Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 420-435)

RT HON JOHN SPELLAR MP, MR DAVID CROTHERS AND MR JEROME BURNS

30 JUNE 2004

  Q420 Reverend Smyth: That is to be welcomed, because there is always the possibility of ex-Northern Ireland Housing Executive stock sold to the tenant and sold on to the private sector. They do not normally follow through with the same degree of oversight as the public sector has done. In that connection, is there any evidence to suggest that housing benefit is supporting high-quality private rented sector accommodation at the expense of good-quality public sector accommodation, or even the reverse: supporting poor private sector accommodation at the expense of good-quality public sector accommodation?

  Mr Spellar: There is quite a movement backwards and forwards, and there is some evidence of tenants leaving social housing to enter private sector accommodation. Some of that will also be stimulated by crackdowns on anti-social behaviour in housing association and Housing Executive properties. That is why I referred to the need to keep control of that sort of behaviour within the private rented sectors as well. By the way, this is not a problem unique to Northern Ireland. Colleagues around the table probably experience similar problems in England, Wales and Scotland—that these are, much more broadly, problems on estates. However, we are doing some work to look at that and also to look at the relationship between the private rented sector and the social security system. We will also be doing some case studies on it. I will be taking a keen interest, and I will be happy and indeed keen to share that with the Committee in the future. The other area we have to look at is the extent to which housing benefits to private rented accommodation is firming up, buoying up or over-stimulating the private sector market as well. I am talking about the house price levels and the extent to which that might be underpinning it. I think that we will need to be examining that—which ties in with the original basis of your question.

  Q421 Reverend Smyth: I certainly welcome the realisation that we are the same sort of people. Sometimes we think that Northern Ireland is different from everywhere else, but it is a reflection of the whole nation in that sense. There is one difference, of course. It has been suggested that in areas such as protection-for-tenancy deposit schemes, and the use of a housing health and safety rating system, the Northern Ireland legislation is weak compared to that introduced in England and Wales. What consideration has been given to strengthening the legislation in Northern Ireland in these areas?

  Mr Spellar: We do not have any immediate plans to adopt the system, I have to say. We are currently monitoring the situation in England. We will make an evaluation of it. In the interim, however, the Housing Executive has been asked to carry out a number of pilot exercises to determine the potential impact of the system on the grants budget. That is on the housing, health and safety rating system. On the tenancy deposit schemes, at present two schemes are operated by the voluntary sector provide assistance for homeless people and people accommodated in hostels, to enable them to obtain housing in the private rented sector by acting as guarantors. However, there are no plans to introduce legislation in this area at the moment.

  Q422 Mr Luke: Moving to the planning side, what difficulties have been identified in relation with the use of the planning system? For example, application of Article 40 to encourage or require the delivery of sufficient numbers of affordable and social housing in Northern Ireland?

  Mr Spellar: I will pass this to one of the officials.

  Mr Burns: We cannot necessarily speak for The Planning Service, because it belongs to a different department. Let us just say that the planning system—indeed, the very concept of having a planning system—will have an impact on affordability and house availability. Any system that restricts or places restrictions on where a development can take place, how large or how small that development can be, or the levels of density there can be within that development, will always have an impact on affordability. The Planning Service, and the Department for Regional Development that determine planning policy, takes account of the impact of any proposals it may have on affordability, but it also has to look at the wider picture—the impact of development on the environment and on other such issues—and there will be times when these two will conflict. The Department for Regional Development is currently working on Planning Policy Statement 12. That is seen as the mechanism for delivering affordable housing in the future. They are still working on that. There is a bit of difficulty between the Department for Regional Development and the Department for the Environment, because it will be the department ultimately that will have to have the operational responsibility for the policies that DRD has in PPS12. But we and the Housing Executive are both working together with DRD in order to try to ensure that, when PPS12 is finalised, it has an appropriate mechanism in it—to deliver more land for affordable and social housing.

  Q423 Mr Luke: Much has been made of the PPS12 and I know there has been a delay in this. Do you not feel that the failure to deliver it so far will have a negative effect on the delivery of social and affordable housing?

  Mr Burns: Needless to say, we in our department would like to see PPS12 out as quickly as possible, because we do see it as a facilitator in helping to deliver affordable housing. I cannot say anything more, other than that we are working with the DRD in order to try to make sure that they can meet their timescale on it.

  Q424 Mr Luke: There has also been this question of the delay in delivering, or the further slippage in delivering, the area plan programme, which many people see as a very useful tool.

  Mr Spellar: You mean the Belfast area plan?

  Q425 Mr Luke: Yes. Is that also causing you concerns? Is that acceptable delay?

  Mr Spellar: My colleague, the DoE Minister, is committed to producing the plan in the late autumn, but I think that we have to recognise some of the complexities. There is a high level of objections, as you might imagine. It covers about 700,000 people. It is six district councils and it is 38% of Northern Ireland's population. It is not an insignificant undertaking. It covers a well developed area, and one in which there is a considerable number of already established interests. It is one which will inevitably create quite a bit of controversy and attention. However, we are moving on with it and we do hope to produce that in the autumn.

  Q426 Mr Luke: This may be a question for another department, but is there a risk that developments in planning policy might reduce the availability of affordable housing for first-time buyers and thus increase the demand for social housing programmes?

  Mr Spellar: That is a danger with planning policies anyway, depending on what priority is given; also, quite simply, how much land is available for housing and therefore whether more expensive housing can tend to bid up the prices for that housing. It is one to which we are very much alert. You will remember that, earlier in my evidence, I was referring to the requests from a whole number of local authorities to increase the allocation of land for housing, because they recognised that pressures on land were leading to rising prices, and that was feeding through to the house price market. They were concerned about the ability of their communities to sustain growth and, at the same time, the ability of youngsters to stay in the area in which they had grown up. So I think there is a recognition of that, and these planning policies are obviously an intrinsic part of it.

  Q427 Chairman: Minister, you kindly reminded us earlier that your responsibilities cover both DSD and DRD. Is this one of those areas where we could ask you to use your influence or to help to get an earlier release of PPS12? Certainly throughout this inquiry there have been many comments saying, "It will be very beneficial, but we want it soon".

  Mr Spellar: I will consult the Minister responsible.

  Q428 Reverend Smyth: I have always hesitated to deal with constituency issues in these circumstances, but twice the Minister has referred to south Belfast. We have a situation, in an area where there is a cry for social housing, where the Housing Executive owns the land, and where we understand that a rebuild, replacing high-rise flats—which were a source of problems—would not be blocking out the other Housing Executive houses. Despite those undertakings, there is a planning scheme going ahead which is going up to eight storeys. They have managed to placate one resident by bringing it down to a lower level to just, as we say in Ulster, the "forenest" house. Surely where there is a requirement for affordable housing, the Housing Executive should not necessarily be selling it off to private developers to make a packet out of it, irrespective of what happens to people?

  Mr Spellar: This is a slightly vexed situation, as Reverend Smyth knows. Indeed, the first developer actually fell out of the scheme after he had started it. I have had representations, as he is aware, from the residents and the local MLA. He will also know that I have been instrumental in arranging a meeting between the Housing Executive and the MLA to deal with this, and I think that there are further discussions taking place. I think that it is probably better that I do not go much beyond that in this response, but this matter has been very forcibly drawn to my attention, and indeed we have been getting discussions to take place to try to resolve them.

  Reverend Smyth: I would have got my knuckles rapped if I had not raised it!

  Q429 Mark Tami: Turning to standards, who is responsible for setting standards for new build social housing, particularly in respect of issues such as sustainability and energy efficiency?

  Mr Spellar: We have been monitoring the work of the Sustainable Buildings Task Group, and they have not yet developed a code for that. In Northern Ireland it is the Department of the Environment's Environmental Policy Division that is tasked with developing policy and drafting legislation on a broad range of environmental issues, and which takes the lead in implementing a code for sustainable building when it will be developed—but obviously in consultation with other departments.

  Q430 Mark Tami: The code for sustainable building has been adopted in GB. Are you looking at just moving that across, or do you think there is something that needs to be different?

  Mr Spellar: I understand that the Sustainable Buildings Task Group's report was launched on 17 May this year. It recommended the production of a unified code for sustainable building, to bring together best practice and to raise standards, and also the formation of a joint venture body to develop and establish that code.

  Q431 Mark Tami: Are you looking at extending the Lifetime Home Standard to the private sector in Northern Ireland? If you are, what impact do you think that will have?

  Mr Spellar: This sounds like "pass the parcel", does it not? This is the responsibility of the Department of Finance and Personnel, who have responsibility for building regulations. What they intend to do is review the building regulations for Northern Ireland in 2005. I am advised that consideration of the Lifetime Home Standard will be included in this. Our department has supported and stimulated debate in this area, organising and contributing to conferences on this subject. Frankly, we would welcome the extension of the Lifetime Home Standard to private sector housing.

  Q432 Mark Tami: Taking on board the potential for the need for adaptations, which could have quite an impact?

  Mr Spellar: I think that the code itself would be for new build or for major refurbishment. I look for reassurance on that.

  Mr Crothers: New build in this instance?

  Q433 Mark Tami: Yes.

  Mr Crothers: All our social housing is built to Lifetime Home Standard. We are certainly encouraging the private sector to go down that route, because we are aware of the cost of adapting a new build house to Lifetime Home Standard is only between £200 to £500 or £600.

  Mr Spellar: When it is built in the initial stages. It is the retro-fitting costs on existing buildings which can be quite substantial. That is why we introduced it, I think in 2001, as the basic standard for all the new developments to be undertaken by housing associations; but we also believe that it would be of benefit for private sector housing.

  Q434 Chairman: It would certainly be a huge boost to Northern Ireland's disabled community, who raised this with us very recently. At the moment, they see the choices as being restricted, and an extension of the Lifetime Home Standard to the private sector would give them far more confidence in being able to have the same choice.

  Mr Spellar: I think it is also worth putting on record, Chairman, that it is estimated that about £30 million a year is spent annually on adapting property in Northern Ireland—reinforcing the point that retro-fitting, as in almost every other form of building, is far more expensive than designing in at the initial construction stage.

  Q435 Chairman: We have moved on very well, but I still have one question that I want to put to you, Minister. That is in respect of interaction in the housing market between Northern Ireland and the Republic. The Committee was recently in Derry and the overspill for Derry, as you would expect, now takes in quite a large area of County Donegal. What consideration has been given to that interaction of the housing markets between Northern Ireland and the Republic, and what impact will it have on your policy?

  Mr Spellar: It is certainly true to say that in both jurisdictions there has been a considerable increase in house prices. For example, one of the issues that led me to issue the consultation paper about building in the countryside, single unit developments, was precisely an easement on regulations in the Republic of Ireland, which undoubtedly also has an echo in Northern Ireland. While it has been limited in terms of cross-border movement of local markets interacting, equally it would be fair to say that this has been developing. I was in an office in Derry on Monday and one of the senior officials there was saying that they had recently moved, and they were a quarter of a mile into Donegal. Particularly as transport, notably road transport, is improving, I think that we are seeing a greater increase, and that we are likely to see a greater increase—but I would not want to overemphasise it either.

  Chairman: Minister, the division bell has come at a time when we had just completed our questions. So may I, on behalf of the Committee, thank you for answering our questions this afternoon. I am sure that the answers will be very helpful to us in compiling our final report.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 26 October 2004