordinary mainstream prisoner, which is worrying.

  Q617  Chairman: So it is that rather than any form of ideology or wanting to join anything that you think is the motivation?

  Mr Lewis: Yes, that is my perception.

  Q618  Chairman: It is not surprising since Bush and Roe are the best houses with the best accommodation.

  Mr Duffy: They have separated visiting areas which ordinary visitors see when they are coming in and they are going to the ordinary prisoner area, and the segregated prisoners refer to it as the "executive suite" and it is extremely plush compared to what everybody else is cramming into.

  Mr Lewis: We are currently using a room designed to hold 20 visiting tables and we are cramming 28 to 30 ordinary prisoners into this room and we are using a room with soft comfortable furniture, little partitioned off cubicles and a creche facility for maybe ten or eleven paramilitary prisoners at a time. So visitors coming in will look at this room crammed full of people, with children running about with nothing to do and they will see the comfortable executive suite where the paramilitaries go, where there are tea and coffee making facilities and a creche and nice seats.

  Q619  Chairman: Which does exist in the main visitors' area.

  Mr Duffy: No, sir, I am afraid not.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 11 February 2004