Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Fifth Report


Introduction


1. On 12 February 2004 the Committee announced an inquiry into 'Hate Crime in Northern Ireland'.[1] The terms of reference for the inquiry were to:

Explore the reasons for the reported increase in crimes and incidents motivated by hatred within and between the communities of Northern Ireland

To examine the effectiveness of measures taken by Government and relevant agencies to tackle prejudice, and to support the victims of such prejudice; and

To assess the effectiveness of the existing law and proposed changes to that law.

2. On 9 February 2004 the Government had published its proposal for a draft Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 which contained 'proposals to deal with crimes based on hostility of race, sectarianism and sexual orientation'.[2] The Committee took oral evidence on these 'hate crime' aspects of the Government's draft Order on 12 May.

3. We understand that the Government intends to lay the draft Order in Parliament in the next few weeks with a view to it passing into law by the end of July 2004. This brief interim report sets out our views only on the 'hate crime' measures set out in the draft Order.[3] We intend to report more fully on the wider aspects of our inquiry later in the year.

'Hate crime' - a growing problem

4. 'Hate crime'—crimes based on hostility of race, sectarianism and sexual orientation[4]— directed towards any group is abhorrent in a civilised society. The Committee received evidence that crime motivated by race, religion, and sexual orientation is a substantial and growing problem in Northern Ireland. For example, according to the Government, the rate of racial incidents in Northern Ireland in 2001/02 was 12.9 per 1000 of the minority ethnic population compared with 6.7 per 1000 in England and Wales.[5] The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) provided us with statistics which show that the number of racist and homophobic incidents recorded has more than doubled from 226 and 35 respectively in 2002/03, to 453 and 71 in 2003/04.[6] In absolute terms these numbers may seem modest but Mr Patrick Yu, the Executive Director of the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities (NICEM) pointed out that there was substantial under-reporting of such crimes,[7] and this was confirmed by evidence from the Equality Commission of Northern Ireland[8] and the PSNI.[9] The present police figures may underestimate the problem of racial and homophobic attacks in Northern Ireland by a considerable margin.

5. At the same time, we received evidence that existing legislation, for example, the Public Order (Northern Ireland) Order 1987, was not being used to full effect.[10] This seems to be borne out by the evidence that in 2002/03 there were only 7 prosecutions arising from the 226 racial incidents recorded by the PSNI.[11] We understand that not all incidents recorded may necessarily involve criminal offences. Nevertheless the figures for prosecutions appear worryingly small. There is evidence of a significant and rapidly growing problem of 'hate crime' in Northern Ireland. The Committee supports unreservedly the policy of the Government in seeking to address this worrying trend as a matter of urgency.

Legislative approaches

6. While many of those who have given evidence to us have recognised rightly that an effective solution to the growing threat posed by 'hate crime' must also include non-legislative measures,[12] there has been a broad welcome for the Government's legislative initiative.[13]

7. The legislative approach adopted by the Government in the draft Order is different from the existing law applying to England and Wales. Sections 28 to 32 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 made provision for new racially motivated offences which attract higher maximum penalties than non-racially motivated counterpart offences. The Government decided largely for legal 'technical reasons' not to apply the 1998 Act to Northern Ireland.[14] Evaluation of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 has been carried out by the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University which found that the approach adopted there had been successful in 'sending a message that racist crime will not be tolerated'.[15]

8. The proposals set out in the draft Order adopt a sentence based approach. Unlike the 1998 Act applying in England and Wales, the draft Order creates no new offences but treats hostility based on race, religion or sexual orientation as an aggravating factor which increases the seriousness of the offence:

"The proposals will provide Courts with powers to impose heavier sentences when an offence is aggravated by hostility based on the victim's actual or presumed religion, race or sexual orientation. When there has been such aggravation, the proposals will require sentencers to state this in court and to treat this as an aggravating factor in sentencing."[16]

We heard that the Government had chosen a sentence based approach to its proposed legislation for Northern Ireland in an effort to circumvent difficulties of proving racist motivation which had arisen in England and Wales.[17]

9. Though we cannot prejudge the likely success of the Government's sentence based approach, we hope that it will signal that there is to be no tolerance of 'hate crime' offences. Much will depend in practice on the priority given to enforcing the proposed law by the police. We were heartened by the evidence we received from the Police Service of Northern Ireland which indicated that the police were taking the matter seriously. For example, sectarian incidents will now be recorded by the police.[18] We were also pleased that officials of the Northern Ireland Office in evidence to us indicated that the Government intended to review the effectiveness of the Order in due course.[19]

10. We are convinced that strong laws and effective police enforcement measures against 'hate crime' are required to send the strongest possible signal that such activity is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated. We expect to see the problem tackled more vigorously in the future by the Police Service of Northern Ireland than appears to have been the case in the past.

Exclusion of disability

11. We received powerful evidence from disability groups, for example, from Ms Maureen Piggot, Director of Mencap in Northern Ireland, that people with disabilities are the subject of a wide variety of 'hate crime' attacks including:

"kicking, biting, name-calling, teasing, stealing, pushing, threatening, having things thrown at you, being told to leave a building, hitting, being shouted at, swearing, demanding money, hair-pulling, throwing stones, spitting, poking, being punched, being beaten up, having one's head banged against the wall."[20]

12. Mencap's evidence, collected in a survey in 1999 and which included Northern Ireland based focus groups, indicated that almost a quarter of those surveyed had been physically assaulted.[21] Unfortunately it is clear that many people with a learning disability consider assaults and bullying as an inevitable fact of life.[22] While it appears that neither disabled groups in Northern Ireland,[23] the PSNI, nor the Northern Ireland Office collect statistics on incidents involving disabled people in Northern Ireland, Maureen Piggot was clear that the attacks upon the disabled were numerous, directly comparable with attacks on other groups which were the object of 'hate crime',[24] and applied to people with a wide range of disability, both mental and physical.[25] She also said that consideration should be given to the position of the carers and families of disabled people who were often intimately involved in any attacks,[26] and officials appeared sympathetic to that: 'I would assume that where a carer is an integral part of an individual's life for whatever reason then an assault on a carer would be very similar if not the same as an assault on the individual.'[27]

13. The Government's evidence was that attacks upon disabled people appeared to be 'motivated more by opportunity than hostility' and were not the result of 'hate crime'.[28] We are unimpressed by this line of reasoning. We do not understand how it is possible to take the 'opportunity' to attack a disabled person without feeling 'hostility'. While the Government believes that problems faced by disabled people can be addressed by the 'broadening' of the penalties for violence, fear and harassment which are proposed in the draft Order and are not specific to 'hate crime', this approach is sharply at variance with the position in England and Wales where Section 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 explicitly applies 'hate crime' provisions to offences against the disabled.[29]

14. In the absence of statistical information about 'hate crime' attacks on disabled people, the grounds for including them within the protection of the draft Order may appear less persuasive than for the other groups. However, the evidence we received from disabled groups suggests that there is a potentially serious problem which is being overlooked by the Government in its proposed legislation. The Government has failed to establish any grounds for adopting a different approach in Northern Ireland to attacks against disabled people than applies in England and Wales. We are concerned that the Government, by not including hostility against disabled people within the draft Order, is unintentionally encouraging the perception that disabled people in Northern Ireland are less deserving of specific legal protection than in England and Wales.[30] The Government is rightly prepared to legislate on 'hate crime' offences in Northern Ireland even where the numbers of recorded incidents, while significant, are numerically modest—as in the case of homophobic attacks.[31] We believe that hate motivated incidents involving people with disabilities are likely to be on a scale at least comparable to that demonstrated for homophobic incidents.

15. The Government and the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) should begin to collect statistics for incidents of 'hate crime' against disabled people in Northern Ireland without delay in order that the scale of the problem can be ascertained accurately. We were pleased to hear that the PSNI see no particular difficulties in doing so.[32]

16. However, the collection of statistical information will take time and we do not believe that the Government should wait before taking legislative action. We found the arguments for the Government to amend the draft Order to include 'hate crime' against the disabled compelling. The change is small in drafting terms but could have a crucial effect upon the lives of disabled people in Northern Ireland. The Government should also give consideration to whether the carers and families of disabled people require similar, targeted protection.[33] By taking this action the Government would bring the law in Northern Ireland into line with that in England and Wales and by doing so will provide another signal that in Northern Ireland 'normal rules apply'. The officials who gave evidence to us indicated that the Government's mind was not closed on the matter.[34] For the reasons set out above we urge the Government to ensure that the proposed draft Order is amended to afford appropriate protection from 'hate crime' to people with disabilities.


1   Press Notice 13, 12 February 2004 Back

2   Explanatory Memorandum, Proposal For A Draft Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004, Northern Ireland Office, 9 February 2004, Part 1  Back

3   The proposed draft Order also contains proposals for increasing sentences for offences of violence, fear and harassment, and creates 2 new offences of vehicle taking ('joy riding'). These aspect of the draft Order are outside the scope of this report Back

4   Ibid, Part 1 Back

5   HCR 13. According to Mr Patrick Yu, Executive Director of the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities, the 2001 Census may have underestimated the size of the ethnic minority population in Northern Ireland (Q48). If so, this could reduce the apparent difference between the rate of incidents there and in England and Wales as highlighted in official figures  Back

6   HCR 13A. See also, Q 130  Back

7   Q 39 Back

8   Q 18 Back

9   Q130 Back

10   Other relevant, underused legislation referred to by those who wrote to the Committee: the Protection from Harassment (Northern Ireland) Order 1997 and the Protection of the Person and Property Act (Northern Ireland) 1969 Back

11   HCR 13 Back

12   HCR 5, HCR 6, HCR 11, HCR 15. The Government, too, recognises the need for a joint legislative and non-legislative approach, Q 191 Back

13   HCR 3A, HCR 5, HCR 15 Back

14   'It was decided during the passage of the [Crime and Disorder Act 1998] not to extend these [hate crime] provisions to Northern Ireland. This was largely because of technical difficulties of doing so which made it impossible either to extend directly the provisions in their entirety or to introduce them by negative resolution procedure.' Race Crime and Sectarian Crime Legislation in Northern Ireland: A Consultation Paper, Northern Ireland Office, November 2002, p 7, para 2.5  Back

15   Racist Offences - How is The Law Working?, July 2002, in, Race Crime and Sectarian Crime Legislation In Northern Ireland: A Consultation Paper, Northern Ireland Office, November 2002 Back

16   Explanatory Memorandum, Proposal For A Draft Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004, Northern Ireland Office, 9 February 2004, Part 2 Back

17   Q 176. The Government noted that its consultation on hate crime legislation produced 'wide support for the option that sentencers be given a statutory duty to take aggravation into account when sentencing. It was considered the most effective of the options and the easiest to apply.' Race Crime and Sectarian Crime Legislation in Northern Ireland-A Summary of Responses to Consultation, para 4, further to, Race Crime and Sectarian Crime Legislation in Northern Ireland-A Consultation Paper, Northern Ireland Office, November 2002  Back

18   Q 153. See also, QQ 128,191 Back

19   Q 191 Back

20   HCR 20. See also the evidence of the Royal National Institute of the Blind and the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, HCR 18 Back

21   HCR 20 Back

22   HCR 20 Back

23   Q 103 Back

24   QQ 91, 109 Back

25   Q 102 Back

26   Q 110 Back

27   Q 187 Back

28   HCR 6 Back

29   HCR 6, Q106. Section 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 has not yet been brought into force Back

30   Q 170 Back

31   See para 4 above Back

32   Q 133 Back

33   This would seem to be consistent with the principle on which Article 2(5) of the draft Order is based and which defines "membership" in relation to a racial, religious or sexual orientation group, to include association with members of that group, Explanatory memorandum, Proposal For A Draft Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2004, Northern Ireland Office, 9 February 2004, Part 3 Back

34   QQ 172-174 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 21 May 2004