Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by Women's Aid (HOM 28)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  Women's Aid Federation of England (Women's Aid) is the national domestic violence charity which co-ordinates and supports a network of over 300 local organisations in England, providing over 500 refuges, helplines, outreach services and advice centres. Our work is built on 30 years of campaigning and developing new responses to domestic violence.

  Women's Aid works in partnership nationally and locally with government departments, social services, police, health care professionals and other voluntary organisations to provide an integrated approach to domestic violence. Every year approximately 54,000 women and children stay in refuges in England. Women's Aid also runs the Freephone 24 Hour National Domestic Violence Helpline in partnership with one of our members, Refuge. In 2002, our Helpline answered over 18,000 calls from women seeking advice and support and access to local refuges and domestic violence services. A further 68,000 callers could not get through due to a lack of resources.

  Women's Aid welcomes the opportunity to provide written evidence to the inquiry into homelessness. Our response is based on comprehensive consultation with our national network of domestic violence services. In summary:

    —  It is becoming increasingly difficult to re-house women from refuges into suitable permanent affordable housing, as a direct result of the serious shortage of housing in this country.

    —  Women who are re-housed from refuges are often housed on "sink" estates in poor housing or in the poorest private rented accommodation.

    —  Women are remaining for much longer periods in refuges creating bottlenecks in refuges, which in turn means that women who want to access refuge services cannot because there is no space.

    —  Women who have no dependent children who are fleeing domestic violence have to undergo a test of vulnerability in order to be accepted as homeless and in priority need. This does not apply to women in the same circumstances in Wales.

    —  The "Sanctuary model" of providing additional safety measures to the home is not applicable to women who do not chose to take that option because of fear of further violence. In a growing number of local authorities, it is presented as the only option.

    —  Women with no recourse to public funds are denied housing, leaving these women little option other than to return to their violent partner. Many women's refuge organisations also do not have resources to provide accessible services, for example for minority ethnic women; women without English as a first language; disabled women; women with mental health or substance misuse problems; women with children up to 16 years of age, and women with insecure immigration status. This most vulnerable group of women experiencing domestic violence are often denied access to a place of safety.

    —  There is a significant lack of provision for children made homeless because of domestic violence and insufficient resources for local specialist domestic violence crisis and support services for children and young people, not only in refuges but also in the local community.

    —  Housing authorities and providers have no national minimum standards for identifying and responding to domestic violence, which should mandatory training, protocols for routine questioning, recording, risk assessment and safety planning, safe referral to specialist services, and regular monitoring to ensure particular regard to increasing victim safety and perpetrator accountability.

  Women's Aid welcomes the opportunity to submit further oral evidence. It is important that this Inquiry addresses not only the inadequate homelessness responses to women and children experiencing domestic violence, but also recognises that women may also experiencing other forms of violence against women including rape and sexual assault, sexual harassment, forced marriage, FGM, prostitution and pornography, and trafficking, all of which may contribute to and exacerbate a woman's experience of homelessness. We also therefore recommend that other violence against women services are also called to submit evidence.

1.  THE OVERALL LEVEL AND THE NATURE OF NEED FOR HOUSING HOMELESS PEOPLE

  1.1  Domestic Violence is recognized as a major cause of homelessness: relationship breakdown is one of the top three causes of homelessness[28] and repeat homelessness.

  1.2  Recent government statistics show that 22% (almost 28,000) of homeless households lost their home following relationship breakdown, of these 70% were due to domestic violence.

2.  THE SUCCESS OF POLICIES MEETING THE NEEDS OF HOMELESS HOUSEHOLDS

  2.1  One of the most important needs of women leaving home due to violence is access to safe, secure permanent housing. Women who are unintentionally homeless because of domestic violence are single or have dependent children. In some instances a small number of women will be intentionally homeless. It is our experience that policies to meet their needs have promised much but delivered little. In the case of intentionally homeless women, whilst local authority policies and the legislation states that they may be assisted with housing, in reality they are placed on a waiting list and will remain there forever owing to the pressures on local authorities to re-house homeless persons when they have ever dwindling resources.

  2.2  The Homelessness Act 2002 and the Code of Guidance has brought some positive changes to the safety net provided to victims of domestic violence. The widening of the definition of homelessness to include any applicant who is suffering violence/threats of violence from another person should enable more vulnerable people to gain access to housing. The Act's amendment of the definition of local connection prevents local authorities referring applicants to another local authority area in which they have previously suffered violence and would be liable to experience further violence. However, Women's Aid is concerned that problems with implementing the legislation and guidance still remain. These are outlined below

3.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOMELESSNESS ACT 2002

  3.1  Women's Aid's consultation with the national network of domestic violence services indicates that the biggest problem with the current homelessness legislation is the inconsistency of implementation across the country when dealing with victims of domestic violence, including significant differences within the same local authority area, and also across London Boroughs.

  3.2  Recent research[29] found that local authorities are a key agency encountered by women survivors seeking help. Yet a quarter of the women who had contact with local housing departments (115 women) identified problems including:

    —  Very long waiting times in temporary accommodation (and it being inappropriate and unsafe).

    —  Problem being accepted as "homeless"—not being taken seriously and being asked to "prove" domestic violence.

    —  Women being advised to return home with injunctions even when they felt unsafe to do so.

    —  Not being informed about other services including women's refuges.

  3.3  Women's refuges also report that women who go to the housing department on their own often receive a worse response than those who attend with an advocate or support worker. Some women are so distressed after homeless interviews that they consider returning home, feeling they are to blame for the abuse. Some local authorities only offer women space in local refuges without exploring other options, even if it is unsafe to stay locally, while others do not refer to local refuges but allocate their own unsupported temporary accommodation, without considering the woman's needs for safety and support.

  3.4  The Homelessness Code of Guidance encourages local authorities to demonstrate sensitivity to women fleeing violence, the Code is not mandatory, and local authorities are not bound by the Code when making decisions on homelessness. The decision of vulnerability is at the discretion of the local authority to which victims of domestic violence apply. We believe that all women fleeing domestic violence are vulnerable and should be regarded as such by homelessness legislation.

  Whilst they may be accepted as homeless, it is our experience that significant numbers of single women, with no dependent children, escaping domestic violence experience particular difficulties getting rehoused

  3.5  The Homeless Persons (Priority Need) (Wales) Order 2001 extends the definition of priority need in Wales to include anyone who is fleeing domestic violence or who is at risk of violence if s/he returns home. This provides a better means of protecting victims of domestic violence and would also minimise inconsistencies in local authority practice[30] It would afford equal treatment under the law to women fleeing violence who do not have dependant children with them in the same way as those who do not.

WOMEN'S AID RECOMMENDS THAT THE WELSH ORDER BE ADOPTED IN ENGLAND

  3.6  The time it takes to be rehoused from a refuge also appears to have increased significantly. Some refuges, report that women and children in their refuges have to wait between 12-18 months, sometimes longer, before being rehoused. This is in large part due to local authorities' "target" to reduce the numbers of families in Bed and Breakfast (an example of a government target in one policy area having a detrimental impact on another). The lack of suitable affordable housing in many areas makes it almost impossible for women and children in refuges and temporary accommodation to access move-on accommodation. It is unacceptable that families have to stay in emergency refuge accommodation for this length of time. Waiting longer for rehousing institutionalizes abused women and their children. It also produces a bottleneck in refuges meaning women are not able to leave violent relationships, and women also more likely to return to violent partners.

  3.7  Lack of access to move-on is being exacerbated for refuges that offer self-contained accommodation on assured shorthold tenancies. Local authorities are refusing to accept women in refuges as homeless because they have a tenancy—which a growing number of local authorities argue may be renewed by the refuge provider. It is our view that it is not acceptable for local authorities to use refuges in this way, but experience shows that this is happening now.

  3.8  Another disturbing trend is that the licence agreement which is the usual agreement allowing permission to occupy given to women residents in refuges is also being perceived by local authorities as a means to evade their statutory duty to women who are homeless because of domestic violence.

  A woman who had fled violence from the North West of England to a refuge in a metropolitan city where she had family support networks applied to the city council as a homeless person for re-housing. Her application under the homeless legislation was refused because she was in a refuge under a licence agreement and was deemed to be not homeless. An appeal against this decision to the authority concerned was dismissed as invalid as she has somewhere to live!

  3.9  Women's Aid is also concerned that local housing authorities' dependence upon private sector landlords is increasing particularly in areas where there is a lack of suitable affordable social housing. After a stay in the refuge local authorities may require families to stay a further six months in temporary accommodation before being rehoused. Alternatively women may be housed in a private letting on a six-month tenancy, after which the landlord may reclaim the property to sell it, leading to revolving door homelessness for women and children.

  3.10  In some areas private rented accommodation is the only option available. Research has linked the numbers of homeless acceptances in domestic violence cases by individual local authorities to local housing market conditions. In areas of high demand, women are being asked to obtain legal remedies to resolve their housing problems before they present as homeless, or be referred out of the area regardless of their wish to live there[31] However, renting from a private landlord does not usually offer a good source of long-term, permanent accommodation. In addition, privately rented accommodation can be very expensive, priced outside the range of people on low incomes. In the cheaper tenancies, conditions are usually very poor and the accommodation is often limited to bedsits with little comfort and no security, leaving women fleeing domestic violence particularly vulnerable. But even these cheaper options may cost more than women can afford, especially in the capital. This makes it extremely difficult for many women to make use of private rented accommodation. On average, women have lower incomes than men and therefore find it harder to gain access to housing in the private sector[32]

  3.11  Women's Aid recommends that Local authorities should develop local move-on strategies to reduce the logjam of refuge residents waiting for re-housing. This is essential where local authorities have little or no housing stock of their own, a situation which is likely to become worse with transfer of local authority housing stock to RSLs.

4.  THE BALANCE OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT IN HOUSING FOR KEY WORKERS AND HOMELESS PEOPLE

  4.1  The shortage of affordable housing for owner occupation by "key" workers has been given a great deal of attention in the media. Women's Aid supports efforts to assist key workers to achieve home ownership, but it must not be at the expense of developing housing for those most in housing need. There are currently more than 80,000 homeless households living in temporary accommodation and over one million on council waiting lists, and in excess of half a million households who are officially overcrowded[33] To achieve the government's objective that everyone should have the opportunity of a decent home, the allocation of resources must prioritise those most in need—clearly the homeless.

5.  WHETHER PUBLIC AGENCIES ARE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING PEOPLE BECOMING HOMELESS

  5.1  Women's refuge organizations do not only offer safe housing but also need to provide a range of support services in the refuge and via outreach in the community: practical help, emotional support and counseling, information and advocacy in the areas of housing, legal, health, employment and training, education and welfare services; children's support and advocacy services; outreach including telephone help-lines, support groups, drop-in centres, advice surgeries and resettlement services; and in some areas there are specialist dedicated services for Black and minority ethnic women and children, for disabled women and for lesbians experiencing domestic violence. Many of these services are ineligible for Supporting People funding. It must also be acknowledged that full domestic violence outreach and advocacy services are not comparable to housing-related floating support services. Though floating support is welcome, it is much more limited in scope.

  5.2  Women's Aid recommends the provision of a national programme of comprehensive outreach and advocacy services to help and support women, children and young people to rebuild their lives, which is fundamental to helping women stay safely in their own.

  5.3  The effectiveness of any housing policy is dependent on co-ordinated androbust criminal and civil justice response to domestic violence. Furthermore, the protection and support offered by Women's Aid organizations, in refuges and through outreach services, underpins the effective operation of all local authority, civil and criminal justice interventions and are consistently regarded as most helpful by survivors[34]

  5.4  Women's Aid recommends that funding allocated to local authorities to reduce and prevent homelessness be specifically targeted for domestic violence provision and prevention, accompanied by a requirement to prioritise domestic violence in the development of local Homelessness Strategies.

  5.5  Women's Aid also recommends that all housing departments/Registered Social Landlords receive mandatory training on identifying and responding effectively to domestic violence and are required by legislation to develop and implement domestic violence policies and guidance for intervention that includes routine questioning, recording, risk assessment and safety planning, safe referral to specialist services, and regular monitoring to ensure particular regard to increasing victim safety and perpetrator accountability.

  5.6  All women experiencing domestic violence should have equal access to the provisions within homelessness legislation, including women with insecure immigration status. Many women's refuge organisations also do not have resources to provide accessible services, for example for minority ethnic women; disabled women; women with mental health or substance use problems; women with children up to 16 years of age. This most vulnerable group of women experiencing domestic violence are often denied access to a place of safety.

  5.7  Women's Aid urgently recommends that any woman experiencing domestic violence has equal access to public funds, safety and protection opportunities and subsequently be treated equally under the civil and criminal law. One of the most fundamental provisions in the Human Rights Convention, Article 2, states that everyone has a right to life. It also places on the state a positive duty to protect life so women subject to immigration control who also experience domestic violence must have the same right to services, support and protection from statutory agencies as other abused women.

  5.8  To achieve this we strongly recommend—An exemption to the "no recourse to public funds" rule for women experiencing domestic violence and subject to immigration control, so that they have access to benefits or other government funding, for housing and living expenses. In the interim the government should fund refuges and other domestic violence services on application to meet the accommodation costs and living expenses for women they house who have insecure immigration status and no recourse to public funds.

6.  WHETHER PUBLIC AGENCIES ARE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING PEOPLE BECOMING HOMELESS

  There need to be more support services to prevent people becoming homeless in the first place, such as advocacy, and ongoing support, particularly in relation to domestic violence. These need to be made more widely available and better targeted in order to enable victims of domestic violence to remain in their own homes should they wish to do so. Recent online consultation with survivors[35] also gave abused women a chance to identify their priorities:

    —  More support services—refuges, resettlement, outreach and advocacy—and more resources.

  6.1  Women's Aid supports measures to prevent homelessness by improving the security of the home to enable the victim to remain safely in the accommodation, based on the model of the Sanctuary project in Harrow. However this should only be considered if:

    —  there is no risk of further violence; and

    —  this is what the woman herself wants.

  6.2  We are extremely concerned that local authorities, as part of their prevention of homelessness strategies, are insisting that additional security measures are the only option, and refusal to participate in the scheme would lead to women being refused access to housing via the homelessness route, or offered housing miles away from their social networks and children's schools.

  A woman who applied as homeless from a refuge was told that she could either have the additional security measures placed at her former home or be re-housed 30 miles away, which would have left her bereft of family support networks isolated from friends and children would have to be uprooted from their schools.

  6.3  Guidance is also needed for local authority housing departments to require them to fund additional security measures to a property, irrespective of whether it is social housing or privately owned, instead of housing women and children in temporary accommodation.

  6.4  The homelessness Code of Guidance (6.21) states, "When dealing with domestic violence within the home housing authorities should consider the scope for evicting the perpetrator and allowing the victim to remain in the home". We support the principle that perpetrators' behaviour should be subject to sanctions and also constitute a breach of tenancy agreement. However proceedings undertaken by the landlord must not further endanger women and children. Such action would seriously exacerbate an already volatile situation and would lead to the violent partner being found to be intentionally homeless and give further impetus to the continuation of post-separation violence.

7.  PRIORITY FOR THE HOMELESS WITHIN THE OVERALL ALLOCATION OF SOCIAL HOUSING

  7.1  The adequacy of investment in housing for homeless people and the quality of accommodation available for them is a matter of serious concern. It requires a massive increase in investment in building new homes for people who need them alongside the investment to improve homes in disrepair. Local authorities need the resources to repair their housing stock alongside development of new homes with RSLs.

  7.2  The shortage in the supply of good quality social housing means that many women and children fleeing domestic violence will spend a period of time in temporary accommodation provided by the local authority. Refuges are the most suitable form of temporary accommodation for women and children fleeing domestic violence because of the specialist support they provide. Refuges only account for approximately 15% of temporary placements and there are considerable gaps in service provision throughout England[36] Lack of alternatives, particularly in high demand areas, means that women and children fleeing violence are placed in other less suitable forms of accommodation.

  7.3  Women's Aid want victims of domestic violence and their children to receive good quality support regardless of the type of temporary accommodation they are placed in. The current situation does not require local authorities to place people in temporary accommodation that gives them access to specialist domestic violence support, which often results in women leaving and possibly returning to a violent situation before they are made an offer of permanent accommodation. ODPM statistics show that in 2001-02 a quarter of all temporary placements ended in this way, a significant proportion of these will include women and children fleeing violence and may result in them becoming homeless again.

  7.4  Women's Aid recommends that the government should set minimum standards for the physical standard for temporary accommodation and the support provided to homeless persons, as is the case for refuges. We are also concerned about the sub-standard quality of housing being allocated to some women on leaving refuges. Good practice has been developed in some areas where a domestic violence panel has been established to fast track housing applications, accompanied by resources to provide resettlement and longer-term Women's Aid outreach support for women and children in the community.

  7.5  Many women fleeing violence are rehoused successfully in either council or housing association properties, and are enabled to start new lives. The Homelessness Act 2002 has improved this for some, but for others, the decrease in the availability of socially rented housing, the consequent hoops through which some councils expect abused women to jump, and the cumulative effects of government housing policies over the last 25 years in terms of access to permanent rehousing can make the search for permanent housing a nightmare.

Linda Delahay

Housing Policy and Services Officer





28   Homelessness Directorate Briefing December 2003. Back

29   Humphreys and Thiara, Routes to Safety, Women's Aid Federation of England, 2002. Back

30   Welsh Statutory Instrument 2001, No. 607 (W.30). The Homeless Persons (Priority Need) (Wales) Order 2001 No.5. Back

31   Davis C (2003) Housing Associations-Rehousing Women Leaving Domestic Violence, Bristol: The Policy Press. Back

32   The London Housing Unit5 found that only 19% of women could afford to rent a bedsit in London without assistance from housing benefit, as compared with 57% of men. It demonstrated that privately rented housing, in London at least, was only slightly more affordable than owner occupation. This has remained the case to date with rents in many cities, especially London, prohibitively high. Back

33   Shelter. Back

34   Women's National Commission, Unlocking The Secret, 2003. Back

35   Hansard Society, Womenspeak, 2002. Back

36   DTLR WAFE, LRC research 1998. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 October 2004