Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 229-239)

MR MURRAY WATT AND MS HILARY KYLE

27 APRIL 2004

  Q229 Chairman: Ms Kyle, Mr Watt, you are very welcome. We noticed that you were watching us from the back of the public gallery so you will not be surprised, therefore, that our first question is similar to the last question we asked the Housing Executive. The presence of the DSD, the Housing Executive and the Federation of Housing Associations on your management committee may lead some to say that there is a lack of independence within the project. How would you answer those criticisms?

  Ms Kyle: Not to contradict what our colleague has already said to you, we would say that our track record speaks for itself in that first of all, yes, the Department, the Housing Executive and the Federation are represented on our management committee, however we do have community representation on that committee as well. There are three members drawn from the Housing Community Network as was briefly explained. Our strategic plan where we are subject to three year review, we have just finished that review in fact, includes not only interviews with Housing Executive staff but with community staff as well and they drew the same conclusion as they have done in previous years, that we continue to provide an independent role. We do not have a hidden agenda, when we go to work with any community group we are working to the community's agenda and we ensure that they consult with the wider community. We are very open about what we do. We agree with every district office every year what groups we are working with and what areas we are going to be working with within that district. We act as an independent broker in that we are trying to explain to the community groups exactly the policies and procedures that the Executive and other bodies have in place, but then also trying to explain their needs to the bodies and, indeed, the Housing Executive. It was interesting to hear that on occasions we are seen to be on the other side of the fence as opposed to being in the middle. Just recently we pulled together some research from surveys that we do with our groups on an annual basis. There are 450 groups working with the Housing Executive on a regular basis and we would have something in the region of 580 who we would be providing advice to on a different level. When we carried out research of the groups we are working with on a regular basis, the majority came back and said that we did continue to provide that independent role. As I said, we really do feel that our track record speaks for itself and that we do provide an independent role.

  Q230 Chairman: You have mentioned your 450 groups related to Housing Executive properties, does that mean that most of your work is focused on Housing Executive tenants? Could you talk us through the work that you do with other sectors?

  Ms Kyle: Certainly. Maybe if I can just explain briefly as an overview what we do and then we can look at what groups we are working with. Our mission statement is to achieve meaningful community participation in the social housing sector by developing groups and promoting effective involvement. Our origin goes back to the 1970s from a project in Ballymena and it grew from there. We have a staff of 20 people in the organisation with 11 of those being field workers throughout Northern Ireland and we also have specialist staff as well. Because we are funded from the Housing Executive and DSD, yes, our work in the main would be with community and tenant groups. We would not always say it is tenant groups because within estates compared with the house sales there are a number of owner-occupiers on the estates and we would work with the entire community as opposed to just the tenant reps. Recently we undertook a pilot with one housing association and that was presented to the Federation for consideration. However, we would not have the resources to be working with housing associations in the same sort of role that we are doing now and if that was going to be pursued then we would obviously have to look for the resources to back that up. We provide not only funding and information, we provide training courses and support to the groups throughout the Housing Community Network. If I can briefly explain what that is. The Housing Community Network is a unique framework of the Housing Executive, of which other organisations would be quite envious. They have a method of engaging with the tenants and the community reps throughout all stages. Every community group within Northern Ireland who have any comings and goings with the Housing Executive are able to elect two representatives to attend what is called a district Housing Community Network and they meet with district staff to look at district issues. They do not look at individual issues; there is a separate mechanism for dealing with that. In turn, they elect representatives to attend an area meeting looking at budget programmes, schemes, and meeting with the area staff. In turn they elect three people to sit on what is called the central Housing Community Network and they meet with people like our colleagues who were here this morning, they meet with assistant directors on a regular basis. They meet monthly. Really they are used as a consultative forum for the Housing Executive. We would have a central role in supporting that sort of work as well.

  Q231 Chairman: You have described a system which reaches out far beyond simply rented housing tenants, similar perhaps to some of the area committees that local government has created within GB. Does that mean that you are providing a service that perhaps is missing from the general provision of community services within Northern Ireland, do you believe?

  Ms Kyle: We would always say that we add value to what is already there. There are plenty of other providers of support and what we try to do is complement what is happening as well rather than duplicating.

  Q232 Chairman: But focusing on housing?

  Ms Kyle: Focusing on housing in so much as housing is not an island. Our colleagues this morning, I think, indicated a number of other projects that the community and tenant reps would be involved with. Our role would be very much to support them on these working groups, like the health action zones, fuel poverty and all those sorts of things.

  Mr Watt: Maybe I could just add something. One additional element to that is that we are very much in support of what district housing staff in the Housing Executive are being asked to do as their particular agenda has been broadening in the role and their responsibilities, whether it is community safety, community relations, urban renewal or neighbourhood renewal. The work they are doing with Government community groups, I think we are very much in support of that. Our agenda and our expertise has broadened as a consequence, so that is why it is perhaps a bit broader than simply the public sector housing tenants.

  Q233 Chairman: Do you have geographical coverage across the whole of Northern Ireland?

  Ms Kyle: We do indeed. We work with community groups through every district office. Every district office, in fact, has one of these district Housing Community Networks and we are represented on every one of those as well. We would have a very close working relationship with the districts and the staff, the fieldwork staff on the group. We meet annually, me, them and the district manager, to agree what we are doing in the areas so those relationships are cemented.

  Chairman: Excellent.

  Q234 Mr Luke: Following what the Chairman has been asking, are you satisfied with the input tenants and communities have into the current methods for determining the need for social and affordable housing?

  Mr Watt: I think one of the things that we hear frequently at district Housing Community Network meetings is probably the fact that tenants and community reps feel that they are not as involved as they might otherwise be. I think the determination of housing need is a fairly complex and sometimes bureaucratic mechanism. When it comes down to the level of local communities, I think the dividing line between what is need, what is aspiration and what is demand is a lot more blurred than perhaps would be the case in official circles. I think as well that when we look at the urban and the rural geography of Northern Ireland it is a very, very complicated arena. I think the housing market being as segregated as it currently is causes stresses and strains at local levels which sometimes are not reflected in housing needs assessment. I think even within communities themselves there are divisions which impact on housing need and sometimes these require local housing managers to step outside the box to address those issues. There has been quite a lot of reference to the net stock model which has been geared towards identifying the bigger picture, the larger scale. It probably is not geared up for identifying local need but there needs to be some mechanism that does do that and does do that perhaps with a bit more openness and a bit more transparency.

  Q235 Mr Luke: Your comments almost confirm the views expressed to us when we visited and travelled around some of the areas of Belfast during our last visit. Have you any idea what kind of model could be put in place to improve that input?

  Mr Watt: One of the mechanisms which the Housing Executive uses is the District Housing Plan which is produced on an annual basis for each of the 26 district council areas. I think one of the things which perhaps could be a useful addition would be to extend the actual purpose, the actual scope of the District Housing Plan by involving the local elected representatives, local voluntary housing sector, local communities in drawing up the plan rather than simply just responding to it. I think a plan which had more input would have more ownership and probably would be a more accurate reflection of what people understand housing need to be within that locality. Certainly I would encourage a greater and an extended role for the District Housing Plan planning process which would be more inclusive and, as I say, people would have more ownership of it and have more commitment to it.

  Q236 Mr Hepburn: Do you think housing associations are capable of providing social housing in high demand areas?

  Mr Watt: That is probably a question best answered by the housing associations themselves. There is no doubt that the housing association movement right across the UK, but particularly in Northern Ireland, has done an excellent job in providing the type of accommodation that no other provider could either in the public or the private sector. I think there are—and this Committee no doubt has heard plenty of evidence—plenty of views with regard to the difficulties facing the housing associations building in high demand areas, whether it is the cost of land, whether it is land availability or site availability, whether it is the planning processes or competition for development. I think all of these things probably mitigate the voluntary housing sector but there is no doubt that they certainly have a large commitment to providing the general needs housing now that the new build responsibility has been handed on to them.

  Q237 Mr Hepburn: What do you think the Government can do to meet housing targets? Do you think possibly one option would be to return the new build programme to the Northern Ireland Housing Executive?

  Mr Watt: I will take that second question first, if I may. I do not know if it is realistic to return the new build responsibility to the Housing Executive either in whole or in part. Certainly our experience of what we are hearing at the district Housing Community Network is that perhaps it would be desirable either in whole or in part. I think on the actual question of what Government can do, there is probably a bit of scope for a lot more creative thinking in terms of facilitating the voluntary sector within high demand or difficult areas. I recall a number of years ago attending a conference in Dublin and one of the local TDs was offering a number of views with regard to how they would see the voluntary housing sector movement having more input and more contribution on the land in and around Dublin. Whilst these figures are most definitely out of date and probably inaccurate, I will now quote them just to give you an illustration. Agricultural land in Northern Portmarnock on the outskirts of Dublin was about, what, £30,000 an acre. If it had been rezoned to housing it would probably increase to about three-quarters of a million pounds per acre. One of the things that was suggested was that by using the tax system you could tax that capital increase to the extent—

  Q238 Mark Tami: Can I just interrupt, how much did you say it was worth an acre?

  Mr Watt: £30,000 of agricultural land because it is quite poor—

  Q239 Mark Tami: £30,000 an acre.

  Mr Watt: I think it had been translated for us in the north at that particular time and from euro to sterling.

  Mr Pound: A startlingly high figure for agriculture.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 26 October 2004