Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 700 - 719)

THURSDAY 20 NOVEMBER 2003

MR MARK LEWIS AND MR JAMES DUFFY

  Q700  Chairman: When do you think you are going to start the separated regime?

  Mr Duffy: They expect to be Bush and Roe very soon, by the beginning or mid February.

  Q701  Chairman: There is time to get the training done.

  Mr Duffy: There is time to get it done. How we are going to release those staff is going to be a problem, that is going to be another additional burden on us.

  Q702  Mr Bailey: From comments you have made it is fairly obvious that the Prison Service estate effects your ability to work properly. The Steele Review Panel found that it was inadequate in a number of ways, what would you say were the inadequacies of it?

  Mr Lewis: It is not big enough. Ultimately we need new build. The four old-style residential accommodations are falling into disrepair. The two new ones were built to hold a maximum capacity of 96 prisoners. A cell is smaller than the Home Office recommends for one prisoner in mainland GB. We are now talking about putting up to two prisoners in those cells. Over-crowding is creeping up on us.

  Mr Duffy: We have 676 prisoners in the prison today.

  Mr Lewis: There is talk, I say talk, because I have seen nothing substantive, that a K block will be built on the rear of the prison estate where the old prison gardens were.

  Q703  Chairman: What is a K block?

  Mr Lewis: A K block is a K shape configuration.

  Q704  Chairman: I suspected it was but I wanted to get that on the record.

  Mr Lewis: It is a bigger version of a H block. A full size K block can hold up to 300-325 prisoners.

  Q705  Mr Bailey: What is the advantage of a K block as opposed to a H block?

  Mr Duffy: More control. It is back to the old Victorian style, if you are in the centre you can look down the legs. The old style houses are square, subsequently you are very limited in your vision, you have officers working down either landing neither of them within sight of each other, neither can respond if there is trouble to back each other up. They are totally unsuitable. There is no camera coverage in the old ones. In Bush and Roe the work that has gone on is excellent, we are seeing an additional 40 cameras per house.

  Q706  Mr Bailey: That brings me on to my follow up question, in effect what steps are being taken? You have mentioned some, what other steps do you think could be taken?

  Mr Duffy: The Governor himself has said that he wants the segregated prisoners to be looked at as a prison on its own within the prison. There will be no movement from that area, he is looking for a new build for visits, for legal visits, video-link and chapel, church, within that area. All that still has to be built. He is also looking for five aside football fields if it is at all feasible to be built within that area and everything to be contained within there and 24 dog patrols everything. If he can do that and keep them all in that area he can hopefully run the rest of the prison as a normal prison.

  Q707  Mr Bailey: That is interesting. Presumably that would incorporate facilities that are not there for the other prisoners—

  Mr Duffy: That is 12 months down the road.

  Q708  Mr Bailey:—and, shall we say, further incentivise prisoners to go for paramilitary and political status.

  Mr Lewis: Precisely. A very worrying thing. If I was an ordinary prisoner who had been conforming and behaving and doing my sentence, getting my sentence in and I see people are getting better concessions, what I perceive to be better treatment, better visiting arrangements, not being made to go out to work like an ordinary prisoner, having more leisure time I am going to say to myself, "it is easier to get my sentence in an environment like that".

  Mr Duffy: The governor concurs with us, under no circumstances does he want the segregated prisoners to have a preferential regime to ordinary prisoners.

  Q709  Chairman: They do at the moment.

  Mr Duffy: They do at the moment. When he moves them into Bush and Roe he does not want that to be seen as a more favourable place to go than what ordinary prisoners have, that is why the tight control movement will not be attractive for ordinary prisoners to go in, they are able to go to work, which in Bush and Roe they will not be.

  Q710  Mr Bailey: A counterbalance factor would be that there would be more control of movement?

  Mr Duffy: There has to be, otherwise you lose control very rapidly.

  Q711  Mr Bailey: Going back to the start of the protests, these arise in the first place, as I understand it, as a reaction to doubling up in Bush and Roe. I understand in your submission you did put alternatives.

  Mr Lewis: We implored them not to do it.

  Q712  Mr Bailey: You put in alternatives. What has happened as a result of the alternatives that you put to them?

  Mr Duffy: Our alternatives were not taken on board in any shape or form. To create the separation they opened Foyle House, which is what we said that we could do without any expense on taxpayers' money. Because of the overtime we are paying £10,000 a week when that area is open. They opened the old committal landing because from 18 June 2002 we asked the governor what his contingency plan was for overcrowding. We said, "we are getting to a situation where if we are over-crowded we have no vacant space". One of the areas that needed to be reopened was the old committal landing, the governor has done that, to free space on Lagan one and two to put dissidents in. He has moved prisoners up on to Bann three and four, five and six to make space for dissidents on Bann one and two. The problem he has now is he has no vacant accommodation. The only vacant accommodation we have because of the closure of one house for security work is on Lagan one and two and Bann one and two, we have spare cells there.

  Mr Lewis: Recently we had a situation where approximately 90 ODCs as they are known within the prison system, Ordinary Decent Criminals, became so frustrated with what they perceived the paramilitaries were getting they wrecked about 90 cells in one residential house in frustration because they were being locked up all of the time to take staff away to man paramilitary areas. Quite a substantial amount of damage has been done. If they keep doing this we have nowhere to house people, we simply have nothing left to fall back on.

  Q713  Chairman: We were told at one stage, and I would like your view on this, whilst the separation has happened in Bush and Roe if those house are not full, which they will not be, the Governor—

  Mr Duffy: We will have severe accommodation problems

  Q714  Chairman:—will put ordinary prisoners in there.

  Mr Duffy: He said that he is not going to do that.

  Q715  Chairman: Has he said that now?

  Mr Duffy: Yes, he has. He also said that remand and sentenced will not be on the same landing, they will be on separate landings.

  Chairman: That is news, that is a change from what we were told. Okay. If that has changed that is good.

  Q716  Mr Bailey: I have problems insofar as I was unable to make the visit to Maghaberry so I do not have a mental picture. Forgive me if I say something that seems to be a bit silly, going back to the sequence of events, the initial protests were about doubling up.

  Mr Duffy: Yes.

  Q717  Mr Bailey: Following the impact of those protests the paramilitaries saw the potential for pursuing a stronger agenda?

  Mr Duffy: The agenda had been going since April 2001, it was not just doubling up in Bush and Roe, it had started and all of the signs were there from April 2001, it was on their own website.

  Q718  Mr Bailey: In effect would it be reasonable to say that if your proposals had been adopted to prevent doubling up this whole process may not have been even started or at least would have been retarded.

  Mr Lewis: That would not be an unfair conclusion, sir.

  Q719  Mr Bailey: What reasons did they give for not adopting the proposals that you put forward?

  Mr Duffy: None.

  Mr Lewis: They simply said no.

  Mr Duffy: In our submission you have the minutes of the meetings.

  Mr Lewis: It is all in your folder. There was no reasonable explanation given, just "we are not doing that".

  Mr Duffy: One of the things we said was about additional staff being required and training being stopped, they have had to stop training now.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 11 February 2004