Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220-228)

MR PADDY MCINTYRE, MR STEWART CUDDY AND MR COLM MCCAUGHLEY

27 APRIL 2004

  Q220 Chairman: And then be treated as a homeless case.

  Mr McIntyre: Again, this is where the new legislation comes into play. This has happened to somebody in one of our offices locally. They were displaced—and we were satisfied to that extent, which we have always got to be—because they had been behaving anti-socially, in which case we could disqualify them from the waiting list. I would need to know the individual circumstances. We have done it with an applicant who walked in our door presenting himself as homeless and said "I have been homeless because I was joyriding on an estate" and we disqualified him from being homeless under the legislation.

  Q221 Chairman: I do not think in this case I will make judgment as to whether or not there was or was not anti-social behaviour. It is a very fine balance.

  Mr McIntyre: Absolutely. One man's anti-social behaviour is another man's "I do not like your political thoughts" or whatever.

  Q222 Chairman: Exactly, thank you.

  Mr McIntyre: We have got to be very careful. It is also ripe for a judicial review.

  Q223 Mr Pound: Do you make determinations on the grounds of intentionality?

  Mr McIntyre: I think legislation that we have got under the Housing Order allows us specifically to disqualify under that particular piece of the Housing Order rather than under the homelessness legislation.

  Q224 Mr Pound: I was wondering which line you were taking.

  Mr McCaughley: It overrides the intentionality clauses in the homelessness legislation and, as such, is tailored to Northern Ireland's requirements. There are a significant number of cases already where we have actually disqualified them.

  Q225 Mr Pound: Gentlemen, our Chairman has betrayed a distressing tendency to try to get advance copies of your report and I have no intention whatsoever of following him down that acquisitive path. However, your Promoting Social Inclusion working group on homelessness was set up last year and they must be due to report fairly soon. Can you let us know where you are?

  Mr McIntyre: I sort of think I can dodge this one, Chairman, in the sense that the Promoting Social Inclusion group is actually a group chaired by the Department. The Housing Executive is actually on that particular group, along with other Government departments and statutory agencies. My understanding is that it is likely to be reporting some time over the next couple of months. We are a member of that particular group rather than being the lead on it. We believe that it is complementary to our homelessness strategy, which I am quite happy to let you have a copy of.

  Chairman: I would not like to ask you for a copy but, of course, if one comes our way that would be very helpful.

  Q226 Mr Pound: Could I just ask a final question about the Northern Ireland Tenants Action Project. It has been said that given the presence of, for example, the Department for Social Development, the Housing Executive, and the Northern Ireland Federation of Housing Associations on the management committee of NITAP that the assistance provided is not wholly independent.

  Mr McIntyre: I know that you are seeing NITAP at some stage and I guess they are the best judge of that. We fund NITAP along with the Department and, for that reason, both the Department and the Housing Executive have representation on their management board but in terms of hands-on, day-to-day operation of NITAP, I frequently go to meetings where NITAP are sitting on the other side and have views that I might not necessarily agree with. I would not accept that at all. At an operational level they are wholly independent. Our engagement with them is at board level because we fund them. To make sure our funding is well spent we, along with the Department, carry out a review of NITAP every three or four years to make sure that it is doing the job and it has satisfactorily passed those tests. I would not accept that but I would be interested to hear what NITAP said.

  Q227 Mr Pound: What other mechanisms do you have for listening to the voice of tenants individually or collectively?

  Mr McIntyre: We have a Housing Community Network which represents something in the order of 450 community groups around the Province. It builds up from the bottom where there is a tenants' association at the local estate level. Our manager would have a local consumer panel which is built up from that representation which advises the manager on the local office business plan, the performance of the office and so forth. That builds up to a central level where there is a central Housing Community Network which we use very extensively for policy development and, again, that is extremely successful. We have done a lot of work on capacity building for the voluntary sector out there and on a quarterly basis we also carry out continuous omnibus surveys which give us a feel for what the public think about the services the Housing Executive are delivering.

  Q228 Mr Pound: Are they published? I am not asking for a copy of it.

  Mr McIntyre: They are, yes.

  Chairman: Mr Pound's last question was known in the trade as a teaser because, as you know, we shall be speaking to the Tenants Action Project next. Gentlemen, can I thank you for the evidence you have given and, once again, thank you both for your hospitality and the way that you have responded to requests from the Committee. We are very grateful and we appreciate the time that you have put in.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 26 October 2004